Catholic Considering Islam

  • Thread starter Thread starter IrishDude45
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Post # 553 is beyond laughable

:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

Galatians 3

10 For as many as are of the works of the Law are under a curse; for it is written, “CURSED IS EVERYONE WHO DOES NOT ABIDE BY ALL THINGS WRITTEN IN THE BOOK OF THE LAW, TO PERFORM THEM.” <-----Deut. 27:26

11 Now that no one is justified by the Law before God is evident; for, “THE RIGHTEOUS MAN SHALL LIVE BY FAITH.” <------ Hab. 2:4

12 However, the Law is not of faith; on the contrary, “HE WHO PRACTICES THEM SHALL LIVE BY THEM.” <------ Lev. 18:5

13 Christ redeemed us from the curse of the Law, having become a curse for us—for it is written, “CURSED IS EVERYONE WHO HANGS ON A TREE”— <----13 Deut. 21:23

14 in order that in Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles, so that we would receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.
 
The above seems to be all wrong and vague refrences. Specially about Guru Nanak, the great Sikh leader. He was presented with honor in the court of King Babur. Guru Nanak was happy with babur and prayed and announced good news for Babur. How could he have said any bad word?
Who knows? We have to start with the evidence of what actually happened, even if it seems contradictory, and then try to explain it. Perhaps he changed his mind about Babur. Perhaps he was being diplomatic when invited to Babur’s court. Perhaps he regretted Babur’s atrocities but didn’t let that get in the way of recognizing Babur’s positive qualities as a ruler. Any of these are possible. The problem with your whole approach to history is that you start with dogmatic assumptions and then twist or ignore everything about history that doesn’t fit them. This attitude is unworthy of a lover of the truth.
**
**
The rest of the above post is all pagan history.
Why is that relevant? Again, you start by assuming that pagans never tell the truth. This insulates you from anything that might challenge your smug confidence in Islam. You are protecting yourself from the truth. You need to stop doing this if you want to live righteously and honestly.

You have read some of my posts in response to the anti-Islamic bigots on this forum. You know that I try to be fair to Islam. But I’m not going to whitewash your religion either.

Edwin
 
AsSalum o Aleikum Dear Brother Planten,
please dont think i am not willing to discuss with you further but i think the following poster, without the remarks, has addressed it again well.

I really think it is about having a heart for the law not whether we live up to it.

Allah is most merciful, His laws are true and absolute, humans dont do so well.
Because our hearts are for His law we turn to Him for mercy and heart wanting to be obedience, then He forgives us and saves us from the lake of fire.

Paul is very difficult reading for me (please dont everyone have your fits and bash me) i really have to slow down and look to the tora and OT writtings to understand where he was coming from.

I would challenge you to ask your self did i get my understanding just from reading his letters or did a man suggest to me what he was about and then i read them.

If i read in the latter mind i can see him as a potential trickster spreading false.

If i read with the attitude of “how can this be true” and like the other poster look back to the OT i see a shallow Jew emulating greek philosophic man who under went a supernatural change.

The change never made him perfect, by his own words he admits this.

He does not offer a recitation of truth just a personal sharing of what has been revealed in him.

Now i know some church groups who are very focused on Paul and dont bother much for the rest of the bible.

I would not recommend to people to do this because of the fruit i see.

Christians how ever would need to agree that Pauls writings can stand alone given Paul took the message to people who did not have the other 4 injeel people see today or a Jewish back ground and they were first called the Christians.

Now i am not denying Allahs love or mercy damming these people, just my experience is they appear (that’s outward) not the best example of what humans can be.

By His will may Allah bless and guide you and yours as youes submit unto Him
 
I don’t see how this makes him a “con-artist.” You just choose to describe what he did using pejorative terms–you have not actually shown that he did anything wrong in this instance (please do not start listing all the *other *things Muhammad did wrong–that is not the point here!).

Taking an already worshiped pagan god and transforming it into the Judeo-Christian God is not wrong? In the words of another nut job who created his own religion: If you want to get rich, you start a religion. How much easier would it be to get people to go on an empire building rampage than to say the supreme God told you to do it. You should be familiar how gods played a role in warfare during and even before Muhammad’s time.

