L
LisaA
Guest
You should address the comments without the need to set up straw men. One poster indicated that the role of the Acolyte has greatly diminished and thus this might be a major reason for the reduction in boys’ interest in serving. I agree. You can see this in many activities…for example on the slopes boys are more likely to go for the snowboard where they can bombadier down the hill whereas girls tend to the skis. Doesn’t mean that there aren’t male skiiers or female snowboarders but the difference inspires more male interest. Ditto in the world of horses. Boys want to go fast and high. They are more likely to be interested in riding jumpers or roping than dressage patterns.So is the difference “boys vs. boys + girls” or “traditional vs. ordinary”?
I don’t see how what you describe is “muscular”… Also, precision, efficiency, and reverence are not male-only traits.
Your words can be perceived as being condescending, praising those who you deem to be more ascetic in practice while diminishing others with their “only role” during Communion. They may not be priests, but they are still serving God.
Further you make my point. In diminishing the role of the Altar Server to a bit part instead of an integral part of the Mass, it has become less challenging. Boys are attracted to challenges. Watching the young men at the traditional parish as they moved with utter precision was inspiring. Like watching Marines or the Thunderbirds. In contrast our Altar Servers spend most of their time sitting quietly. Tell me you think boys are better at or more willing than girls to sit quietly and I will introduce you to thousands of moms and teachers who beg to differ.
I don’t know why you think acknowledging that males and females are different and that different activities appeal to boys than girls is some kind of hate speech. Our Church has done a masterful job in such works as Muleris Dignitatum and Theology of the Body in helping us appreciate and honor our masculine or feminine nature.