Catholic teaching not found in the Bible

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lilyflower
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi

Kindly mention who authored it.

Thanks
  • The 4 gospels were written by their attributing author none of which include St. Paul.
  • The Acts of the Apostles was likely written by the same author as the Gospel According to St. Luke (See Above).
  • The Catholic Letters (Heb, Jas, I&II Pet, I,II,&III Jn, Jd) have different authors (most of which are by the first Pope St. Peter and the Apostle St. John).
  • The Apocalypse (Revelation) is written by either the Apostle John or John of Patmos.
 
Catholics often hear critics arguing that ‘the Catholic Church teaches things not found in the bible’, whereas Bible-alone groups reject these doctrines.
(John 20,30)
And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book:


We can’t rely only in a single book

He taught many things in private
 
  • The 4 gospels were written by their attributing author none of which include St. Paul…
Hi

NTBible is neither authored by GodAllahYHWH nor by JesusYeshuaIssa or authenticated by him.
In fact the four gospels are written by the anonymous authors;
simply go to the Catholic Encyclopedia here:
newadvent.org/cathen/index.html
enter ‘gospel’, hit search and see what it says below
“It thus appears that the present titles of the Gospels are not traceable to the Evangelists themselves”.
newadvent.org/cathen/06655b.htm

Thanks
 
(John 20,30)
And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book:


We can’t rely only in a single book

He taught many things in private
And what does that mean? Don’t you think that they would have included them in their writings if they thought they were drastic and life-changing? Besides, it says He “did”, not “said”.

And if you use that arguement, does that not mean that we could all just make stuff up and say Jesus could have said this or done that?
 
The Trinity is Biblical. It is proven in several verses. The Trinity is also Anglican doctrine.
Catholics think it’s in the Bible. You think it’s in the Bible. The Orthodox think it’s in the Bible. The Anglicans think it’s in the Bible. Mainstream Protestants think it’s in the Bible. But it is not – at least in the sense that it is unequivocally articulated beyond all dispute.

Plenty of people (Arians, Nestorians, Gnostics) at the time of the definition of the doctrine in the fourth century had no concept of the Trinity as the Church understood/understands it, and rejected it heartily. In fact, the definition of the Holy Trinity, as understood by the universal Church, required the controversial introduction of an entirely non-Biblical word: homoousion.

Nope: Trinity is not in the Bible. It is consistent with Scripture but it is not defined in Scripture. For that, you need the Church, to which the Catholics, Orthodox, Anglicans and mainstream Protestants (who know the history of the faith) all attest and in which they all concur.
 
Hi

Yes, there is not a single Muslim who does not belive that Jesus did receive Word of Revelation from GodAllahYHWH. It is another thing that it could not be preserved by his people.

But there is nothing to woryy; GodAllahYHWH revealed Jesus’ and Mary’s essential life accounts on Muhammad as mentioned in Quran. At least there is something authentic with us; a good gesture of peace on the part of Islam/Quran/Muhammad.

Let us work for the peace of the world so vital for humanity.

Thanks
How do you determine that a revelation is divine?
 
Which is to say, the Catholic Church. There were

no Anglicans prior to 1534. The Early Church and the Catholic Church are one and the same thing. 😉
Why isn’t 'Catholic mentioned in Acts?
It does; “Katolikos” means “Catholic.” 🙂
Originally Posted by xixxvmcm85
I would argue that it is implied even “loosely”, otherwise the only alternative is that the Bible contradicts itself.
True there are no verses that explicitly say “The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are three persons united in one substance, one God”, however there ARE verses that explicitly say that Jesus is God, that the Holy Spirit is God, and there are also verses that claim there is but one God.
The Trinity is the obvious, logical interpolation of the cumulative effect of all these verses.
Jimcrae posted:
You can also arrive at the Papacy and the Immaculate Conception in a similar way, but first you have to know which verses to look at - this, we get from the Oral Tradition.
Mercygate posted:
Catholics think it’s in the Bible. You think it’s in the Bible. The Orthodox think it’s in the Bible. The Anglicans think it’s in the Bible. Mainstream Protestants think it’s in the Bible. But it is not – at least in the sense that it is unequivocally articulated beyond all dispute.
Plenty of people (Arians, Nestorians, Gnostics) at the time of the definition of the doctrine in the fourth century had no concept of the Trinity as the Church understood/understands it, and rejected it heartily. In fact, the definition of the Holy Trinity, as understood by the universal Church, required the controversial introduction of an entirely non-Biblical word: homoousion.
Nope: Trinity is not in the Bible. It is consistent with Scripture but it is not defined in Scripture. For that, you need the Church, to which the Catholics, Orthodox, Anglicans and mainstream Protestants (who know the history of the faith) all attest and in which they all concur.
👍
 