Double standard. Apparently the Northwest Semites are allowed to have a generic name for “god” but the Semites of the Arabian peninsula aren’t. You actually made the point earlier that “al-ilah” was a generic word, so you are refuting yourself. It seems quite plausible to me that “El” and “Allah” are cognates (I know that there is some debate about this) and filled a somewhat similar function in both societies. Again, you have no case here.

But the Arabian Semites did not use it in a generic sense, but rather used al-ilah and variations of it to mean the chief god among other gods.

I’m not aware of having given you any information about what languages or alphabets I do or do not read. As a matter of fact you’re right–I do not know the Arabic or Syriac alphabets. I read Hebrew and could probably make some sense of an Aramaic text written in the Hebrew alphabet, but obviously that’s not the case here.

People who speak Aramaic, Assyrians of Iran and Iraq, stay true to their own heritage and use their own alphabet not Hebrew, so tough luck on that. Not to say Aramaic texts haven’t been translated with the Hebrew alphabet, but considering this is for worship purposes, Aramaic alphabet is used.

But you are avoiding the question. Evidence doesn’t have to be primary evidence–a statement by a scholar or by an authoritative figure within the Chaldean community would be enough.

I could have my priest do it, or even have the bishop write you a note, but why would I bother the bishop for you. That being said, Christians in Iraq whether they be Chaldean or Assyrian have adopted Arabic into their language, it being the main language. So as I stated before, certain phrases or sayings that include Allah are used but religiously when referring to God, Jesus is always used in place, either Maram or Maram Isho Messiakha. The Arabic “Allah” is not used in the Mass when referring to God. I’d love to see what a Middle East Christian says when you tell them that they are worshiping the same God as the Muslim. Watch the hate boil over, it’s insulting to say that. I mentioned it to my priest and he got mad, could be that he had his old seminary blown up. But still antagonism doesn’t change terminology.

If Middle Eastern Christians do use the term Allah or rather pronounced Al-a, it has more to do with cultural influence growing up in countries invaded by Arabs and Turks, but not as your claiming that they use it as acknowledgment as the God of Islam and Christianity is the same.
What does “more keen” mean? How keen or “un-keen” are Chaldaean communities outside Iraq? If this is primarily a practice of Chaldaeans living in Iraq, then its theological significance is diminished. If it is rooted in a theological conviction that “Allah” is not an appropriate name for the Christian God, then you would not expect Chaldaeans to start using “Allah” once they moved outside Iraq.

You missed the point on being more keen, Christians in Iraq both Assyrian and Chaldean are severely persecuted and slowly their religion and identity is being wiped out by the “peaceful” Islam and so they are keen in distinguishing themselves from Muslims religiously and culturally. Assyrians and Chaldeans who do move to the US or Europe keep their convictions, but more so for those stuck in that hell hole of Islam theocracy (I dare you defend Muslim treatment of Christians in Iraq and other areas, seeing how you’ve got a hard on for Muslims).
 
**
40.png
Contarini:
I do not accept the divine inspiration of the Qur’an. That should be obvious from my posts and from my declared affiliation (unless you are one of those paranoid maniacs who thinks that anyone who is slighly fair to Islam is a Muslim in disguise). The dependence of Muhammad on prior ideas is certainly relevant in refuting the Muslim claim that the Qur’an is a miracle and can only have been produced by direct divine inspiration. But it is also relevant in refuting your claim that Islam is really just repackaged paganism.

No, I don’t think you’re a Muslim in disguise, but you do have a hard on for them. What happen some Persian girl dump you and all your books you read on Islam to impress her went to waste so you’re using it here as a quasi-Muslim apologetic? I kid and I apologize, but for a white guy (I’m assuming your white) in America, you have to realize how Christians under Islamic rule feel and we could care less what you say, we’ve experienced Muslim treatment first hand, and your books aren’t going to change any of that.

Here’s your dilemma: if you argue that Muhammad’s roots are primarily pagan, you strengthen the Islamic case, because most of us are going to be very impressed that a pagan could come up with something so close to Biblical religion. But if you argue that his ideas were largely “stolen” from Biblical religion and grafted onto pagan roots (which is clearly true, I think), you no longer have a case for Allah being a “different god.” In fact, you have no such case however you argue it. The evidence is squarely against you either way.

