Catholic Polygamy

  • Thread starter Thread starter StephenKent
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
How about some of those references people have been asking you for?

Gonna get to those any time soon?

How about answering the question about JS practicing polygamy for 5 yrs before the “revelation” was made public?

We’ve got time, we’ll wait.
We could play spin the bottle but can we start with the great apostasy question? Why? Because without proving a great apostasy, all the Joseph Smith tales matter not.

Question: what proof is there of a great apostasy in the early church? :confused:
 
You have already closed your minds to learn a different perspective. I would have loved to learn from you.
Do you mean the perspective that makes unfounded statments such as the Catholic Church approved of polygamy until 1134? Do you expect people to take you seriously when you make statements such as this and then fail to provide any source for your information? Just what is it that you think we need to learn from you and what is it that you desire to learn from us?
 
Are you telling your relatives that Catholics were permitted to marry polygamously in 1650 due to a shortage of men?
I will answer this before I leave. No I am not going to teach this. Since learning about it from you and other sources that confirm what you were saying, then it would be lying to do so. You know I really believe that most people try to do good. I believe that this is because the light of Christ is given to all mankind. What is sad is when man turns against that light to do evil. I believe that the Catholic church has many good people in it. I have many friends who are Catholic. We have many things in common. I believe that for us to progress the kingdom of God on earth it is going to take all those who believe in doing good. May God bless you all.
 
I believe that Joseph Smith was a prophet of God. You do not. I accept that.
That’s what I strive to do. I accept that people of faith do not have the same beliefs. Recognizing that’s just a fact of life on this earth, is why I strive to concentrate on what unites us more than on what divides. No doubt as a child of God but a human, I fail at this myself at times I am sure. In any case may God bless you as well. And His peace be with you always along your journey.
 
This is your realible source? You can read that it was rumored, whispered? This is not evidence at all. This is the wagging tongues of people. And Oliver Cowderys statement was not in reference to the so called relationship with Fanny. See you are taking statements from people who would love nothing more than to destroy my faith. Lucky for me I do not rely on them for my faith. I rely on Christ. I do not rely on Joseph Smith for my faith. I rely on Christ. Now I would love some dialog with you without all the accusations. If you have some sincere questions, I would love to answer them.
Do you think truth has the effect of “destroying your faith”? Interesting.
 
I have spoken with many ex mormons. I have heard so many horror stories about how they were treated or how home teachers pestered them or some story about a church leader telling them some wierd practice or doctrine. I have been a member all my life although I was inactive for most of them younger years until I was about 22. I have had none of these experiences that I have been told about. It is foreign to me. I have had discussions with those who pose as mormons and ex mormons to get their agendas heard, only to be lying about their identity. As I have stated some people believe it does not matter what they do if it is in the name of Jesus. So perhaps Rebecca has inside information, but it is her perspective, and since she has left, things may have been forgotten or twisted. Maybe not. I came here not to give battle. I thought that because born agains give you guys a hard time that perhaps I could have some thoughtful discussions here. I see that I was wrong. Not the first time. I feel bad that you have such a negative feelings towards my faith. I can see that as tempting as it is to take each point and discuss them, it would do me little good. You have already closed your minds to learn a different perspective. I would have loved to learn from you.
Somehow I always end up getting referenced to in the third person. 😃

I was a Mormon a long time ago. I was taught in Mormon meetings what Mormons now call anti-Mormon. 🤷 I’m ok with it, as, I do have some fond memories and most of my family, who I love, are LDS.

There is truth going on here. It is what it is. I have no reason to make things up.

I also understand and accept that you believe what you believe. Better that you do than go the way of many Mormons, into atheism.

The alternative is, Christ’s Church never failed. I think that is more of an important consideration than anything Smith could have done. Mormons just seem to accept that Christ failed. I’ll never understand why.

Peace be with you.
 
This right here is the crux of the matter, fatboys:
Yes, I know this is what you believe. TPG responded as he did because you didn’t address what I said, at all. You just bore your testimony. Granted, it is important to you, but it holds no meaning for us. No more than our testimony of Jesus Christ and our surety in His Love and Mercy, including guiding His Church until “the end of the age”, means anything to you.

So, you think you prayed and God told you Jesus was a god among many gods? I find that impossible to believe. Why? Because it doesn’t align at all, to Who Jesus says He is. It is a god of your (or Smith’s) making.
For somebody who claims to be “skeptical of everything LDS”, I’m sure you can appreciate that your testimony doesn’t demonstrate to us, in any way, the validity of what you’re saying.
I could stand up on my soapbox and scream to the world that I know the Bible is true, that it’s the infallible word of God, that I know that His Holiness, Benedict XVI is the true successor of St. Peter, that I know Jesus Christ is truly God in the Flesh, and that the Holy Catholic Church is the Church of Jesus Christ, and yet none of that would in any way convince you of what I’m saying nor should it!
I think I hear an ex mormon from Texas getting ready to speak. :hmmm:

If we are going off topic, can I ask for proof of a “great apostasy”? :bigyikes:
😃 How dare you drag levity to this thread.
You didn’t see my question mark I guess.
Given that your previous posts in this thread have been used as covert opportunities to advocate same-sex marriage, and that the post in question was nothing more than “Wow 1134? It took a long time.” It’s readily apparent that you picked up fatboys fumble and ran with it. I may very well be wrong, and if I am I’ll graciously apologize, but I think your posting history coupled with the explicit words of your post demonstrate well that the way I read your post is exactly how you intended it to be read.
 