The teaching is that of the Blessed Trinity: Father Son and Holy Spirit. Anyone here who do not agree with this great Catholic doctrine?
All biblical Truth originates from God and He clearly teaches us in His written word the Truth of the trinity.
There is however one particular doctrine the Church teaches that is not mentioned in the bible, not even loosely.
The Lord Jesus said the following words;

But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom **the Father **will send in My name, He will teach you all things, John 14:26

.
 
All biblical Truth originates from God and He clearly teaches us in His written word the Truth of the trinity.

The Lord Jesus said the following words;

But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom **the Father **will send in My name, He will teach you all things, John 14:26

.
Where in that passage does it state that the Father, the Holy Spirit, and Jesus are each distinct Persons who are members of one God?
 
All biblical Truth originates from God and He clearly teaches us in His written word the Truth of the trinity.
The Lord Jesus said the following words;

But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom **the Father **will send in My name, He will teach you all things, John 14:26
But Scrpture also says: There is much else that Jesus did that are not recorded in this book Jn Jn21:25. These things were passed on by oral transmission and are now part of sacred tradition as valid as the written word 🙂
 
All biblical Truth originates from God and He clearly teaches us in His written word the Truth of the trinity.

The Lord Jesus said the following words;

But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom **the Father **will send in My name, He will teach you all things, John 14:26

.
Em, you are reading into those words something which the words, taken in themselves, cannot support. The Mormons, reading those same words, see the Holy Spirit only as a “messenger” spirit not of the same substance as the Father. It cannot be demonstrated from Scripture alone that the Holy Spirit is a divine Person.
 
Em, you are reading into those words something which the words, taken in themselves, cannot support. The Mormons, reading those same words, see the Holy Spirit only as a “messenger” spirit not of the same substance as the Father. It cannot be demonstrated from Scripture alone that the Holy Spirit is a divine Person.
Imo you are scraping the bottom of the barrel when you use the argument of what the “Mormons” believe to disprove the Truth of the trinity in John 14:26.

.
 
Does God have to state the obvious?

.
God states the obvious through the Catholic Church. Those who don’t believe the Catholic Church end up believing like the Mormons, etc. It is only a short step from denying the authority of the Councils of the Church, to denying their actual findings, too.
 
Where in that passage does it state that the Father, the Holy Spirit, and Jesus are each distinct Persons who are members of one God?
Good question. Kind of like where does the Bible specifically say that Purgatory exists?
 
Does God have to state the obvious?

.
Em, this is the whole point. A Trinitarian sees the “obvious” in Scripture because we “know” the Holy Spirit is a divine Person: co-equal, consubstantial, and co-eternal with the Father and the Son. But from Scripture ALONE, apart from the faith of the Church, as defined in the great fourth Century Councils, it is not obvious that the Holy Spirit is a divine Person. Those very terms derive from the conciliar definitions.

The verse you quote from John 14 does not support the weight you give it. The very translation you quoted simply uses the word “helper” for the Spirit. There is no inevitable attribution of divine Personhood.
 
Good question. Kind of like where does the Bible specifically say that Purgatory exists?
Point taken. And that IS the very point about the Trinity.

Purgatory IS in Scripture, and the evidence is abundant. But like the doctrine of the Holy Trinity, it requires reading Scripture from the heart of the Church that wrote the New Testament. You see the Trinity or Purgatory only when (as St. Paul advises) the eyes of your heart are opened.

Protestants tend to see Catholics as mindlessly accepting things “because your Church tells you they are true.” Catholics tend to see Protestants as refusing to see things simply “because the Catholic Church believes them to be true” rather than because they are not true.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top