I argue the latter and how is it I or anyone else can no longer have a case for Allah being a different god? Lets put it this way, I am well trained and versed in Judaism and Christianity, I know that my culture believes in various pagan gods, chief among them is Tatu, we use Tatu as a generic term for the god, but he is the chief god among all gods. To convert my people to my beliefs and use them effectively to dominate a continent, I claim that Tatu’s angel came to me and gave me this book called the Klips and in the Klips I have taken verses and themes from the Bible and added my own parts about sleeping with 9 year old girls and killing or subjugating people who don’t believe and accept Tatu (your so called truths!). As I conquer many lands my language and terminology, especially Tatu being used as God, come to be the primary source of communication. And the hardest part to do all this was taking a chief pagan god and transforming him or it into a monotheistic god.

Thousands of years pass and with my made up religion millions are murdered and oppressed and a white man named Edwin fights tirelessly and with conviction defending my lies. Thank you, Edwin, the Prophet MoMo (peace be upon me thanks you), you shall have your 84 virgins! Praise be to Tatu.

On a side note, I am dying laughing at how ridiculously stupid my made up religion is, it’d be a real laugh riot if it wasn’t an actual religion.

And Edwin, if you are defending truths found in Islam, don’t forget that those truths come from Judaism and Christianity, the elements lifted from the Bible. I would like you to defend the other “truths” that are exclusive to Islam, you know the ones, that you see on the front cover of the New York Times and the main story on Al Jazzera.

I’m interested in refuting your blasphemous and heretical claims about Allah not being our God. I am of course on your side with regard to the issue of whether the Qur’an is divinely inspired as Muslims claim. But they are two separate issues.I have not at any point suggested that Islam was true. I do not believe Islam to be true over against Christianity and Judaism. (Obviously it contains elements of truth.)Your anti-Islamic polemic would be more credible if you would refrain from accusing anyone who disagrees with you of being a Muslim. I have no interested in defending the truth *of *Islam, but I have every interest in defending the truth *in *Islam and the truth *about *Islam.

Edwin

And it’s not blasphemy or heretical for claiming Allah is not my God. How is this for heresy, Christ is True God, Allah is a pagan god turned into a monotheistic god based on the Judeo-Christian tradition by the creative imagination of a camel jockey (at least I think that was his job, oh wait it was marrying older rich woman and taking their money and using it to build up and army to spread his peaceful religion). You get your carpet out Edwin and worship Allah, I’ll stick to worshiping Jesus Christ and proclaiming Him the only True God rather than kissing Islam’s ***, get your chap stick and pucker up. **
 
Why would you want to leave the Catholic church which is the one true church founded by Christ himself and become a Muslim only to worship a false god? It is not our Lord who is leading you to Islam, it is the enemy.
 
**The above seems to be all wrong and vague refrences. Specially about Guru Nanak, the great Sikh leader. He was presented with honor in the court of King Babur. Guru Nanak was happy with babur and prayed and announced good news for Babur. How could he have said any bad word?

The rest of the above post is all pagan history.**
my dear friend, please read the history of guru nanak and then speak.I will not waste my time posting about india during nanaks time.

secondly, what u call pagan history is what was written during the times of the mughal emperors.it is explicitly mentioned abou the no of hindus killed during the reign of each
and every mughal emperor.
Lastly by calling facts pagan history, U are denying history itself.Being an Indian, I am saddened by your comments,are you trying to say that the research done by some of the better know historian is wrong?
**
Have you even taken the trouble of going thru just one of those books mentioned in here?

BTW,I am not surprise by your comments, muslims have this habit of denying all wrongdoing by people of their faith,your just following your people…**
 
AsSalum o Aleikum Dear Brother Planten,
please dont think i am not willing to discuss with you further but i think the following poster, without the remarks, has addressed it again well.

I really think it is about having a heart for the law not whether we live up to it.

Allah is most merciful, His laws are true and absolute, humans dont do so well.
Because our hearts are for His law we turn to Him for mercy and heart wanting to be obedience, then He forgives us and saves us from the lake of fire.


Paul is very difficult reading for me (please dont everyone have your fits and bash me) i really have to slow down and look to the tora and OT writtings to understand where he was coming from.

