P
Pax_et_Bonum
Guest
I NEVER compared those two aspects of this situation. Only that children were not being believed. That’s all.
Agreed - nothing else here to be said.
~Liza
I NEVER compared those two aspects of this situation. Only that children were not being believed. That’s all.
Agreed - nothing else here to be said.
~Liza
Well, I assume that there’s more than the two of them in the class. We have no idea what the other students heard or didn’t hear. It is interesting that out of the entire class only her friend is publicly backing her up…It bears further investigation especially when a student asked him to clarify his remarks and he apparently did in front of a witness.
I think the best possible result would be for the teacher to stand in front of the class and say.“for the record,I DO believe in the Resurrection,I am sorry if some of you misunderstood”.Case closed.
Who’s to say this didn’t happen after the article was published?Why the reluctance?.
" It is interesting that out of the entire class only her friend is publicly backing her up…"Well, I assume that there’s more than the two of them in the class. We have no idea what the other students heard or didn’t hear. It is interesting that out of the entire class only her friend is publicly backing her up…
Who’s to say this didn’t happen after the article was published?
AMEN, AMEN, AMENNAB 1 Corinthians 15: 1-21 - Pretty clear to me.
2 Through it you are also being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you, unless you believed in vain.
- Now I am reminding you, brothers, of the gospel I preached to you, which you indeed received and in which you also stand.
3 For I handed on to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the scriptures;
4 that he was buried; that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the scriptures;
5 that he appeared to Kephas, then to the Twelve.
6 After that, he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at once, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep.
7 After that he appeared to James, then to all the apostles.
8 Last of all, as to one born abnormally, he appeared to me.
9 For I am the least of the apostles, not fit to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God.
10 But by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace to me has not been ineffective. Indeed, I have toiled harder than all of them; not I, however, but the grace of God (that is) with me.
11 Therefore, whether it be I or they, so we preach and so you believed.
12 But if Christ is preached as raised from the dead, how can some among you say there is no resurrection of the dead?
13 If there is no resurrection of the dead, then neither has Christ been raised.
14 And if Christ has not been raised, then empty (too) is our preaching; empty, too, your faith.
15 Then we are also false witnesses to God, because we testified against God that he raised Christ, whom he did not raise if in fact the dead are not raised.
16 For if the dead are not raised, neither has Christ been raised,
17 and if Christ has not been raised, your faith is vain; you are still in your sins.
18 Then those who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished.
19 If for this life only we have hoped in Christ, we are the most pitiable people of all.
20 But now Christ has been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep.
21 For since death came through a human being, the resurrection of the dead came also through a human being.
Praise Jesus Christ who has been resurrected.
Here are some of the comments made on youtube,at least one by a teacher:" It is interesting that out of the entire class only her friend is publicly backing her up…"
How do YOU know that-are you prescient?
By the way he said this to the whole class
.She quotes the School Mission Statement,Blessed Pope John Paul II,the Catechism of the Catholic Church,Holy Scripture:John Chapter 11 verse 2,Acts Chapter 2 verse 32.
This girl is no crank and we have NOT heard the end of this.She asked the rhetorical question,"Do I contact the Bishop and let him know that heresy is being taught in a Catholic school?."She also says,"One day I want to be a real Catholic teacher in a real Catholic school.For this I pray,God Bless you.
Sincere you betcha.
See for Yourself
youtube.com/watch?v=l9AdddpFkKI&feature=player_embedded
Seriously? Adults don’t sue children over silly issues like this. And besides, while I don’t know the Canadian system, in the US he’s have to show some kind of damages. Do you really think a handful of upset people commenting on the internet is going to be considered “damages” by any court?Golly you really are getting desperate aren’t you?Obviously after this devout Catholic girl was upset enough top go on youtube the whole school knows ergo a retraction or clarification should be made in front of the class.Better yet the teacher could do so on youtube if he was so adamant that he was misquoted.
Why doesn’t he sue her for slander.?He obviously denied saying he did not believe in the resurrection to the chaplain and principal as that would be denying THE tenet of Catholicism in a Catholic school.The consequences would be severe for proselytizing.
“Who’s to say this didn’t happen after the article was published?”
For starters, I doubt lifesitenews would report it. Secondly, you keep asking why the teacher hasn’t done this or that. The fact is that you have no idea what’s happened outside of a single article.Who’s to say it did?I’m sure the same media outlet would have reported it,HAD IT HAPPENED.
We only have a single article. In that single article only her friend is produced as a witness." It is interesting that out of the entire class only her friend is publicly backing her up…"
How do YOU know that-are you prescient?
If he actually said it then someone else needs to stand up.By the way he said this to the whole class
How do you know anything about this girl? She could be a saint. She could be a malcontent. She could be somewhere in between. We don’t know.This girl is no crank and we have NOT heard the end of this.
For starters I guess you haven’t read all the thread.Guess where I got the story from which certainly gives it validity? Go check past episodes of Catholic TV.Seriously? Adults don’t sue children over silly issues like this. And besides, while I don’t know the Canadian system, in the US he’s have to show some kind of damages. Do you really think a handful of upset people commenting on the internet is going to be considered “damages” by any court?
For starters, I doubt lifesitenews would report it. Secondly, you keep asking why the teacher hasn’t done this or that. The fact is that you have no idea what’s happened outside of a single article.
They are? And how do you know that? I have friends who teach in high schools, the kids aren’t afraid of them.These are kids-frightened of authority
Yes, out of a classroom full of students her one witness on record is her friend.-she had the courage to do something about it and she has a witness.
I wouldn’t say it doesn’t count. However, out of a classroom full of students only these two friends are on record as saying the teacher denied the resurrection. The teacher says he never said that, the school investigated and determined he doesn’t deny the resurrection.The witness doesn’t count because she;s 17?
I’m not condemning her story. I simply don’t see a reason to automatically take her side and condemn the teacher as some posters have done.Why are you in such a rush to condemn her story?
Hardly. I really don’t care one way or the other, I just fail to see the reason everyone was so quick to assume the teacher was guilty.Because you’ve painted yourself into a corner?
I don’t consider Michael Voris/Catholic TV to be reliable. And sorry, its simply not that easy to sue for slander/libel. You have to prove the speaker/publisher either knew the info was false or spoke/published with reckless disregard. And then in addition to that, you have to prove some kind of damages.It was reported by Michael Voris of Catholic TV and Lifesite news both of whom are in the habit of checking out the veracity of someone’s claims lest they be SUED.
What gives it validity?For starters I guess you haven’t read all the thread.Guess where I got the story from which certainly gives it validity? Go check past episodes of Catholic TV.
You didn’t even address the point where you said it couldn’t have been printed by Lifesite and I embarrassed you by showing you Lifesite did publish it in post number one which you very obviously did not read.In trying to save face that’s the best ya got?What gives it validity?