Yes to all of the above, except in this Archdiocese the Sacraments are never done in conjunction with the schools. Schools do not confect sacraments, parishes do. The Archbishop is FIRM on that. But the children in the schools have religion class every day, whereas at the parish level it’s once a week…In most of the parishes I’m familiar with, the problems are basically the same. The single biggest is a money problem. The parish does not get as much money in the collection as it used to, so tuition is not subsidized as much by the parish, so the Catholic students have to pay more. The school spends to much on “technology”, trying to keep up with public schools. Staff has always worked for less than their public counterparts but it’s harder to find those Catholics who will take less. And, as pianistclare pointed out, there are less nuns and brothers to help out.
Moving the sacraments out of school, as indicated in the article, won’t help attract Catholics. Why would the Catholics bother to spend their income on tuition when they aren’t getting a Catholic education?
A good solution would be for our property tax dollars to go to the school of our choice. And renters should be afforded the same with their landlord’s property taxes.
I can’t argue with you on this. What you say is true.Yes to all of the above, except in this Archdiocese the Sacraments are never done in conjunction with the schools. Schools do not confect sacraments, parishes do. The Archbishop is FIRM on that. But the children in the schools have religion class every day, whereas at the parish level it’s once a week…
People who pay a ridiculous amount in tuition fail to tithe because they feel like they are paying too much in the first place But the school money is strictly separated from the parish money.
It’s a mess. Catholic schools just can’t compete with tax dollars, and frankly they shouldn’t. But parents demand more and more…I remember one parent advancing that if they didn’t have religion class each day, they could have Phy Ed more often.
The parents don’t put their kids there for the faith, they put them there because it’s private school, they still wear uniforms, and they are scared of having their children interact with other races or faiths. Period. Sounds ugly? It is. I’ve had some families that were truly devout and wonderful, big helpers, fine people. But there are plenty of snobs to go around. Too bad they have plenty of $$$$ because money talks.
My parish’s school helps that by charging non-Catholics more for tuition.Yeah sadly that’s been the case for many years, Catholic schools not only not attracting Catholics but attracting non-Catholics or maybe even non-Christians.
I’d suggest that is a fairly parochial assessment (perhaps common throughout the US), but not a universal appraisal.While I’m not a fan of Catholic bashing, there are several reasons why the Catholic Schools are in the state they are in:
I could go on for pages, that’s a snapshot of what goes on.
- decline (due to not appreciating) of the religious that worked for pennies in the schools
- Catholic Diocese’ feeling like their schools have to compete with the private schools
- Loss of the parish school model. Regional school will take anyone with a check that doesn’t bounce
- Pricing that excludes most practicing Catholic families. When Elementary school runs $8,000 per year when parents should be saving that $$ for college? No bueno.
- Not treating their employees well or paying competitively
- not enforcing the policy of enrolling Catholics first.
- Not hiring Catholic teachers and principals.
- No longer having the support of parishes and their pastors due to the Regional school model.
I can understand a particular Catholic school might be unable to well support a student with a particular difficulty, but screening out a child attending the local parish church etc on academic performance grounds (assuming it’s not itself a selective school) is reprehensible.I remember the principal of a local catholic elementary school that said catholic families have a “duty“ to support the schools by sending their children to catholic schools. When asked why they had entrance exams or how they supported catholic children with special needs he said they had to maintain a high academic rigor and so had to be selective in who they enrolled. When asked point blank how one was supposed to fulfill their "duty“ when the schools rejected them he said we should still financially contribute for the benefit of those who it’s a good fit. My left foot that I’ll be fulfilling that “duty“.