I have spoken with many ex mormons. I have heard so many horror stories about how they were treated or how home teachers pestered them or some story about a church leader telling them some wierd practice or doctrine. I have been a member all my life although I was inactive for most of them younger years until I was about 22. I have had none of these experiences that I have been told about. It is foreign to me. I have had discussions with those who pose as mormons and ex mormons to get their agendas heard, only to be lying about their identity. As I have stated some people believe it does not matter what they do if it is in the name of Jesus. So perhaps Rebecca has inside information, but it is her perspective, and since she has left, things may have been forgotten or twisted. Maybe not. I came here not to give battle. I thought that because born agains give you guys a hard time that perhaps I could have some thoughtful discussions here. I see that I was wrong. Not the first time. I feel bad that you have such a negative feelings towards my faith. I can see that as tempting as it is to take each point and discuss them, it would do me little good. You have already closed your minds to learn a different perspective. I would have loved to learn from you.
Remember what I said in an earlier post about the “persecution card”? You just played it.

As I said then, we have seen it before.

We have also seen mormon posters automatically discount anything an exmormon says, simply because they are ex. 🤷

We have also seen mormons avoid questions by simply ignoring them, or they stop posting, or they play word games instead of answering the question, and let’s not forget just bearing their testimony when they can’t answer the question.

So, I will ask you for the **3rd **time. Why the big time gap between the time JS started practicing polygamy, and the time it became a public “revelation”. How do you explain that it coincided with Emma catching him with Fanny?
 
I will answer this before I leave. No I am not going to teach this. Since learning about it from you and other sources that confirm what you were saying, then it would be lying to do so. . May God bless you all.
Fatboy,

We wish you would stay. I’m not sure what to believe about you. You stated
I know you think I am just a member who is following blindly, but I am not. I am probably the biggest LDS skeptic and have always done research to search out answers to my questions
All of your words above are admirable and we all assume them to be true. It’s your testimony. I will still assume them to be true.

To the point of this thread, the Catholic Church never practiced polygamy but you clearly thought it did based on some type of research or facts as you knew them. We assumed that you were going to respond to the sources that you used. But we never received the sources of your research.

My sense is that this discussion evolved into what I think are secondary disputes on JS’s wives…who said what about who (or is that about whom?). I would defer to RebeccaJ’s opinion but for me the two sincere questions that I have, if you are willing to answer are:
  • What evidence is there that there was a “Great Apostasy” in the Catholic Church?
  • Is there credible evidence that JS was a prophet from God?
If you have some sincere questions, I would love to answer them.
What I would also share is that every Catholic that has posted on LDS in some way, has a lot of respect and admiration for the LDS love of family and the missionary efforts of the youth. The LDS love of family has strong parallels in the Catholic Church and the world would be much better if Catholic’s had a similar missionary effort.

I hope you come back and I pray that you will. You say that you are a farmer…where I come from the farmers are tougher than the bulls.

Pork (me) N Pie (my sweet wife)

:highprayer:
 
Yes, I know this is what you believe. TPG responded as he did because you didn’t address what I said, at all. You just bore your testimony. Granted, it is important to you, but it holds no meaning for us. No more than our testimony of Jesus Christ and our surety in His Love and Mercy, including guiding His Church until “the end of the age”, means anything to you.

So, you think you prayed and God told you Jesus was a god among many gods? I find that impossible to believe. Why? Because it doesn’t align at all, to Who Jesus says He is. It is a god of your (or Smith’s) making.
Sorry I said I was leaving but I do have to respond to this. Why would you presume that I do not care whether or not you believe in Christ? That is again another false statement. I love the fact that you believe in Christ. That you have faith in his life and his purpose for his life on earth. It means something to me to know you have a testimony of him. So I would ask you not to teach something that you do not know. And it does not matter to me that you can not believe I received an answer to my questions about God, Jesus Christ or what I believe to be his kingdom here on earth. May I ask how you know that what you believe is more correct than what I believe?
 
Given that your previous posts in this thread have been used as covert opportunities to advocate same-sex marriage, and that the post in question was nothing more than “Wow 1134? It took a long time.” It’s readily apparent that you picked up fatboys fumble and ran with it. I may very well be wrong, and if I am I’ll graciously apologize, but I think your posting history coupled with the explicit words of your post demonstrate well that the way I read your post is exactly how you intended it to be read.
Someone asked me about marriage. But anyway apology accepted. I would have liked to have seen Fatboy’s source as well. Peace be with you.
 
Somehow I always end up getting referenced to in the third person. 😃

I was a Mormon a long time ago. I was taught in Mormon meetings what Mormons now call anti-Mormon. 🤷 I’m ok with it, as, I do have some fond memories and most of my family, who I love, are LDS.

