D
Dauphin
Guest
Who would say otherwise? This doesn’t make unity of belief irrelevant.Singingbeauty you are a part of the Church that Christ established no matter how insecure, arrogant Christians may say otherwise.
Who would say otherwise? This doesn’t make unity of belief irrelevant.Singingbeauty you are a part of the Church that Christ established no matter how insecure, arrogant Christians may say otherwise.
The Bible is the inerrant word of God. It is the heart of the Catholic faith. It is a pillar of the Church. I believe everything it contains.
Now what relevance did those excerpts have?
During the Western Schism, the Roman line of Popes was the only valid one. It’s impossible to have more than one Pope at a time.The best was when there were two and three “Successors to Saint Peter” each claiming to be the “real” Pope hurling Anathemas at each other, and the time there was a female Pope posing as a male! Yep, that “infallable, error-free, preserved” CHURCH.
This is a lie. Nowhere has it been contended that being a formal member of the Roman Catholic Church is a neccesity of means for salvation. However, being part of the Body of Christ and assenting, to the best of your ability, to Catholic doctrine *is *necessary.Whiz, I already told you people on this forum and this very thread have said there is no salvation outside of your Club-Rome. What “verification” are you talking about. Simply READ what your comrades have posted!
You came and dumped a load of horse manure on this thread, throwing out so many ludicrous allegations that no one has the time to wade through your posts trying to refute them.Anyway, since I am being asked to start another thread, maybe I will, but not because of some threat about being reported to the Moderators! Comments were made here that I responded to, and the rest took a life of is own.
Not clear at all. You seem to have little understanding of the Catholic faith or of the historical events involving the Catholic Church. If it’s taken 24 years for you to arrive at this state of ignorance and bigotry, perhaps religious scholarship just isn’t for you!Also, I know FULL WELL what Catholicism teaches, being raised a strict Catholic, and I was being indoctrinated by priests on the side. Since my conversion to Christ and entering into the truth, I have studied Catholicism in detail, have spoken with hundreds of Catholics, debated some of their priests, and watched and read others debate them. I know what they believe and why, and I know what I believe and why. I am not new to these things, seeing after my conversion serious study followed and has continued for TWENTY FOUR YEARS. Are we clear on that? Thanks.
Yep - you are so right.Nothing good will come of this thread. And the above post just ensured that. So sad.
Did you know, as a Christian, that if you lived previous to 1521ad. you would know nothing other than catholic teaching, because you would be have been Catholic. Even if you were part of the schism, and left the church, you would have still followed 98+% of what the Catholic Church teaches.Hello Everyone,
In light of several apalling threads out there regarding protestants and our Faith I just had this need to put this out there…
Why does it seem that SOME catholics assume that protestants are idiots who gave no thought as to what we believe?
Did you know…
That most protestants, including myself, have done research - prayed heavily - talked to others - and done more research before deciding which belief system to follow??? We didn’t just happen on it and decide that this was it without another thought. Contrary to SOME catholics beliefs we are not stupid. We put a LOT of thought into what we believe and it is so hurtful and ignorant to assume that we are just morons who can’t think for ourselves.
Did you know…
Most protestants don’t know much about the catholic Faith and even tho they have objections regarding said Faith they certainly DON’T protest it. I would fall into this group. Growing up I had never really learned anything (good or bad) about Catholocism and hadn’t given it much thought. When I hear that I am a protestant because I protest the church it confuses me, since how could I protest something I know little about and never gave much thought to??? I may disagree with some teachings but I in no way protest it…
Did you know…
That we love Christ just as much as you?
Did you know…
That God loves us just as much as you?
We are told:
John 13:34
"A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another.
John 13:33-35 (in Context) John 13 (Whole Chapter)
John 13:35
By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another."
John 13:34-36 (in Context) John 13 (Whole Chapter)
Romans 12:10
Be devoted to one another in brotherly love. Honor one another above yourselves.
Romans 12:9-11 (in Context) Romans 12 (Whole Chapter)
Romans 13:8
Love, for the Day is Near ] Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for he who loves his fellowman has fulfilled the law.
