S
stringbeanduck
Guest
I just don’t see the justification in man forbiding let alone demonizing something God created and deemed good. To me that is all out disrespect to His creation.
It goes to show how inadequate man-made laws are in many situations. Some people get stuck at a point in the development of their consciences where they see everything in terms of “complying with the law” versus “breaking the law.” They can’t conceive of any situation where a man-made law can be wrong.I just don’t see the justification in man forbiding let alone demonizing something God created and deemed good. To me that is all out disrespect to His creation.
The use of a medical marijuana is not intrinsically evil; it has the good moral object of treating a medical disorder, and no concurrent evil moral object. (One act can have more than one moral object.) So use of a medical marijuana would be moral, if the intention and circumstances are good. Generally, the circumstances would have to include good consequences of substantial benefit in treating a severe medical disorder, because the bad consequences to the use of this drug are substantial (as some other posters noted above). If the good consequences outweigh the bad, and the intention is good, and there is no moral object, then the act is always moral.Are there any Church rulings, or thoughts on the Catholic Church or Catholics and medicinal marijuana? Just wondering as I have not seen this come up yet.
I am not picking on anyone here at all (sorry you posted it Ron - I have peaceful intentions)because the bad consequences to the use of this drug are substantial (as some other posters noted above).
I’d forgotten about biofeedback!! I went through training and I actually did learn to control my panic and fear about the pain I was in. (I wasn’t able to lower my pain level.) At first it was done with the biofeedback machine and I thought it was cool that I could sit there and consciously change the readings.Thanks for your story LS! I know where you have been - after I tried it all - even the meditation and bio-feedback - but like LS - I couldn’t break that pain cycle just long enough to clear my mind and focus on something else. Easier said than done when you don’t know how to meditate to began with - was my case. Now I can better manage with meditation - but only because MM helped do what NOTHING ELSE could - stop my symptoms cold in their tracks - ALL of them - even the ones caused by my other meds. Over a not so fun withdraw period - I had a moment with NO pain and it all changed from there. If i had just felt no pain once with my other interventions - it might have been enough. There just is no point but feeding Trillions of $$$$ into a system to make people like LS, myself, and others out here among us suffer through a system that does not know any better.
Hi Ron. I agree with you. I suppose there are people in pain who go straight to MM, or what they term “MM,” but they actually just decided to use it without ever finding out if any other med works. So they grow marijuana illegally and use it. I don’t think that is appropriate.The use of a medical marijuana is not intrinsically evil; it has the good moral object of treating a medical disorder, and no concurrent evil moral object. (One act can have more than one moral object.) So use of a medical marijuana would be moral, if the intention and circumstances are good. Generally, the circumstances would have to include good consequences of substantial benefit in treating a severe medical disorder, because the bad consequences to the use of this drug are substantial (as some other posters noted above). If the good consequences outweigh the bad, and the intention is good, and there is no moral object, then the act is always moral.
Similarly, with laws that would legalize medical marijuana, the good consequences must outweigh the bad. Unfortunately, when medical marijuana is legalized, the disorders for which it can be used tends to be very broad, resulting in bad consequences that perhaps outweigh the good consequences of treating some severe disorders.
That is a good point you’ve made. How can someone learn to meditate when he/she is in horrible chronic pain? I can’t do it. If I could be pain-free (oh wow would that be nice!!) for a little while I could perhaps learn to meditate. Then when the pain came back I would be better able to handle it.Thanks for your story LS! I know where you have been - after I tried it all - even the meditation and bio-feedback - but like LS - I couldn’t break that pain cycle just long enough to clear my mind and focus on something else. Easier said than done when you don’t know how to meditate to began with - was my case. Now I can better manage with meditation - but only because MM helped do what NOTHING ELSE could - stop my symptoms cold in their tracks - ALL of them - even the ones caused by my other meds. Over a not so fun withdraw period - I had a moment with NO pain and it all changed from there. If i had just felt no pain once with my other interventions - it might have been enough. There just is no point but feeding Trillions of $$$$ into a system to make people like LS, myself, and others out here among us suffer through a system that does not know any better.
I agree.I wouldn’t think that the Church would have a problem with it if it is being used medicinally.
I’m glad to see that you’re finally getting some good support here!I agree.![]()
I know I’ve already responded to this but I would like to add something. You have made the point that MM stopped ALL the symptoms, even the ones caused by the other meds. That is a very significant point.Thanks for your story LS! I know where you have been - after I tried it all - even the meditation and bio-feedback - but like LS - I couldn’t break that pain cycle just long enough to clear my mind and focus on something else. Easier said than done when you don’t know how to meditate to began with - was my case. Now I can better manage with meditation - but only because MM helped do what NOTHING ELSE could - stop my symptoms cold in their tracks - ALL of them - even the ones caused by my other meds. Over a not so fun withdraw period - I had a moment with NO pain and it all changed from there. If i had just felt no pain once with my other interventions - it might have been enough. There just is no point but feeding Trillions of $$$$ into a system to make people like LS, myself, and others out here among us suffer through a system that does not know any better.