I would challenge you to ask your self did i get my understanding just from reading his letters or did a man suggest to me what he was about and then i read them.

If i read in the latter mind i can see him as a potential trickster spreading false.

If i read with the attitude of “how can this be true” and like the other poster look back to the OT** i see a shallow Jew emulating greek philosophic man **who under went a supernatural change.

The change never made him perfect, by his own words he admits this.

He does not offer a recitation of truth just a personal sharing of what has been revealed in him.

**Now i know some church groups who are very focused on Paul and dont bother much for the rest of the bible.

I would not recommend to people to do this because of the fruit i see**.
**I agree with you if I understand you. I have highlighted those good words in blue above.

Paul was a fruad. He went to Greece and tried to preach his own philosophy to the Greeks who did not know anything about the Jews customs. The teachings of Jesus were needed practically to be spread. Not any new philosophy**.
Christians how ever would need to agree that Pauls writings can stand alone given Paul took the message to people who did not have the other 4 injeel people see today or a Jewish back ground and they were first called the Christians.
Now i am not denying Allahs love or mercy damming these people, just my experience is they appear (that’s outward) not the best example of what humans can be.
** By His will may Allah bless and guide you and yours as youes submit unto Him **
**I am thankful to you for speaking the truth. We Muslims know that Paul is nobody near to Jesus except as a known killer of the innocent early followers of Jesus. Jesus never said a word about Paul’s conversion and we have no good certificate for paul except by his own mouth.

Jesus never came back to any one of his true disciples even in a dream to twll them that Paul had converted.

I know the church is noting all my objections and they soon devise some textual changes in the bible Nt to bring about some suitable cure to do away with these pbjections. They are making suiatble (illegal) changes in the text of the bibleNt daily**.
 
my dear friend, please read the history of guru nanak and then speak.I will not waste my time posting about india during nanaks time.
franki, I know more about Guru Nanak than you. he was originally a Hindu. He was a saint and Unitarian. He did not worship idols. He converted to islam and performed Hajj (twice?). He prayed and told babur that his children will rule India for seven (7) generations. His followers are nowadays called SIKHS. When Guru Nanak died there was tussle between Hindus and Muslims whether he should be burnt or buried… I hope you will try to see some rela history of that honest good man.
secondly, what u call pagan history is what was written during the times of the mughal emperors.it is explicitly mentioned abou the no of hindus killed during the reign of each
and every mughal emperor.
** What I call pagan history is the prejudiced writings of the Hindu writers. They blamed some Muslim kings and praised the other Muslim kings. That has no value.**
Lastly by calling facts pagan history, U are denying history itself.Being an Indian, I am saddened by your comments,are you trying to say that the research done by some of the better know historian is wrong?
**
Have you even taken the trouble of going thru just one of those books mentioned in here?
BTW,I am not surprise by your comments, muslims have this habit of denying all wrongdoing by people of their faith,your just following your people…**
** I have told you that those Hindu historians were prejudiced against any work of the Muslims even though the Msulim let them live happily in the kingdom. But they kept on revolting and there were tussles at times. that is nobody’ business to discuss here**.
 
Who knows? We have to start with the evidence of what actually happened, even if it seems contradictory, and then try to explain it.
That is good
Perhaps he changed his mind about Babur. Perhaps he was being diplomatic when invited to Babur’s court. Perhaps he regretted Babur’s atrocities but didn’t let that get in the way of recognizing Babur’s positive qualities as a ruler. Any of these are possible. The problem with your whole approach to history is that you start with dogmatic assumptions and then twist or ignore everything about history that doesn’t fit them. This attitude is unworthy of a lover of the truth.
**
**
**Too many perhaps (please forgive me) will bring down the good reputation of that great man Guru Nanak. It is true that he stopped worshipping the idols of the Hindus. He went to Makkah too. He was a great Saint having communion (link) with God. The Hindus had disowned him in his daily life and did not like him… I can give some examples.

When he appeared before king babur, he was much honored. He told king babur that his children will rule in India upto seven (7) generations. How did he know that?? Unless he was a true man of God**.
Why is that relevant? Again, you start by assuming that pagans never tell the truth. This insulates you from anything that might challenge your smug confidence in Islam. You are protecting yourself from the truth. You need to stop doing this if you want to live righteously and honestly
.

