W
whatistrue
Guest
New York spends at or near the top per student in the country. How are the public schools in NYC?That is your perception
New York spends at or near the top per student in the country. How are the public schools in NYC?That is your perception
A magnet program, not a magnet school, and in the same district. And quite racially diverse. But by all means, keep trying to make the narrative fit your conceptions.Oh, magnet schools.
Yes, that is the definition of a magnet school. It has special programs to draw white students into a minority school so the district looks better on their level of racial segregation in schools.Magnet schools are district schools, at least in my area. The one where I’m considering sending my kids offers an ELL program, hosting immigrant and refugee children, and is quite diverse.
You care enough to post here and join in the fun on Catholic arguing forum!Don’t know; don’t care. I am not a fan of ranking by standardized test scores. And where there was one HS then, there are at least five now, possibly more, in the county.
Your assumptions are showing. The school she went to was about twice as “white” as the school she would have gone to by attendance map.It has special programs to draw white students into a minority school so the district looks better on their level of racial segregation
I care enough about education and truth, not about scores on a test that don’t actually reflect education levels.You care enough
??? What programs “draw [in] white students?” Are white students interested in different programs than ethnic minorities?It has special programs to draw white students
This sounds rather cynical. It’s not a matter of “looking better” but “doing better.” Or is there something wrong with de-segregating?so the district looks better on their level of racial segregation in schools.
A variety of reasons. It’s really hard to fire dysfunctional teachers and principles, who are often just moved to other schools. Other times, peer groups can become toxic, and it’s a good thing to break them up. Other times, a school is in a neighborhood where a kid is safer. Finally, a lot of families don’t want to wait around for schools to “get better.” To paraphrase one reform activist, if a building is on fire, it’s urgent to get people out.My question is, if a school district can figure out how to create high-achieving magnet schools, why don’t they apply those same techniques and standards to all their underperforming schools?
. Another type of “magnet school” or “magnet program” emerged in the United States in the 1970s[1] as one means of remedying [racial segregation](Racial segregation - Wikipedia) in public schools, and they were written into law in Section 5301 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Authorization.[2] Demographic trends following the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education US Supreme Court decision revealed a pattern later characterized as white flight, the hypersegregation of blacks and whites, as the latter moved to the suburbs.[3][4] The first charter school, McCarver Elementary School, opened in Tacoma, Washington in 1968.[5] This second type of magnet can often take the form a of “a school within a school,” meaning that the school may have no competitive admissions for the majority of the school population, and even the magnet program itself may not have fully competitive admissions. This is consistent with the equity based objectives of such programs.
I don’t. I am done here as this is getting more and more off topic and I apologize to the OP and others for my part in hijacking the thread.I believe
I care enough about education and truth, not about scores on a test that don’t actually reflect education levels.You care enough
Furthermore, you have made a claim and now expect us to do the research to back up your claim. Typically, when this happens in forums, it does not end well for the person who made the initial claim.Just a minute and I will show you the studies that show that kids from low SES backgrounds that were given a voucher to attend a CAtholic school did slightly worse than staying in their public school.
They may, or they may not. The pass rate of a standardized test is worthless in determining how well educated the students as a group, or any given individual student, are.10 or 20 percent passing actually are educating
Are you saying that Christian parents are sacrificing their kid’s future by sending them to public school?I guess Christian parents should sacrifice their children’s futures on the altar of public education. That seems like a good idea!
Any parent might be sacrificing a child’s future when they send them to a low-quality public school, yes. That is my opinion. Especially in reference to the fact that @cloistered said that Catholic schools are not as Christian as public schools.Jen95:
Are you saying that Christian parents are sacrificing their kid’s future by sending them to public school?I guess Christian parents should sacrifice their children’s futures on the altar of public education. That seems like a good idea!