T
Tietjen
Guest
I can, in fact, understand this argument. HOWEVER, the OP, in his second post, clarified that these people were NOT his superiors but rather his peers.In my experience as someone who spent a great deal of time in youth ministry before my marriage, I see the following.
Feel free to appeal the command, but obey it in the interim.
- The OP’s behavior with his girlfriend is not wrong. (It might be irritating, might not, but it’s not wrong.)
- The OP has been told by his superiors in the ministry to stop.
- He should stop. He should stop, not because his behavior is wrong, but because he has been told to. Calling your girlfriend pet names isn’t wrong. Disobedience is.
After all, St. Teresa of Avila was ordered to keep her visions quiet and to flat-out ignore them. She did, though she knew her visions were true and accurate and of God. And Our Lord told her that that obedience of hers to her confessor pleased Him exceedingly.
Yet there are those who continued to critize him up to and including questioning whether or not he and his girlfriend should even be allowed to assist within this ministry!First, when I mentioned leaders these are my peers in the group and actually I happen to have a little more authority over them.
It appears that the argument over this situation on the grounds of obedience to authority is a non-issue. In that both you and I are in agreement that “the OP’s behavior with his girlfriend is not wrong” perhaps you can see where I’m coming from. Obviously there are those who simply cannot accept that teens may hear the word “sweetheart” and will object regardless, but I find the issue rather silly and stand by my original reply to the OP.