Catholicism verses Islam differences and similarities

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ted_in_Charlott
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry, but ‘quite a few’ is a pathetic answer to all the violence in the koran.

And the name calling again. While muslims in the Sudan are slaughtering Christians - no muslim nation, cleric, imam, ayatollah - stops their own. While the muslims in Lebanon are rearming - - no muslim nation, cleric, imam, ayatollah - stops their own, but instead pay for those bombs.

Here is an article on the hezbollah has tripled its bombs since 2006.

jihadwatch.org/archives/021721.php

The jihadists in Somalia are now pirating the waters, besides killing non-muslims - no muslim nations stops them.

In fact, the largest export of saudi arabia, Pakistan, etc are jihadists. Not oil.

No muslim nation is helping Afghanistan stop the Taliban reappearing in their country after pakistan helped to rebuild their numbers.

No one stopping the kidnapping of Hindu children for muslim males to marry, or enslave. In fact, no muslim nations helps to stop islamic slavery that goes on.

Sorry, but the list goes on - use your bet money to give to the poor. The souls being lost to islam in those countries probably need a meal more than I do.
You constantly try to slip out of your claims when I call you on them.

"Muslims are active in da’wa - and that is what we see on these threads. They do nothing to correct their own and instead spread a lot of twisting, illogic, etc of what islam is all about. "

You made that statement. I made an offer to provide ten counterexamples. Do you accept my bet or not?

Either admit you exaggerated, or accept my bet.
 
“They have wiped out so many others that I cannot remember all those of different pagan religions. Not just convert - I mean they murdered them.”

Again, when you make claims, you should back them up. Dont just make silly, unsubstantial claims. Am sure (and hope 🙂 that most of the audience here are intelligent enough to recognize a baseless claim when they see one. Among the most widely believed myths in the west today about Islam is myth of forcible conversion to Islam. It is widely believed due to the fact that Islam spread very rapidly. I will not go now into how or why Islam spread very rapidly, but I will address your unfounded claim of the forced conversion myth.
If your claim were true, can you explain to me why there is (until today) in almost every muslim country several minorities of several religions (in the millions actually). If Muslims had forced every one they conquered to convert, there would be none. Another interesting fact for you. Muslims ruled India for about 1000 years. More than 80% of the population of India is non-muslim. All these non-muslim indians are witnesses today that Islam does not force any one to convert to Islam.

" Because with muslims lobbing bombs into Israel on a daily basis and too often aiming at children’s schools - that couldn’t be what you are claiming is it?! That it is ok for muslims to do that?!"
It appears that you are very ignorant about the above subject. According to INTERNATIONAL LAW, ie, UNITED NATIONS (I personally do not support or recognize UN, but reference it here on the assumption that you do), Israel occupation of Palestinian land is ILLEGAL, building of Israeli settlements on Palestinian land is ILLEGAL and there has been alot of UN mandates and resolutions ordering Israel to a) pull out of palestinian land, and b) to stop building settlements on Palestinian land, yet they continue to do so. And lat time I checked, for every 1 Israeli civilian that dies, 6 Palestinians civilians die (check the death stats on both sides yourself if you dont believe me). And dont even get me started on Israel war with Lebanon, where more than 1000 civilians where killed.

"The above article on hezbollah stockpiling and tripled its weapon count since 2006. "
So what??? Every country in the world has and is stock piling weapons.

"And the palestinians have not only gotten better bombs - but more of them too. There are articles to back that up too. "
So what ??? Palestinians are fighting the most just war on earth (and Iraq too). They are fighting against a foreign country invading their land. Since when has that become illegal ?? am sure if another country invaded your country, you would consider it your right to fight for your land, so why deny other people the same right?
For muslims wiping out others besides the Zorastrians - here goes:
jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/015497.php

We all know the stated threats coming from hezbollah, hamas, and the palestinians to wipe out the Israelis. We also know the plight of the Coptic Christians and their dwindling numbers. Most are forced to convert to islam because their life is so miserable under sharia law.

Of course you won’t go into ‘how or why’ islam spread so quickly - it was spread by the sword. duh.

As for the death and destruction of a civilization that was in India before the muslim conquests - this website goes into it a bit, and there are books on it - the Legacy of Jihad for one. There were three waves of jihad that went through India and a current jihad was issued late last year (2007).

jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/007743.php

the only myths that I am seeing are the myths of denial of what islam is all about. All one has to do is study history to find out.