It is wrong and a bad idea.Marajuana should become legal anyhow, not only for medical use. Half the country probably smokes it anyway, from all walks of life
These are the facts:This just stands out at me as another reason to legalize. Because of the lillegality of pot, growers are breeding the plant to be more and more potent so less amounts are needed to get really high. This creates problems like you see with “superhemp” or whatever they call it. Were it regulated, the government could ensure that such high concentrations of THC weren’t reached. Besides if it were privatized, companies would make SURE there were less concentrations so people who wanted to abuse it that badly would have to buy it in very large quanitities. Much like alcohol.
Secondly, I disagree very strongly with your statement about alcolics just stopping drinking. Some of my very close immediate familymemebers were alcoholics, and let me assure you that if an alcoholic could “just stop drinking” we’d have a very different conversation about the physical addictiveness of pot and alcohol. If a hardcore alcoholic “just quits drinking” they need severe medical supervision because it could cause their blood sugar to crash so low, they could die. This is why alcoholics typically have to go to (name removed by moderator)atient treatment centers.
Lastly, there’s a chart published by a university I want to show you. It rates the physical addictiveness of drugs against their harm to the body. Look at where nicotine (cigarettes), and alcohol are. Then look where cannabis is, and please explain to me the logic of why these drugs are legal, and church APPROVED, while marijuana (even if it were legal and used in moderation to relax and not lose one’s senses) is not. The truth is, legalizing pot would do far more good than it could possibly cause in harm. I don’t see Amsterdam crashing and burning.
http://www.udel.edu/chem/theopold/chem465/copland.udel.edu/~rmarcus/drug chart.gif
Marijuana should not be legalized but there is a form of medical marijuana that does not require smoking:From what two physicians (one is a pain specialist and anaesthesiologist, the other is in internal medicine) and a pharmacist have told me, I am in more danger from taking opiates than from ingesting marijuana. I don’t have a reference for this - this is what I have been told and I tend to agree. I know that the opiates have given me brain damage although I’ve been told it’s reversible, unlike brain damage that occurs with crack use.
There seem to be two groups in this thread: one, there is a group that likes pot, they want to use it, they feel it’s a good recreational drug; two, there is a group of people who need marijuana in order to control pain and nausea (among other effects of disease).
The first group needs to be on another thread.
Like you, I speak from experience. I’ve been trying to get off the opiates for a couple of years now, with little success. I can get down to two or three tablets a day (down from sixteen a day) but I can’t get off them completely. Opiates are great for the short-term. But I wasted so much time and money when on these drugs. I really did not know what I was doing. I had money - it is mostly gone and I don’t know where it went. I had time to start a Ph.D program but how could I do that when I was so stupid from drugs that I couldn’t even talk to someone coherently? Now it’s too late.
The federal government should legalize marijuana, at least for medical use, and stop going after physicians who are only trying to help their patients. Marijuana should be available by prescription in pharmacies. The current system is a mess.
I agree with you.
That article is at once hilarious and filled with bad science–it replaces sound data with anecdotes, it mistakes correlation for causation almost without exception, and it equates any usage with abuse taken to the extreme. Yawn.
So the Drug Enforcement Agency doesn’t impress you? You don’t trust them? How about data from the Drug Abuse Warning Network?That article is at once hilarious and filled with bad science–it replaces sound data with anecdotes, it mistakes correlation for causation almost without exception, and it equates any usage with abuse taken to the extreme. Yawn.
I’m certainly not impressed with what’s written there. Don’t accept what you think to be the conclusion. Think for yourself and ask yourself why the author is using certain terminology. For example, in the article you just posted from DAWN, look at the words “associated with” and ask yourself what that means. Do you really think that if someone comes in for treatment for drug abuse, and that person reports having used marijuana more frequently than cocaine, that that means that they are being treated for marijuana dependency? Come on… They are selectively framing the “data” by insinuation–that somehow because marijuana was “involved in” a situation, that it was the cause of the health effects or dependency. I am a lawyer and I can write literally anything to sound like that. I promise you I can, without lying, show an “association with” anything. For example, it is undisputed that 100% of all drivers who die in a car wreck were using rubber tires. So, no, I’m not impressed. Not at all.So the Drug Enforcement Agency doesn’t impress you? You don’t trust them? How about data from the Drug Abuse Warning Network?
whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/drugfact/marijuana/marijuana_ff.html#healtheffects
God bless,
Ed