** I will never say that pagans never tell the truth. There are good persons in all nations. I do not deny that. I promise you that i will try to do my best in telling the truth even if it goes against me.**
You have read some of my posts in response to the anti-Islamic bigots on this forum. You know that I try to be fair to Islam. But I’m not going to whitewash your religion either.
** I admire (and I hope I have done that in my posts) your good work and truthfulness. that is why I said that some people must tell the truth. Otherwise, the wrong ones will have open field and holiday to spread falsehood. I admire you, surely and truely.

If I said anything contrary to the above, I am ready to apologise from you.**
 
Paul was a fruad.
AsSalum o Aleikum
No Bro thats not what i said.
It is not for me to place judgement on a man who’s part words i have some account of many generations later.

I dont know him personal so cant even use the ability to discern that Allah gives us.

The Quran teaches some Christians were in error and some were not.

So i respect that if Christians say Paul is good source of The Teacher then it is so for them now and Allahs truth will be their judge on the last day.

I do encourage all Christians to look beyond his words and most do already. In fact some seem to have trouble following that his words should be able to stand alone for Christians.

By His will may Allah bless and guide you and yours as youes submit unto Him.
 
Jesus never said a word about Paul’s conversion
This is interesting, i could see that a Christian could argue Paul showing up has as much foundation as being the comforter as some Muslims believe Mahomad (pbuh) was announced in the bible.
 
Good and true point. But some christians want to keep their side absolutely good while they throw mud on others. I agree with you. It may be a bitter pill for some christians to swallow.

Showing truth is not mud throwing, but unfortunately you dont want to see that. How sad.

**I would agree with you 100% about Mary Magd. But I will never agree with you about Paul. I had to bring the case of Mary Magd pouring oil on the head of Jesus because some christian was getting out of control and bringing out false reports about our dear ones. Otherwise I respect Mary Magd. She was with Jesus. Jesus approved of her works. There is nothing wrong about mary Magd.

But such is not the case of Pual or saul the killer who never met Jesus**.

What do you know of Paul? you may not have read much of him, But here are few points you should know. As Saul he was the highest educated person of his time of the top most university. As being most literate, he did not accept these new teachings of Jesus and hence troubled and killed a lot of Christians of that era. So how could a person of such standing suddenly change and accept Christianity? Unlike Mohammed who was illiterate, who took someone as an Angel?

** I have given my opinion about Mary magd and paul above. There is no change. Mary did not spoil the faith. But Paul did very much, going to Greece and modifying the teachings of Jesus and the practice of Jesus (and all his disciples) and eating the flesh of swine and saying “Law was a curse”. I am sorry. I cannot go near Paul. He is not a saint at all.**
You are wrong in that context too and I bet you hve been reading a lot of Deedats books thats what is wrong with the thinking of muslims. Read all Pauls letters again and try to understand the messages, and you will know that they are all spiritually guided ones.
 
Salaamu Alaykum,
I’ve only posted in this thread (and this forum) once before. I thought that this thread was initiated by an Irish Catholic who said he was considering converting to Islam. All I have seen from both sides is bickering, sneering, misquoting, and contextless apologetics. As a representitive of my faith, I posted to IrishDude45 what I love about my faith, its history and the blessings it has brought to my life.

It’s intersting what we are both claiming, namely our Christianity and Islam, when our posts show an inherent lack thereof.

Whilst you claim to follow the teachings of Christ, I see little of the mercy, eloquence of tongue, patience and forbearance of Christ (Peace be on him). Do you not read Matthew 5:44?
“But I tell you: Love your enemies, and pray for those who persecute you”. Commenting on this passage Dostoevsky said it is easy to love your friend, but to love your enemy…

Muslims, do we not also claim to be the heirs of Christ’s teachings, and the followers of Muhammad (Peace and blessings be on both of them). Do we not read Surah Aali-Imran, (The Amramites 3:159)?
“It is part of the Mercy of God that thou dost deal gently with them Wert thou severe or harsh-hearted, they would have broken away from about thee: so pass over (Their faults)…”

There are countless other examples in both our literatures, from the tale of the Good Samaritan, the Christians of Najran…