Romans 13:7-9 (in Context) Romans 13 (Whole Chapter)
We need to remember to LOVE one another. We will not judge eachother (Thank the Lord!) God will do the judging so leave that to Him.
And for those who think we, as protestants, are without Faith or hate Christ (it is so sad that some believe this) talk to God before you spread this anti-protestant gibberish any further…
So in short - protestants are not idiots, so stop treating us like we are…![]()
What are you talking about??? The Popes promised them indulgenses, and a SHORT STAY in Purgatory! Dare you contradict what previous Popes uttered? They commended the Crusaders, and promised them an EASY OUT if they got a little carried away. So who is telling the truth, you or the Popes of the Crusade times??? Having a little trouble with facts, are we Dauphin? Your historical improvisation may work on other “unlettered” Catholics, but it will never work on someone who actually READS history, and has books on the Crusades. And thank God I live in America, where Rome has not been able to suppress learning and the Bible like she has IN EVERY SINGLE NATION WHERE SHE HAD POLITICAL POWER.Sure. If they were involved in killing innocent people, they were indeed guilty of murder and are indeed condemned if they didn’t repent. Have I claimed that all Catholics are incapable of sin? You’re the only one who’s claimed to be incapable of sin.
No you won’t convert, no matter how much evidence is presented.SuperSola…If you can prove that Scripture proves the doctrine of sola scritptura, I will convert to whatever Protestant denomination you choose for me. Please provide the chapter and verse that says Scripture is the sole rule of faith.
Believing that Christ wasn’t human is about as far from “Christ-like” as you can get.The Albigensians were FAR MORE CHRISTLIKE than the heretics who felt they had a right to murder them.
Spare us, please. The Bible was written, assembled, and canonized by Catholics.The most anti-Catholic book ever written was the Bible, of which a study reveals to us what Rome really is–a religio-politco Institution bent on global domination. Yes, we KNOW what spirit she is of, desiring to lord it over others.
You don’t seem to know what an indulgence is or what it effects. I expected as much.What are you talking about??? The Popes promised them indulgenses, and a SHORT STAY in Purgatory!
I didn’t. I made a general statement about murder.Dare you contradict what previous Popes uttered?
Yes, they did. As I said. I believe the crusades to the east to be eminently justified.They commended the Crusaders,
I’m not sure what you mean by this.and promised them an EASY OUT if they got a little carried away.
Your hysterics are getting a bit tiresome. I said that murder was wrong. No Pope has contradicted that.So who is telling the truth, you or the Popes of the Crusade times???
You say you converted 24 years ago? You seem to have the rhetorical skills of someone who can’t be much older than 12.Having a little trouble with facts, are we Dauphin?
Suppress learning? Tell me, which institution founded the universities of Europe?Your historical improvisation may work on other “unlettered” Catholics, but it will never work on someone who actually READS history, and has books on the Crusades. And thank God I live in America, where Rome has not been able to suppress learning and the Bible like she has IN EVERY SINGLE NATION WHERE SHE HAD POLITICAL POWER.
He says that because he knows there is no such evidence. Sola scriptura is a doctrine completely alien to the Church of Christ.No you won’t convert, no matter how much evidence is presented. Who are you trying to kid?
How do you know? I’ll take your answer as your failure to meet the challenge.No you won’t convert, no matter how much evidence is presented.
Who are you trying to kid?
Again, I see no evidence that you’ve turned away from any kind of sin or accepted Christ in any sense. All I see are the words of a half-mad protestant who doesn’t understand the subject matter he pretends to be so expert at, and equates the behavior of Catholics with the truth of the Catholic faith.Dauphin’s posts are a beautiful example of simply making it up as you go along. One lie upon another. The sad thing is Dauphin is calling unclean what God has made clean, and attributing to the Devil the work of the Holy Spirit in my life. Dauphin is dangerously close to the blapshemy that will not be forgiven, but this individual continues on in reckless Crusader fashion.
Ok…since you keep bringing this up over and over again, please cite your source for this (historical & upbiased, please).Gotta love that Vatican historical revisionism. Before 1521 were MANY Christian groups preaching the true faith, and against Rome, and Rome was killing them and trying to stamp out their existence lest someone find out there was more than one group claiming Apostolic succession! Rome was killing the Waldensians for hundreds of years prior to the reformation, and other groups, like the Bohemians, Paulicians, Albigneses, etc.