A good book that has a whole section on the fact that muslims deny their own history and the intolerance of islam on its conquered ones (the ones that are not outright killed by muslims). The Myth of islamic Tolerance, by Robert Spencer.

Legacy of Jihad - it goes into the fate of non-muslims.

One thing for certain, and I have stated it time and again, proof is not only available to back up my words - but it grows daily.
 
What is the transgression? Persecution of innocent people. Attacking or invading another land. Attempting to wipe out a particular population or force them to convert. These are examples of transgressions.

The cause of Allah, or the way of Allah, interesting question you asked. I’m not sure how to answer it, since I’m not sure of your mental frame.
Islam has been guilty of all those things since Muhammad founded it! That is Islam’s way.

Is it justice for Muslims to drive Greenlanders from their homes by attacking and harassing them as this reports?

Vickie
 
To all ppl out there. I see alot of ppl quoting articles from the web or some book about Muslims did this and Muslim killed that.
Now in an argument, wat u r doing is not valid. If you want to say something about Islam, you basically have only two sources that you should be quoting. They are:
  1. The Qura’n
  2. The Hadiths
    That is ALL of Islam and all of its commandments and rules. We Muslims follow the above two and ONLY the above two.
    To go and quote an article is absurd, there are millions (if not billions) of articles out there and I bet you every single one will say somethin different. I can come up with a hundred articles right now that will say all christians are murderers cheaters bla bla bla (am not saying any of those things, just trying to get a point across).
    So please, if you have a prob with Qura’n or Hadith, then by all means, I will b happy to elaborate on that, otherwise, it just gets pointless.
    I thnk wat am saying above is fair. No?
 
Loaded Palestinian question? I really wasn’t thinking about that at all. It’s just a hypothetical question. What would Jesus do if he were a judge?

Would he command some kind of retribution to fulfill the right of the person from whom it was stolen?

Or would he say, that was bad what he did but… I forgive him.

?
Jesus’ kingdom is not from this world. He is the judge of mankind, and He is gonna return to judge the living and the dead at the end of times.
 
  1. The Qura’n
  2. The Hadiths
    That is ALL of Islam and all of its commandments and rules. We Muslims follow the above two and ONLY the above two.
    I thnk wat am saying above is fair. No?
yes, very fair…but the problem does not stop here because both the Quran and hadith do not present the standards we are taught by Jesus…paying jizya with humiliation will always be humiliation, these are the words of the Quran and nothing will turn them into a blessing or a peaceful approach…we are infidels who will rot in hell will never turn to be “brotherhood love”…killing infidels, apostates ecc are in the hadith…who is an infidel, when to kill, who to kill, are up to Islamic standards and there is no authority in Islam…
 
Before answering such a loaded Palestianan question…stealing is wrong. He would be against it.
The muslims stole land from Jews and Christians for 1400 years - what about that land? I know the muslims will ignore this.

But, the Israelis did not steal the land. the Pals did not own the land - the Arabs did. And they let the Pals on it and basically sold the land to the Jews from under them.

NOw, you will think that the Jews were bad and kicked the out - they did not. The pals didn’t leave israel on a whole until just before the 6 Day War when the Arabs told them to leave and that they would take care of them - the Arabs didn’t do anything for them except to use them as cannon fodder.

Not all the pals left Israel that is why there are some there that won’t leave - they know it is better in Israel than the sty that the muslims have, and are, making for themselves. No matter how much money we throw at them - they are not fixing anything but only buying more bombs.

So, this supposed evil of the Israelis by muslims - this hatred - is just an excuse. Their koran is the source of this hatred and Israel is just another excuse to hate.
 
What exactly are your views on slavery in the Bible?
I don’t think it is evil in nature, but it is human nature and things were pretty basic 3000 years ago. Being or having a slave in the OT I think falls in two categories; the willing slave and the unwilling slave. The treatment of a slave also falls into two categories; fair or unfair. Moses was a willing slave who sold 14 years of his service for 2 wives. Joseph was a unwilling slave in Egypt sold by his brothers.
Was it justified?
If we are capable/willing to kill each other as Cain demonstrates anything else is just a shade of the same sin God warned Our Parents about. Willing or unwilling, God I think wants us to be fair. We are making our own choices.
genocide is justified to prevent the pagans from corrupting the Jews?
God was/is serious. I think He was putting the Jews through a purification process for a reason.