So, in what I hope will be a renewed respect, and spirit of warm dialogue, I wish to share with you (IrishDude45) and the forum at large, another account from the history of my faith, and the earnestness of faith under persecution of its earliest followers. The account is alluded to in the Quran, in Surah Al-Tawba (Repentance 9:40):
“If ye help not (your Leader) (it is no matter): for God did indeed help him; when the unbelievers drove him out: he had no more than one companion: they two were in the cave, and he said to his companion “Have no Fear, for God is with us”: then God sent down His peace upon him, and strengthened him with forces which ye saw not, and humbled to the depths the word of the those who reject Faith…”

It was the year of the Hijrah (Emmigration) from Mecca to Yathrib, a period in Islamic history when Muhammad (peace be upon him), and many of the Muslims of Mecca had to leave because of the great persecution they suffered there. (I’ve adapted it from Ling’s biography of Muhammad (pbuh).
Muhammad (pbuh) and Abu Bakr left for Yathrib together. The night of their departure, Muhammad (pbuh), Abu Bakr and his son Abd Allah mounted two camels. As they had planned, they made for a cave in the Mount of Thawr a little to the south, on the way to the Yemen - for they knew that as soon as the Muhammad’s (pbuh) absence was discovered, search parties would be sent out to cover all the northern outskirts of the city. When they reached the cave, Abu Bakr sent his son home with the camels, telling him to listen to what was said in Mecca the next day when the Muhammad’s (pbuh) absence was discovered, and to bring them word of it the following night.
On the third day, the silence of their mountain sanctuary was broken by the sound of birds - a pair of rock doves they thought - cooing and fluttering their wings outside the cave. Then after a while, they heard the faint sound of men’s voices, at some distance below them but gradually growing louder as if the men were climbing up the side of the mount. They were not expecting Abd Allah until after nightfall, and there were still some hours to go before sunset, although in fact there was strangely little light in the cave for the time of day they supposed it to be. The voices were now not far off - five or six men at least - and they were still approaching. The Prohpet looked at Abu Bakr, and said: Grieve not for verily God is with us.[1] And then he said: “What thinkest thou of two when God is their third?” [2]
They could now hear the sound of steps, which drew nearer and then stopped: the men were standing outside the cave. They spoke decisively, all in agreement that there was no need to enter the cave, since no one could possibly be there. Then they turned back the way they had come.
When the sound of their retreating steps and voices had died away, Muhammad (pbuh) and Abu Bakr went to the mouth of the cave. There in front of it, almost covering the entrance, was an acacia tree, about the height of a man, which had not been there that morning; and over the gap that was left between the tree and the wall of the cave a spider had woven its web. They looked through the web, and there in the hollow of a rock, even where a man might step as he entered the cave, a rock dove had made a nesting place and was sitting close as if she had eggs, with her mate perched on a ledge not far above.
[1] Quran: (9:40)
[2] Hadith: Bukhari.LVII, 5.
The moral is that God always protects the honest and true, and He alone can protect and guide us. His Mercy encompasses all.
I leave you again with a prayer. This time (speaking of the Yemen - Najran and the cave at Thaur) a prayer from the mountains of Yemen at Tarim, “Allah Ya Maulana, Rabbi-shrahli sadri” - God our Protector, Lord Open My Heart. I envy the purity of their faith (like that of Abu Bakr), and the purity of their love for God, free from bickering and disputes.
youtube.com/watch?v=onUDpcNpaPg
as-Salaamu Alaykum
 
Similar interesting thing 4 me recently, was discussing with a brother who is Eastern Catholic, he was of the opinion the Catechism teaching that says Catholics adore the same God is not accepted by them.

I had previously thought a Catholic was to believe the same as Catechism.

I am still not sure i started another thread to check it out, i am not scholarly so cant discern yes or no.
 
Please note what Jesus said and what Saul said. See below:

17"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. 19Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.
mathew 5:17
=================================================
The above were the words of Jesus
.

Now see what Paul says below:

10 All who rely on observing the law are under a curse, for it is written: “Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do everything written in the Book of the Law.”[c] 11Clearly no one is justified before God by the law, because, “The righteous will live by faith.”[d] 12 The law is not based on faith
; on the contrary, “The man who does these things will live by them.”[e] 13Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written: “Cursed is everyone who is hung on a tree.”[f]
galatians 3.

