Cardinal George on border kids: ‘We need to protect these abandoned children’

  • Thread starter Thread starter anthony022071
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I also care, and for your information catholic charities is leading the charge to help these kids.

And I’m my opinion you sounded confrontational, I’m glad the church goes against your beliefs…
Catholic Charities will be well reimbursed for their efforts.

The US Anti-Deficiency Act prohibits any government employee (including the Secretary of Health and Human Services) from accepting voluntary services. There are actually criminal penalties against doing so.
 
You know, 100 years ago the same debate was happening about immigrants, except then the U.S. had open boarders and just about anyone could come here to make a new life. Of course, instead of complaining about kids from Central American, Americans were complaining about all the dirty Catholics coming in.
 
You know, 100 years ago the same debate was happening about immigrants, except then the U.S. had open boarders and just about anyone could come here to make a new life. Of course, instead of complaining about kids from Central American, Americans were complaining about all the dirty Catholics coming in.
Amen.
 
You know, 100 years ago the same debate was happening about immigrants, except then the U.S. had open boarders and just about anyone could come here to make a new life. Of course, instead of complaining about kids from Central American, Americans were complaining about all the dirty Catholics coming in.
There’s still a virulent anti-Catholic group out there. It’s called the Democratic Party.
 
You know, 100 years ago the same debate was happening about immigrants, except then the U.S. had open boarders and just about anyone could come here to make a new life. Of course, instead of complaining about kids from Central American, Americans were complaining about all the dirty Catholics coming in.
If the USA didn’t accept (legally) millions of people each year, you might have a point.

But we have granted permanent resident status to over 24,000,000 people from 1990 - 2013. (23 years). In twice that period, from 1880 - 1929, the peak of the immigration period, when we just let people stream through, the number that came in was only 27,000,000 people

So, based on the facts, it seems your argument is utterly invalid.
 
If the USA didn’t accept (legally) millions of people each year, you might have a point.

But we have granted permanent resident status to over 24,000,000 people from 1990 - 2013. (23 years). In twice that period, from 1880 - 1929, the peak of the immigration period, when we just let people stream through, the number that came in was only 27,000,000 people

So, based on the facts, it seems your argument is utterly invalid.
Amen.
 
Matthew 25: 41-46 is crystal clear.
You cite this, but, again, the question comes down to this: “what are you, personally, doing about this situation?”

Matt 25:32 says: “Before him will be gathered all the nations, and he will separate them one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats,”

The word used for “nations” is the Greek word, ἔθνος, “peoples” – it is not talking about a political structure, the State.

So He is separating the peoples in the world into the sheep and the goats.

The Navarre Bible commentary made the following observation (which I think is a good one):

This parable clearly shows that Christianity cannot be reduced to a kind of agency for “doing good”. Service of our neighbor acquires supernatural value when it is done out of love for Christ, when we see Christ in the person in need…Any interpretation of Jesus’ teaching on the Last Judgment would be wide of the mark if it gave a materialistic meaning or confused mere philanthropy with genuine Christian charity.

Among the citations Navarre provided as references were the following:

St John of the Cross said,

Our Lord will ask us to account not only for the evil we have done but also for the good we have omitted. We can see that sins of omission are a very serious matter and that the basis of love of neighbour is Christ’s presence in the least of our brothers and sisters.

The Second Vatican Council stated:
  1. Coming down to practical and particularly urgent consequences, this council lays stress on reverence for man; everyone must consider his every neighbor without exception as another self, taking into account first of all His life and the means necessary to living it with dignity,(8) so as not to imitate the rich man who had no concern for the poor man Lazarus.(9)
In our times a special obligation binds us to make ourselves the neighbor of every person without exception and of actively helping him when he comes across our path, whether he be an old person abandoned by all, a foreign laborer unjustly looked down upon, a refugee, a child born of an unlawful union and wrongly suffering for a sin he did not commit, or a hungry person who disturbs our conscience by recalling the voice of the Lord, “As long as you did it for one of these the least of my brethren, you did it for me” (Matt. 25:40).

Or as Pope Francis stated at the beginning of his Pontificate:

Let us never forget that authentic power is service, and that the Pope too, when exercising power, must enter ever more fully into that service which has its radiant culmination on the Cross. He must be inspired by the lowly, concrete and faithful service which marked Saint Joseph and, like him, he must open his arms to protect all of God’s people and embrace with tender affection the whole of humanity, especially the poorest, the weakest, the least important, those whom Matthew lists in the final judgment on love: the hungry, the thirsty, the stranger, the naked, the sick and those in prison (cf. Mt 25,31-46). Only those who serve with love are able to protect!

When you stand before The Lord on that fearful day, do you think He will be satisfied when you say, “I made sure the rich paid their fair share” or “I voted for Democratic politicians who implemented strong social justice programs to make sure the poor were cared for” will suit Him well?

Hardly.