Uncalled for.Dauphin’s posts are a beautiful example of simply making it up as you go along. One lie upon another. The sad thing is Dauphin is calling unclean what God has made clean, and attributing to the Devil the work of the Holy Spirit in my life. Dauphin is dangerously close to the blapshemy that will not be forgiven, but this individual continues on in reckless Crusader fashion.
Also uncalled for.Thank God that WHOSOEVER CALLS UPON THE NAME OF THE LORD SHALL BE SAVED, no matter what some bigoted Papist says!
Again, cite your source for this - unbiased and historical, please.Oh and the “legend” of Pope Joan is every bit as “legendary” as the infallability of the Pope, Mariolotry, Apostolic Succession through Rome, indulgenses, and any history book written by a Catholic. All your histories and “proofs” have as much evidence as Pope Joan.
Then, please present us with the evidence…we’re all ears!The Albigensians were FAR MORE CHRISTLIKE than the heretics who felt they had a right to murder them. The Albigensians HURT NO ONE, but Rome has hurt many. You say I said saying they were more Christian than the “Christian church” is wrong. Excuse me fallacy meister, but you are ASSUMING what needs to be proven–that Rome IS “the Church”. You couldn’t prove that if your soul depended on it, and it does. What I have been posting–Biblical and historical FACTS papists HATE prove Rome cannot be what she claims. Rome’s history is EVIL, oppression, suppression, illiteracy and hate. Such a monster is not THE “church” but the bloody imposter we were warned about in Revelation 17, sporting herself as a Queen. You can’t deal with EVIDENCE, that is all.
Though this appears to be a matter of opinion only, I would like to see where it is in the historical context where the Bible was used as a tool by the Church for total world domination.The most anti-Catholic book ever written was the Bible, of which a study reveals to us what Rome really is–a religio-politco Institution bent on global domination. Yes, we KNOW what spirit she is of, desiring to lord it over others.
You treat Dauphin and other Catholics on this site as if we’ve never picked up a history book! Get over it! You seem to have so much to say - please start backing up your overblown rhetoric with some solid, unbiased facts. If you want to show us the error of our ways, you’re going to have to give us more convincing arguments than your unsolicited, fanatical, and completely off-topic rantings.What are you talking about??? The Popes promised them indulgenses, and a SHORT STAY in Purgatory! Dare you contradict what previous Popes uttered? They commended the Crusaders, and promised them an EASY OUT if they got a little carried away. So who is telling the truth, you or the Popes of the Crusade times??? Having a little trouble with facts, are we Dauphin? Your historical improvisation may work on other “unlettered” Catholics, but it will never work on someone who actually READS history, and has books on the Crusades. And thank God I live in America, where Rome has not been able to suppress learning and the Bible like she has IN EVERY SINGLE NATION WHERE SHE HAD POLITICAL POWER.
Sola scriptura is not in the Bible.So where does the Bible say Sola Scriptura is wrong???
God doesn’t condemn trusting His Word - His *entire *Word. Written *and *spoken Word.Where does God condemn only trusting His Word?
What have I said that needed substantiation?Dauphin, your baseless ad hominems and historical inventions don’t hold water. You cannot substantiate ANYTHING you have said, and you even spin what you posted earlier.
You read something into my words that just wasn’t there. I corrected you.Liars always have to lie about their lies as well.
Cut her some slack. There were snipers in the nearby hills. She exaggerated, but these political controversies are completely without substance. You guys really need to elevate your political discourse. I wish you had chosen Mike Huckabee as the republican nominee!Look at Hillary, lying about her lies when she was in Bosnia.
HAHAHA! That’s rich. You ask us to prove that sola scriptura is wrong by using sola scriptura. A funnier request I could not imagine.So where does the Bible say Sola Scriptura is wrong??? This will be good. Where does God condemn only trusting His Word?
Geeez. Are you for real? Posts like yours only confirm how far the protestants have strayed from the Truth.It is a LOT MORE “charitable” than the way Rome has “proselytized” Prostestants! Crusades and Inquisitions, torture, executions, etc. Yes you sure do have much to “go through”.