**1. Please see the difference. Paul is saying that Christ redeemed all christians from the curse of the law. he is admitting that Mosaic law is a curse. ( Iam sure this is a horribly bad statement from Paul about a law which was sacred and given by YHWH.)
  1. That whoever is hung on a tree is cursed ( It means whoever dies on a cross is cursed.).
  2. Thereby, Paul is admitting that Jesus was a cursed person.
We all know that curse is always from God, not from men. Any one who is cursed is far away from the mecy and blessings and love of the Lord. Jesus had a God and he had a Lord too.

Paul has done more damage here by telling every one that they will be saved by the faith alone. There is no need to follow any law and no need to do any good deeds.

What type of a man was that Saul of Tarsus? Niether God, nor any peophet had taught any such thing to their nation that they do not need to do any good deeds under the law. It is clear that paul has condemned the law of Moses here, while Jesus uphelp that law. Fulfilling the law does not mean abondoning that law. It means retaining it and improving it. .

Did Jesus know that law is not based on faith? He did not say such thing. We all know that there is no faith without any law. Paul has misled the whole christian nation. I am sure, sensible christians cannot have both. They can have jesus or they can have paul.

I recently read notes on the net of very highly educated person of many faiths who condemned Paul for doing all the damage to christianity.

**
Did Paul hate the law? no!

Romans 7:12 - Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.
Romans 7:22 - For I delight in the law of God after the inward man.

**What is the curse of the law? **
Attempting to gain salvation by following the Torah on your own without faith, and inevitably failing at some point, is the “curse of the Law.”

James the brother of Jesus wrote about this too
James 2:10 - For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.

This is why Paul writes that you are saved through faith by the grace of god.

** Do Christians not have to do good works because we are saved? Nope**

James 2:20 faith without works is dead

We are not saved by works but by the grace of god yet if we posses faith and do not act upon it in a good way then our faith is dead. Now do you understand planteen?Paul said that the law alone cannot save you because no man can keep it perfectly enough so this is why the grace of god is required.
 
Did Paul hate the law? no!

Romans 7:12 - Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.
Romans 7:22 - For I delight in the law of God after the inward man.

**What is the curse of the law? **
Attempting to gain salvation by following the Torah on your own without faith, and inevitably failing at some point, is the “curse of the Law.”

James the brother of Jesus wrote about this too
James 2:10 - For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.

This is why Paul writes that you are saved through faith by the grace of god.

** Do Christians not have to do good works because we are saved? Nope**

James 2:20 faith without works is dead

We are not saved by works but by the grace of god yet if we posses faith and do not act upon it in a good way then our faith is dead. Now do you understand planteen?Paul said that the law alone cannot save you because no man can keep it perfectly enough so this is why the grace of god is required.
**Deus, you are saying the same thign as we Muslims believe. Faith without works is useless. And works without faith is also useless. Paul should have known that. But he taught you will be saved by faith alone.

You are forgetting why the christians have abondoned the sabath and circumcision and started eating the flesh of swine and so many other things. It is evident that they are no more under the law, So please tell me who has done that? Is that not Paul? He had discarded the law calling it a curse. If he did not teach that then please tell me why you do not follow the law of Moses any more? Jesus and his mother Mary and all disciple sof Jesus were living under the law.

You are wandering around the point and not coming to the point. Please admit that some one has released you from the law of Moses. It was not done by Jesus. Tell me who had done that? Thanks.**
 
Similar interesting thing 4 me recently, was discussing with a brother who is Eastern Catholic, he was of the opinion the Catechism teaching that says Catholics adore the same God is not accepted by them.

I had previously thought a Catholic was to believe the same as Catechism.

I am still not sure i started another thread to check it out, i am not scholarly so cant discern yes or no.
That’s right, the CCC teaches in error, the Church is fallible and Vatican II teaches error, the Church seized to be infallible starting with VC II.

Go here Steven John to see why:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=5682085#post5682085
 
they failed to realize that the Holy Trinity and allah clash and that Islam vehemently denies the Trinity and divinity of Christ.
You seriously think that the Council Fathers didn’t know that Muslims deny the Trinity?

What you have not addressed is the obvious fact that Jews also deny the Trinity.

Edwin
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top