It comes down to this:
  • What did YOU do to make that stranger welcome?
  • What did YOU do to give the hungry food?
  • What did YOU do to] give the thirsty drink?
  • What did YOU do to visit the sick?
  • What did YOU do to come to the prisoner?
So once YOU have gone and taken some of them into your home, once YOU have used YOUR personal time, talent, and treasure to feed and clothe them, once YOU have visited the sick among them and bathed those infected with tuberculosis, scabies, and other infectious diseases, and once YOU have visited those of them who are incarcerated because they are members of MS-13 or 18th Street, then come back and talk to me.

(And, oh, by the way, if you do take some kids in, be sure to not accept the $6,000 a month being offered to do so…because it ain’t charity if you’re getting paid. Just like it ain’t charity if your “charities” gets paid $997,456,398 to provide services over the past couple of years. Or if your “relief services” gets paid $1,609,113,260 to do its thing over the past couple of years.)

Because otherwise, you’re just trying to be generous with somebody else’s money.
 
We are legally obligated to protect those children until we can reunite them with their families either here or in their homeland. Beyond that it is just the merciful thing to do to protect these kids from harm. I am not in favor of illegal immigration but that is not the point. Our border desperately needs to be secured but until that happens the kids will pour in and they need help from responsible adults.
 
Thank you for your question. I feel about Black People exactly the same as I feel about all of us. The amount of money we have in North America should be ample to help the people in the inner cities as well as welcoming refugees. We, like many other nations, suffer from corruption at the top end. Which is why I don’t like to spend my money at Walmart, et. al. and prefer to support local businesses. (I realize that it seems off topic, but for me it isn’t.)
I must have missed the memo that says I (part of “we”) have ample money. I need to keep all I earn - and then some!
 
Catholic Charities will be well reimbursed for their efforts.

The US Anti-Deficiency Act prohibits any government employee (including the Secretary of Health and Human Services) from accepting voluntary services. There are actually criminal penalties against doing so.
So you think Catholic Charities is doing this to get money back? In your opinion it sounds like your saying, that they are doing it out iof greed and not to help? I think you are so wrong b/c Catholic Charities tends to have a very good reputation, and I know these guys are not doing it for the show and attention, but they are doing it b/c it is the right thing to do.
 
Thank you for the reminder. Since I’m one of the people on this forum who truly “care”, I need to research what level of service that I could provide that would be of optimal help. I’m not sure yet what that looks like, but I will look into what I can do.
I should do the same.
 
=chero23;12184678]I also care, and for your information
:rotfl:

I’d stay away from FYI posts on the news forums
catholic charities is leading the charge to help these kids.
I know.

It’s funny, I thought the Democrats and big government were supposed to the be first to jump in.
And I’m my opinion you sounded confrontational, I’m glad the church goes against your beliefs…
Avoid using “you” on the news forums, please. :thankyou:

I wouldn’t say the Church goes against my beliefs.

:tiphat:
 
Catholic Charities will be well reimbursed for their efforts.

The US Anti-Deficiency Act prohibits any government employee (including the Secretary of Health and Human Services) from accepting voluntary services. There are actually criminal penalties against doing so.
What a ridiculous law.

This is why big government = fail.

:yup:
 
No, not like the Nazi invasion of Poland. Is that the only kind of invasion there is?

Per Bing:

Yes, that sounds like this could be an invasion.

Ex. World Cup, American fans invade Brazil. Yes, that was an invasion even if it was a friendly one.
British Invasion 😃
 
I must have missed the memo that says I (part of “we”) have ample money. I need to keep all I earn - and then some!
Same here, I totally get it. That’s why I said what I did in my first post. We are all paying a very high cost for low, low prices. I realize some will see that as completely unrelated and I see it as the fruits that we have borne.
 
:rotfl:

I’d stay away from FYI posts on the news forums

I know.

It’s funny, I thought the Democrats and big government were supposed to the be first to jump in.

Avoid using “you” on the news forums, please. :thankyou:

I wouldn’t say the Church goes against my beliefs.

:tiphat:
I don’t see any of my posts being funny. And yes, the church is helping these kids out, as they are asking us to help. That goes against what you are posting so your going against church teaching. You’ll laugh now but it’s like I’ve mentioned, when you find yourself in these people shoes, it’ll hurt you for having had those thoughts.
 
MODERATOR NOTICE

Please charitably discuss the issues, not each other

Please stay with the topic of the original post:

Cardinal George on border kids: ‘We need to protect these abandoned children’
 
One of the struggles I am having with this is that there are many children in the world who need protection, not just the ones who have been taken to U.S. borders by parents who are banking on the good will of Americans. It seems a shame that all of the oppressed children in Africa can’t be brought here, too. And all the suffering children in all nations of the world.

How do we reconcile helping so few and ignoring so many? I realize that that U.S. is doing what we can to help the children of the world, but we are not taking them into our country like we are these children from South of the U.S.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top