There is truth going on here. It is what it is. I have no reason to make things up.

I also understand and accept that you believe what you believe. Better that you do than go the way of many Mormons, into atheism.

The alternative is, Christ’s Church never failed. I think that is more of an important consideration than anything Smith could have done. Mormons just seem to accept that Christ failed. I’ll never understand why.

Peace be with you.
Is this a persecution complex carried over from your mormon days?
 
May I ask how you know that what you believe is more correct than what I believe?
They’re going to respond with what is their faith. They have faith and belief that they know. Just as you do about Joseph Smith. They place faith in the Catholic Church’s interpretation of Herself and of Scripture. They place faith in the ECFs and in Catholic interpretaion of history. They don’t really know. They believe they do based on faith. But the truth is no one truly knows with 100% absolute certainty. The only way for anyone to know is to to think and believe they “know” based on their faith.

Then if history is any indication they’re going to say I’m a relativist. But that’s not relalivism. That’s just the simple truth. Some people might end up being more right or wrong about ultimate truth than others. That’s just a fact of faith. Because we walk by faith. Not by sight. Peace.
 
Fatboy,

We wish you would stay. I’m not sure what to believe about you. You stated

All of your words above are admirable and we all assume them to be true. It’s your testimony. I will still assume them to be true.

To the point of this thread, the Catholic Church never practiced polygamy but you clearly thought it did based on some type of research or facts as you knew them. We assumed that you were going to respond to the sources that you used. But we never received the sources of your research.

My sense is that this discussion evolved into what I think are secondary disputes on JS’s wives…who said what about who (or is that about whom?). I would defer to RebeccaJ’s opinion but for me the two sincere questions that I have, if you are willing to answer are:
  • What evidence is there that there was a “Great Apostasy” in the Catholic Church?
  • Is there credible evidence that JS was a prophet from God?
What I would also share is that every Catholic that has posted on LDS in some way, has a lot of respect and admiration for the LDS love of family and the missionary efforts of the youth. The LDS love of family has strong parallels in the Catholic Church and the world would be much better if Catholic’s had a similar missionary effort.

I hope you come back and I pray that you will. You say that you are a farmer…where I come from the farmers are tougher than the bulls.

Pork (me) N Pie (my sweet wife)

:highprayer:
I have been around long enough on boards to know that if my presence is going to cause problems, contention etc. I certainly do not want to cause that in a place that I do not own and I am a quest. I certainly do not want to disrespect anyone and I love to joke around as well. I am busy and do not spend a lot of time in discussions as I use to. It was like beating my head against the wall trying to explain what I believe to only have it spit on, an disrespected in the most vile and contentious manner. I came here by accident trying to learn about early christians beliefs on polygamy namely the Catholic church. I had read a couple of articles a few years ago that stated that even the catholic church practiced it at one time. This was from non LDS sources I might add. I just accepted it because of the circumstances it said it was lived under. When my relative left the LDS church because of their struggle with polygamy and joined the Catholic church I was trying to find the information about the catholic church and polygamy. I could not find anything about it and thought perhaps I had dreamed it up. I then found this site which was talking about it. It gave me more information on where to look and found that the articles I had read were to general and wrong in some of the facts. I had already told this person about polygamy and had to tell them that the information I had was wrong and corrected it.
 
I have been around long enough on boards to know that if my presence is going to cause problems, contention etc. I certainly do not want to cause that in a place that I do not own and I am a quest. I certainly do not want to disrespect anyone and I love to joke around as well. I am busy and do not spend a lot of time in discussions as I use to. It was like beating my head against the wall trying to explain what I believe to only have it spit on, an disrespected in the most vile and contentious manner. I came here by accident trying to learn about early christians beliefs on polygamy namely the Catholic church. I had read a couple of articles a few years ago that stated that even the catholic church practiced it at one time. This was from non LDS sources I might add. I just accepted it because of the circumstances it said it was lived under. When my relative left the LDS church because of their struggle with polygamy and joined the Catholic church I was trying to find the information about the catholic church and polygamy. I could not find anything about it and thought perhaps I had dreamed it up. I then found this site which was talking about it. It gave me more information on where to look and found that the articles I had read were to general and wrong in some of the facts. I had already told this person about polygamy and had to tell them that the information I had was wrong and corrected it.
You keep claiming that you are being abused. You are not. You keep being asked questions. You ignore them. You claim the Catholic Church used to permit polygamy. You say you have non-LDS sources. You should tell us what evidence you have.

If I said Mormons used to eat children you would expect me to back-up my claim with evidence. I can assure you that if I made such an outrageous claim I would certainly back it up.

To say that the Catholic Church used to permit polygamy goes beyond plain polemics. It is a serious accusation concerning something that is contrary to our faith. You should either withdraw the claim unreservedly or produce references to support it.
 
It was like beating my head against the wall trying to explain what I believe to only have it spit on, an disrespected in the most vile and contentious manner.
Like when you claim the Catholic Church practiced polygamy without any proof? You been asked to explain yourself many times but you would rather bear false witness and run.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top