M
mary_bobo
Guest
Chris G:
On the bureaucracy, the farther down the food chain you can get the help for those in need, the better. Every layer of government just means more red-tape, deciding who does what, etc.
As for the cafeteria Catholics, if “we” keep electing them, why should they change? After all, it’s all about winning and a politician, either party, would kill to win.
You sure hit the nail on the head. Remember the old saying about feeding a man vs. teaching him how to catch his own food? The welfare system has taken all of the incentive out of working and one does not value what one is given as opposed to what one earns for him/her self. Tax cuts do, indeed, help the poor. Business owners can afford to build their business, hire more people who then put more tax money into the coffers. Everytime it has been tried, (Kennedy, Reagan, GWBush) it has worked. I don’t understand why more people can’t see that for themselves.Unfortunately I think it is because many Catholics do not take their faith seriously. How many times have you heard supposed Catholics say: “I’m Catholic but I don’t agree with the Church on *”
And the list goes on.
- Abortion
- Birth Control
- The Eucharist
- The Trinity
- The authority of the Pope
- Priest celebacy
- Male only Priests
The only orthodox Catholics that vote for the Democrat are the ones that don’t understand that tax cuts DO help the poor and welfare doesn’t. And that the poor are better helped on the local level, not by some huge wasteful inefficient bureaucracy.
The rest I would suppose are Catholic in name only. Which seems to be the majority.
On the bureaucracy, the farther down the food chain you can get the help for those in need, the better. Every layer of government just means more red-tape, deciding who does what, etc.
As for the cafeteria Catholics, if “we” keep electing them, why should they change? After all, it’s all about winning and a politician, either party, would kill to win.