I would also try and put some context - not excuse-to it with the first being many of the local people were driven off the land and not killed. Genocide might not apply. I don’t know. Secondly the size of these communites were not very large by todays standard, and last at times God said kill/destroy everything (no slaves, no animals, no treasure) because He wanted the Jews to know this was a serious and unique thing, limited, and that it would be God that provides them the land, not taken as spoils of war.
look at page 556 (of the actual book text).
I understand that it can be annoying reading computer text. However I can’t type out my hard copy of the book.
They really go to great lengths to make reality obscure. Whatever the ‘true’ intent the example of Mohammed in hadith is valid to the vast majority of Muslims but I don’t think the ‘true’ intent of Mohammed was as described there but as practiced for centuries.
Fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but begin not hostilities. Lo! Allah loveth not aggressors. (190) And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution is worse than slaughter. And fight not with them at the Inviolable Place of Worship until they first attack you there, but if they attack you (there) then slay them. Such is the reward of disbelievers. (191) But if they desist, then lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. (192) And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah. But if they desist, then let there be no hostility except against wrong-doers. (193) The forbidden month for the forbidden month, and forbidden things in retaliation. And one who attacketh you, attack him in like manner as he attacked you. Observe your duty to Allah, and know that Allah is with those who ward off (evil). (194) Spend your wealth for the cause of Allah, and be not cast by your own hands to ruin; and do good. Lo! Allah loveth the beneficent.
I don’t see anything here to suggest that Charity is only for Muslims
Who is them and would you (if Muslim) give them charity? Mohammed was not the type to give a man he intended on killing safe passage or comfort.
I have always heard that Mecca had abandoned the traditional principals of egalitarianism when Muhammad arose. That may be a fabrication of Islamic History. But I have never heard Mecca described as a egalitarian paradise.
I’m curious why you said it was a positive aspect of Islam then?
start on page 227. 229 goes to the heart of your question.
How widespread that idea is within Islam I don’t know but I don’t agree with the conclusion the author draws in that ‘Hell is the sinners friend or mother’. The problem is Muslims still want to help the unbeliever get purified in hell ASAP.
They still use the Qur’an as the basis of their faith. Because the Koran speaks in the name of the God of Abraham I reject every single word of it since I have concluded it is not and Mohammed is not a prophet. It doesn’t make a lot of sense to reason with what is rejected not just on faith, but the historical record is about as right as the BOM so its rejected on data as well.
Well. When you talk about Islam and criticize it, do you stick to the strict teachings of Islam? It seems that you often cite the examples of Muslims to accuse Islam. If that is the case then it is fair to look at the actions Christians as well.
I try very hard to stick to the teachings of Islam. I don’t know why I would look to a Moromon to accuse Islam, but if they used the Quran as justification to commit terrorism I would. It is fair to look at the actions of the Christians in the context of Scripture. Eric Rudolph did his bit in the name of Jesus supposedly pretty much like UBL did his in the name of allah and his prophet. The scripture of Jesus refutes Rudolph’s actions, but Mohameds scripture supports UBL.
 
yes, very fair…but the problem does not stop here because both the Quran and hadith do not present the standards we are taught by Jesus…paying jizya with humiliation will always be humiliation, these are the words of the Quran and nothing will turn them into a blessing or a peaceful approach…we are infidels who will rot in hell will never turn to be “brotherhood love”…killing infidels, apostates ecc are in the hadith…who is an infidel, when to kill, who to kill, are up to Islamic standards and there is no authority in Islam…
inJesus this is not right. If you are a believing and practicing christian, you will not be harmed. paying Jizyah is no problem. It is for your security and safety and for the safety of few muslims living in the christian controlled lands. So that they are not harmed.

If you are a believing Jew or a christian, you belong to the people of the book with special privilieges. You are not a Kafir or infidel unless you take upon yourself teh title of an enemy of Islam (Peace). Then you will be like the Muslims of today who are taking up arms against established governments. If you act in a bad manner or be abusive or take up arms against the Muslims state, then you will be punished.

Simple thing is: You are not a Kafir, You are not an infidel, as per the teaching of the Quran. Beileve it or leave it. You cannot show from the Quran that any innocent man may be punished or killed. So please stop accusing Islam. Thanks.
 
inJesus this is not right. If you are a believing and practicing christian, you will not be harmed. paying Jizyah is no problem. It is for your security and safety and for the safety of few muslims living in the christian controlled lands. So that they are not harmed.

