I will ask you the question again in a respectful manner. What do you think the Catholic church has changed in the last century that would be considered throwing the baby out with the bath water?
Can you respond to me in a repectful manner as well? And you lost me again, what is the MP?
Dianne, I apologize for my terse words. This forum is entitled Tradtional Catholicism - which has, in my opinion, two meanings. One is the tradtional Catholicism of the numbers of young people who discovered indult TLM parishes in their dioceses and embraced the Mass of their parents and grandparents. These young people are able to provide concrete reasons for each and every one of the nuances of the TLM. They amaze me with their zeal.
The second group of traditional Catholics are those of us who grew up with the TLM and the practices of HMC before Vatican II.
The “nasty secret” of the years after Vatican II is that your average Catholic in the pew from 1965 to 1969 was not enamored of the changes that were being made. For many of us, our roots were being ripped out, shredded, and then thrown away. We submitted to the magesterium of HMC - which is now an alien concept.
The MP is the Motu Proprio promulgated last September by the Holy Father. It allows any priest in any diocese to say the Traditional Latin Mass or Extraordinary Form without having to seek the approval of his bishop. Many, many dioceses are now experiencing requests for and a growth of the faithful who wish to return to the Mass as it was before 1965, My diocese, unfortunately, is not one of them.
We drive (and have driven) 25 miles one way for the last 25 years to attend a reverent cathedral parish. I’ve sung in the cathedral choir for 22 years. I’ve sung when we were forbidden to sing anything in Latin. The English church has many exact translations of traditional Latin chants and many wonderful anthems and hymns but for a Catholic it is like taking a shower with a rain coat on. It took the Cardinal Archbishop of Lyons in 1992 at our parish’s 200th anniversary to give the Apostolic Blessing in Latin to stop the foolishness of no Latin. There was about 10 of us in the entire cathedral who knew the proper response. If that’s not sad, I don’t know what else is.
I am perfectly happy at my cathedral but four miles away is my geographic parish where one can’t even prepare oneself in quiet before Mass on Saturday afternoon to go to confession. Church has become a social hall and the prohibition against cutting up before the Blessed Sacrament is ignored by people older than I.
Father has been searching for someone to lead a schola at the cathedral. That gives me hope that he is at least thinking about a TLM. BTW, we had a children’s schola when I was in grade school and we kids learned and sang Latin for one Sunday Mass a month.
So, yes, when it comes to liturgy, there has been a huge shift in the last 40 years. Liturgical dance would have been unheard of in 1965.
I get frustrated on these threads when people who grew up with the OF forget that there are still large numbers of us who grew up with the EF still alive. Not all baby boomers hailed the changes of V II. I know I am not the only one on this forum that feels the same way.
I don’t see the MP as a reformation so much as I see it as a restoration. I hope this clarifies things.