Being emotional/passionate is one thing. being obnoxiously bombastic is quite another. You hurl out Scriptural verses without any explanation as to how they are relevant. You quote legendary and questionable sources (i.e. Pope Joan and the like) and you challenge historical evidence. You claim that, prior to 1521, there were numerous ‘Protestant’ groups out there and that it is only revisionist history that denies this. Sorry, there are too many Non-Roman Catholic historians out, as well as the fact that the Roman Catholic Church was scrupulous about recording information about heretical/heterodox, for this claim to stand.Thanks for the admonitions nsper7, misplaced as they are. My conversion experience, where Christ delivered me, happened 24 YEARS AGO, not weeks ago, and so, you PRESUME to believe to know things about me you certainly do not. Studying the Bible, history, church history, doctrine, doctrinal controversies, other religions, apologetics, etc has been what I have been doing, and I’d put my library up against anyone’s on this forum. I have obeyed where it says study to show yourself approved unto God. You assume WRONGLY, because in your limited experience and understanding, you think someone well studied is unemotional, dead calm, and always diplomatic like a politician who follows Political Correctness. I am not under the influence of that Western error as you appear to be, mistaking THAT for proper Christian behavior. These issues are of ETERNAL consequence and I speak as someone who believes it.
You should read better commentary, especially on the Matthew 23:8 passage you quoted. I direct you to J. P. Holding’s Do We Call Men “Master” or Not? and this website’s Call No Man “Father”?. This shows an example of ignoring Scriptural context and linguistics. If you are going to make arguments, please do some more research. You claim to be extremely knowledgable and to have a long experience as a Bible-believing Christian…well, it really isn’t showing through here.Perhaps you should study the Bible a little more and you’ll find that the denomination you are considering has MANY unBiblical things about it, including having offices of a “priest” and calling that man “father”, a religious title EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN BY OUR LORD-Matt 23:8 There is NO SUCH THING as a Christian “priest” where he walks around in long robes, sports a blasphemous title and pretends to perform sacred rituals that we need to be saved. The Biblical offices are didactic and not sacerdotal. If yo want a NT type curch, go find you a solid Pentecostal Charismatic one, free from religiousity, that loves the Scripture, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, and you’ll know FREEDOM and realize that all the religious trappings of that denomination you are considering is actually an indictment, seeing all those things betray a LACK of the Spirit of God, the anointing and freedom His Presence brings.
Sure you do. As I mentioned earlier, Scripture is a high-context document written in a different language to a difficult culture and time period.Also, I don’t need to “explain” the passages I pasted, seeing they are at a 4th-grade English comprehension level. Either YOU BELIEVE what is said, or you DO NOT.
Obnoxiously attaking everyone else, throwing Scripture verses everywhere and continuously going on about how wonderful your brand of Christianity is doesn’t prove anything either.Salvation is in a PERSON, not your club. You have NO PROOF from Scripture there is no salvation outside of Club-Rome. Asserting it over and over is not proof. I have ETERNAL LIFE because I cried out to Him and he answered and delivered me. You have a denominational affiliation. I have a relationship with the Father, and worship Him in spirit and in truth, you worship him in the flesh, idolatry, and error.
Now you’re claiming to know Roman Catholicism better than Roman Catholics do. You need to clam down and do some more reading. Cousin Billy-Bob’s “Why I hate those dirty Catholics” doesn’t cut it.Whiz, I already told you people on this forum and this very thread have said there is no salvation outside of your Club-Rome. What “verification” are you talking about. Simply READ what your comrades have posted!
You claim a hefty load of knowledge and I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt, but so far, very little of that supposed knowledge is trickling down into this argument. So far, all I see are insults and ignorance of history and true Roman Catholic doctrine. Again, calm down and treat this more like a scholarly/academic/theological discussion not the pulpit at your home church.Also, I know FULL WELL what Catholicism teaches, being raised a strict Catholic, and I was being indoctrinated by priests on the side. Since my conversion to Christ and entering into the truth, I have studied Catholicism in detail, have spoken with hundreds of Catholics, debated some of their priests, and watched and read others debate them. I know what they believe and why, and I know what I believe and why. I am not new to these things, seeing after my conversion serious study followed and has continued for TWENTY FOUR YEARS. Are we clear on that? Thanks.