If you are a believing Jew or a christian, you belong to the people of the book with special privilieges. You are not a Kafir or infidel unless you take upon yourself teh title of an enemy of Islam (Peace). Then you will be like the Muslims of today who are taking up arms against established governments. If you act in a bad manner or be abusive or take up arms against the Muslims state, then you will be punished.

Simple thing is: You are not a Kafir, You are not an infidel, as per the teaching of the Quran. Beileve it or leave it. You cannot show from the Quran that any innocent man may be punished or killed. So please stop accusing Islam. Thanks.
I believe you Planten. The problem is some other muslims don’t. And they also claim to act of behalf of Allah, claim their actions are legal as per Quran basis. That is a problem of leaderless situation, and what comes worse, your Quran as interpreted as it is, give ways to do so.
 
inJesus this is not right. If you are a believing and practicing christian, you will not be harmed. paying Jizyah is no problem. It is for your security and safety and for the safety of few muslims living in the christian controlled lands. So that they are not harmed.
You are repeating your already rebutted arguments and becoming no different than a broken record. The Koran teaches that for Allah there is ONE true religion, which is neither Christianity nor Judaism, but Islam! According to your scripture, Allah promised that his true religion would prevail against all the other religions on earth. According to the same book of yours, Muslims are commanded to fight ALL non-Muslims no matter how peaceful and kind Jews and Christians might be among them. The Koran never makes a distinction when it asks Muslims to fight and humiliate those that do not turn to Islam.

Paying jizya for the safety and security is a very ridiculous concept indeed! I would rather fight Muslims for my own safety and security BEFORE they invade my land. Christians must protect themselves from Muslims instead of paying Muslims for the supposed protection. I do not need to pay or do anything to let Muslims protect me, for I actually need protection AGAINST Muslims, not BY Muslims.😉
If you are a believing Jew or a christian, you belong to the people of the book with special privilieges. You are not a Kafir or infidel unless you take upon yourself teh title of an enemy of Islam (Peace). Then you will be like the Muslims of today who are taking up arms against established governments. If you act in a bad manner or be abusive or take up arms against the Muslims state, then you will be punished.
According to your book, even a Jewish or Christian saint is considered an infidel as long as he/she does not believe in Mohammad and Koran.

Why should I not fight a Muslim state that invades my land and takes a vow to humiliate me because of my faith??? Most of the Islamic states today are the direct result of the earliest invasion of non-Muslim countries by Muslims.

Why should I not fight Islamic ideology and its tenets, which openly contradict my faith and try to replace my scripture with a fabricated book attributed directly to Allah?
 
Thanks for asking. There will be no Jizyah money now because there will be no religious war (Jihad) now. That situation will never arise now. But if it does then the rule may apply. I have assured you about that. Believe it. It was necessary in the early days of Islam when every big power was ready to annihilate Islam. There were wars on different fronts. So there were laws which may never be needed again. Rest assured.

Another thing. If ever any Muslim country will enforce the laws of Shariah (which is not likely), even then that country will not be able to exact any Jizyah money from any christians or Jews. So no worry at all about any supposed thing please.
 
To all ppl out there. I see alot of ppl quoting articles from the web or some book about Muslims did this and Muslim killed that.
Now in an argument, wat u r doing is not valid. If you want to say something about Islam, you basically have only two sources that you should be quoting. They are:
  1. The Qura’n
  2. The Hadiths
    That is ALL of Islam and all of its commandments and rules. We Muslims follow the above two and ONLY the above two.
    To go and quote an article is absurd, there are millions (if not billions) of articles out there and I bet you every single one will say somethin different. I can come up with a hundred articles right now that will say all christians are murderers cheaters bla bla bla (am not saying any of those things, just trying to get a point across).
    So please, if you have a prob with Qura’n or Hadith, then by all means, I will b happy to elaborate on that, otherwise, it just gets pointless.
    I thnk wat am saying above is fair. No?
from hadith of Sahih Bukhari:

Volume 9, Book 85, Number 77:
Code:
While we were in the mosque, Allah's Apostle came out to us and said, "Let us proceed to the Jews." So we went along with him till we reached Bait-al-Midras (a place where the Torah used to be recited and all the Jews of the town used to gather). **The Prophet stood up and addressed them, "O Assembly of Jews! Embrace Islam and you will be safe!**" The Jews replied, "O Aba-l-Qasim! You have conveyed Allah's message to us." The Prophet said, "That is what I want (from you)." He repeated his first statement for the second time, and they said, "You have conveyed Allah's message, O Aba-l-Qasim." Then he said it for the third time and added, "You should Know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle, and I want to exile you fro,,, this land, so whoever among you owns some property, can sell it, **otherwise you should know that the Earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle."** (See Hadith No. 392, Vol. 4)
wake up, you are being duped! yes, there are beautiful parts from the quran, but what i am learning from koran and hadith is that islam is a complete and total system. a system that says (from quran) that you should not ask questions. a system that treats all others that do not believe as inferior and should NOT be given the same rights. a system that says to stone to death and adulterous couple (if married), a system that says to beat someone if they are drunk or caught gambling. AND
**
a system that says if you want out of this system you are to be killed**

Volume 9, Book 84, Number 64:
Code:
Narrated 'Ali:

Whenever I tell you a narration from Allah's Apostle, by Allah, I would rather fall down from the sky than ascribe a false statement to him, but if I tell you something between me and you (not a Hadith) then it was indeed a trick (i.e., I may say things just to cheat my enemy). No doubt I heard Allah's Apostle saying, "During the last days there will appear some young foolish people who will say the best words but their faith will not go beyond their throats (i.e. they will have no faith) and will go out from (leave) their religion as an arrow goes out of the game. **So, where-ever you find them, kill them, for who-ever kills them shall have reward on the Day of Resurrection."**
we should all love muslims and befriend them. i LOVE to be friends with folks of all kinds (mainly so i can hear varied music and eat tasty new foods! 🙂 ) but then i read this from quran:

[5.51] O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.

come on. how can you PC sugar coat that?

we can LOVE muslims and still hate a system that rules based on fear.

(contd)
 
and as far as the whole OT thing goes, well i am too rough around the edges to reply, but a friend put it this way:

"With respect to the question about ‘changing moral codes’ between the Old Testament and New testaments, the first thing we need to keep in mind is that the same God who revealed the Old is the God who became flesh and revealed his New commands to us in the Gospel. God didn’t change. But humanity does: the small tribe of Israel in 1000BC had grown alot by the time Jesus began preaching in 30AD.

The Old Testament forbade adultery on penalty of death but did not touch the inner life of the soul - it was a command against outside actions when outside actions were immediately vital to the continued life of the small community of believers.

In the New Testament Jesus warns us about interior infidelity - a much higher standard than the old, but then the society of believers was much larger and settled then.

But at the same time, the penalty for sin has been changed from public execution to mercy: it’s the paradox of the spirit that a higher moral code on the one hand must come with a higher tolerance for failure. Rather than an eye for an eye, it’s turn the other cheek.

Now it’s a little rich (or ironic) for a Muslim to claim that we’re being inconsistent here when their own ‘theology’ (such as it is) regards Allah to be completely “other” beyond human reasoning and logic, so that whatever God commands is good regardless of the logic or rationality involved. But what we have in the Bible is not inconsistency but God showing mercy - as is his prerogative - without changing morality.

Adultery is STILL against his will, but the penalty for doing it is no longer to kill the sinner as much as to CONVERT THEM via mercy and the outpouring of the Spirit.

In the Old Testament, the goal of the punitive morality was the preservation of the small tribe of Israel from immorality; the times and situation called for punitive measures: “there’s a time for war and a time for peace” - in the fullness of time when Jesus came, the People of God were sufficiently numerous and widespread and virtuous, that discrete immorality was not a mortal threat to the People’s continued existence. In that sense, the body politic was large enough to make patience and mercy possible.

At times since then, say, in the Dark ages after the fall of the Roman Empire, civilization in the West was so poor and unstable that prisons didn’t exist. People lived in small towns of a few dozen families or cities of a few hundred families. Most people knew one another and blood connections took the place of rule of law.

You had jails and dungeons - and that’s it. No institutions to house dangerous criminals.

Townsfolk didn’t have the wherewithall to take care of dangerous people and couldn’t afford to just let them go because the risk was too high that they’d return to a life of crime. So capital punishment was deemed essential to preserve the common good for certain crimes.

But once society prospered and grew large enough, it became more and more do-able to house criminals indefinitely in prisons. The cost of doing so was no longer a huge drain on the public treasury and safety to society was restored without needing to kill the evil-doer.

As situations change, good and evil don’t change, but punishment for evil can give way to mercy.

The principle governing both is self-defense. One must always do good and avoid evil, but there are times when unjust aggressors or sinners threaten the good of the family or tribe or nation. Ideally the evil doer ought to be constrained from evil, by reason first, and only as a last resort, by force. But in a nomadic tribal society like ancient Israel, allowing people to break their marriage bonds out of lust completely threatens the glue that held society together.

Everything rested on family unity and extended family bonds of kinship. Take that away by promiscuity and adultery and society is IMMEDIATELY threatened with civil-war and dissolution.

So capital punishment in that situation is self-defense.

By the time of Jesus and the Roman era, society was no longer nomadic, it was governned by laws not tribal blood connections, and so capital punishment for sin was no longer a demand of self-preservation. People were healthy enough to be merciful so mercy was the higher calling - just as interior chastity was the higher calling and so commanded by Jesus.

The goal of the Old Testament commands was holiness of the People of God. The goal has not changed in the New - God continues to call us to holiness but the level or depth of holiness is higher… the holier we all become, the stronger society becomes, and the more do-able mercy is. Peace is the result of virtue/self-control.

This conversely is why abortion is the greatest threat to world peace: if it’s OK to kill the completely innocent, completely defenseless among us out of convenience (pregnancy and babies being inconvenient to the modern atheistic materialistic hedonist) then war of the strong against the weak has already broken out…

More saints = more peace, forgiveness, gentleness, PROGRESS… no other way leads to peace but holiness of life.

Those who think we’ll have peace by banning guns but promoting hedonism among the youth are deluding themselves…adultery (destroying marriage) and promiscuity (destroying purity and holiness) undermines the very fabric of social harmony and will inevitably lead to violence, crime, and war. It’s not the guns that matter but the people who would use them… So banning guns in schools but teaching children to give in to their lusts is a far quicker way to promote violence and social decay than the alternative 1950’s situation where social morality was promoted in school and guns/knives weren’t even regulated.

So the Muslim who looks at the Old Testament and sees capital punishment meted out for lots of crimes that in the New Testament are simple forgiven is not looking at an inconsistent God or inconsistent religion, but a God who commands what is good for his people and a religion that sees the goal of punishment as being both the good of the individual and society; inasmuch as society has grown and God’s grace has borne fruit in social improvements, the punishment of Law gives way to the healing of Divine Mercy.

Therefore he is looking at God improving his people and their situation becoming more gentle over the centuries… God’s not changing, we are!

To then arrive at the Gospel and later Christian era where people are not killed for sin but at most jailed and converted by reason as opposed to terror and force is to see a Divine pedagogy, like a loving Father first spanking and then gently chiding a wayward son. Same Daddy, same child, but different situation, and different penalty.

To throw that all away and just accept the Koran and Koranic morality as God’s last will for humanity is to go in reverse, backwards towards punishment for punishment’s sake. God no longer a loving Father but a stern judge who demands submission for the sake of submission (“Is’lam”) on pain of death.

People tend to imitate whatever it is they worship, so if your god is a stern judge who demands unquestioned obedience on pain of death, the leaders of that religion will tend to become what they worship.

If on the other hand what we worship is a loving Father who so loved humanity that He sent his only Son to die as penalty for all our sins so that we may all live in his Spirit…our leaders will inturn become loving fathers who desire conversion of sinners, not their death.

All people have an innate religious sense - sort of the goosebumps on the neck sort of thing - that tell us when we’re in the presence of God.

Seeing a miracle does this to us. Meeting holy people does this to us and learning some doctrine that “just makes sense” also does this to us".

(contd)
 
…"We don’t believe the Bible is inspired because the bible says “this is inspired” and we don’t believe Jesus is God because Jesus said “I am God” or just because his followers said so.** Because anyone can claim to be inspired and any book can make any claim about itself.**

No, we believe because “of the works”:
  1. the miracles of the Old Testament and the New.
The Jews then (and now!) were NOT gullible people. They had to be taken kicking and screaming into the Promised Land. And only after enormous miracles done in their presence in the Exodus… In the New Testament, the apostles continue this tradition of skepticism even in the face of Jesus’ miracles…even doubting his Resurrection until he meets them on the road to Emmaus!
  1. the evident holiness of Moses, the Judges and Prophets’ lives, as well as the holiness of Jesus and his apostles’ lives: They practiced what they preached. They lived lives of self-lessness, prayer, charity, kindness… taking the hard road when the world, the flesh, and the devil offered an easier path…
  2. the internal logic/consistency of the Old and New testaments that don’t show God being arbitrary or illogical. It’s hard to read the 10 commandments and see irrationality. It’s also hard to read Jesus commands in Matthew’s Gospel that complete the 10 commandments on a higher level and see irrationality.
Miracles, holiness and reason are reasons to believe these books are indeed inspired by God.