I’m glad to see he’s an expert on prophecy and the spiritual nature of all Catholic too. Is there anything this guy doesn’t know? After all, he is an expert on Scripture, ‘true’ Roman Catholic doctrine, ‘true’ history and now he knows prophecy too! I hope my sarcasm is detectableCatholics need to go hang their heads and be quiet, knowing their own history and shame, and stop preaching, seeing Rome has disqualified herself from telling anyone anything. Rome has no moral authority to “pontificate” on anything, seeing her history is replete with scandal after scandal, scheme after scheme, murder upon murder, vast sin amongst its members everywhere, gross sin amongst its leaders, child molestation, cover-ups, etc. The Vatican is amazing–her history is nothing but sin, sin and more sin, and then she sits there and pontificates and says she is IT. Tis so OBVIOUS Rome cannot be what she claims, just by looking at the lives of her parishoners, the nations where Catholicism was IT, and Rome’s leaders–all corrupt, Biblically illiterate, lustful for sex, making liquor, power, murder, vengeance, etc. Romanism is a religion of HATE. There is NO WAY that Cult is Christ’s church. She is found in Revelation 17.
You really need to study some more on these heretical/heterodox groups.Gotta love that Vatican historical revisionism. Before 1521 were MANY Christian groups preaching the true faith, and against Rome, and Rome was killing them and trying to stamp out their existence lest someone find out there was more than one group claiming Apostolic succession! Rome was killing the Waldensians for hundreds of years prior to the reformation, and other groups, like the Bohemians, Paulicians, Albigneses, etc. But the gates of Hell did not prevail against the true Church, and Rome has NEVER been able to stamp out Biblical Christianity, though she has tried BY THE SWORD for a long time, and here in America, through blatant lying.
Got to love that. If you can’t outsmart them, threaten them with Hell for disagreeing with you. You’re doing exactly what you accuse the Roman Catholic Church of doing.Dauphin’s posts are a beautiful example of simply making it up as you go along. One lie upon another. The sad thing is Dauphin is calling unclean what God has made clean, and attributing to the Devil the work of the Holy Spirit in my life. Dauphin is dangerously close to the blapshemy that will not be forgiven, but this individual continues on in reckless Crusader fashion.
Issues such as Papal Infallibility, Mariology, Apostolic Succession, indulgences and the like are matters of theology, not history (although we can point to historical documents that discuss such theological issues). Whether there was a Pope Joan or not is a matter of history, not theology.Oh and the “legend” of Pope Joan is every bit as “legendary” as the infallability of the Pope, Mariolotry, Apostolic Succession through Rome, indulgenses, and any history book written by a Catholic. All your histories and “proofs” have as much evidence as Pope Joan.
You need to study about the Albigensians some more. They were a gnostic heresy/heterodox group! Again, you need to study history also. You’re Anti-Roman Catholicism seems to be clouding your examination of the historical facts and context. Also, studying more prophecy wouldn’t hurt either.The Albigensians were FAR MORE CHRISTLIKE than the heretics who felt they had a right to murder them. The Albigensians HURT NO ONE, but Rome has hurt many. You say I said saying they were more Christian than the “Christian church” is wrong. Excuse me fallacy meister, but you are ASSUMING what needs to be proven–that Rome IS “the Church”. You couldn’t prove that if your soul depended on it, and it does. What I have been posting–Biblical and historical FACTS papists HATE prove Rome cannot be what she claims. Rome’s history is EVIL, oppression, suppression, illiteracy and hate. Such a monster is not THE “church” but the bloody imposter we were warned about in Revelation 17, sporting herself as a Queen. You can’t deal with EVIDENCE, that is all.
You need to study history and Scripture some more…a lot more I think.The most anti-Catholic book ever written was the Bible, of which a study reveals to us what Rome really is–a religio-politco Institution bent on global domination. Yes, we KNOW what spirit she is of, desiring to lord it over others.
Not according to this recent article today.There were snipers in the nearby hills.