With respect to Islam they have a prophet, Mohammed claimed to be inspired but he did no miracles. He was not particularly holy (he didn’t practice mercy, purity, or gentleness)

and his recorded words are not particularly logical.

The Koran, written from scraps of his sayings 200-300 years after he died makes lots of claims but again is not - in the light of the Jewish and Christian scripture - an “advance”.

What miracles? What holiness of life? What reasonableness? Where is the mercy? How is this doctrine conducive to progress?

In our doctrine, Muslims are people who need to be evangelized and converted - with reason, not bombs. If they refuse to listen, we are to then just let them be.

In THEIR doctrine…we are all members of the House of War, to be converted and if we refuse, to be enslaved or treated as second class citizens having less rights, less protections, more duties (taxes) than Muslims. Now, from a socio-political perspective that makes a certain amount of sense. But from a religious one?

If their doctrine is right, why would God command his people to act that way? Just because"?

:signofcross:
 
Islam has been guilty of all those things since Muhammad founded it! That is Islam’s way.

Is it justice for Muslims to drive Greenlanders from their homes by attacking and harassing them as this reports?

Vickie
Booklover, please read some good books and find out the truth and use your brain too to sift falsehood from truth.

If all the Muslims were force converted muslims, that means unwilling Muslims, would they fight the christian forces of Kaisar or Kisra (Iranians) so whole heartedly? That is the key answer to your false claim of foced conversions. I tell you clearly that Islam does not allow any forced conversion.

It was by the sublime pure true teachings of Islam that people of many nations accepted Islam and went out to fight the aggressors with all might. Then there was pure spiritualism spread by the Saints ( Aulia Allah, the friends of Allah). That was a pure message of love for all, Hatred for none which won over the hearts of most people in India and far East… There was no aggression.

The topic here is turning to politics of the israelis and Palestians. Replies are being given to the protestors. I have least (interest) to do with any politics. I keep politics away from religion. The message of Muhammad was perfectly spiritual. There was no politics. But the bad people (forces) forced muhammad to use force to repel force. He was forced into some politics. Otherwise his program was hundred percent peaceful, like that of Jesus or Moses a.s.
 
inJesus this is not right. If you are a believing and practicing christian, you will not be harmed. paying Jizyah is no problem. It is for your security and safety and for the safety of few muslims living in the christian controlled lands. So that they are not harmed.

Planten, jizya is humiliation. I do not want to be humiliated to be protected since i want to be protected against your ideologies.
Simple thing is: You are not a Kafir, You are not an infidel, as per the teaching of the Quran. Beileve it or leave it.
 
If all the Muslims were force converted muslims, that means unwilling Muslims, would they fight the christian forces of Kaisar or Kisra (Iranians) so whole heartedly? That is the key answer to your false claim of foced conversions. I tell you clearly that Islam does not allow any forced conversion.
 
links
(haven’t viewed them, but from mostly orthodox sources
scripturelink.googlepages.com/search?cx=001763116401597409521%3Af7idlv7awxw&cof=FORID%3A11&q=Islam#1214
scripturelink.googlepages.com/search?cx=001763116401597409521%3Af7idlv7awxw&cof=FORID%3A11&q=Islam#1212
scripturelink.googlepages.com/search?cx=001763116401597409521%3Af7idlv7awxw&cof=FORID%3A11&q=Islam+differences#1195
scripturelink.googlepages.com/search?cx=001763116401597409521%3Af7idlv7awxw&cof=FORID%3A11&q=Islam+differences#1367

Catholic Culture : Commentary : Articles : Instilling the Mind of …28 Sep 2007 … It is possible to identify the remarkable differences which separate Islam from the Judeo-Christian tradition without resorting to the …
www.catholicculture.org/commentary/articles.cfm?id=215
Labeled All the select… Balance search News and infor… Historic Docum…

A Look Inside the Koran and the BibleFather Griffith: The differences between Islam and Christianity are several; two of the most significant of them concern Christology and the theology of …
www.ewtn.com/library/SCRIPTUR/ZKORAN.HTM
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top