Catholicism verses Islam differences and similarities

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ted_in_Charlott
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oops … I apologize for the confusion here. The book gives a detailed view of how muslims have suffered at the hands of west. I didn’t mean to hurt anyone’s feelings. I am a muslim and I respect Christianity (because according to my reading its closest to Islam) and I never blame Christianity based on the wrong doings of modern day Christians. Because, just like its unjust to judge Islam based on some idiosyncratic view of Bin Laden or Zawahri, similarly it would be devilish to judge Christianity based on the wrong doings of Christians.

Please refer to my post #14 to read how I feel about Christianity.

Cheers,
Umer
Code:
                                                                                           Thank You brother.    We should Never blame entire religions or nations  on the few Major   illegal Troublemaker LEADERS  who   faselly Use   religion to  push THEIR agendas  immorally.             A firm, honest Catholic, who lives as Lord Taught.
 
If, if, if, if, if, if, if, if.

Let us make up a reality and pretend for the moment that there is an Islamic state.
You made the suggestion an Islamic state would make the difference. I just asked the question.
We ask the questions
Q1) Does it have to fight non-Muslims to make them Muslim?
A1) No, in fact that isn’t even allowed.
Your Quran seems to disagree with you.
Q1) Is it allowed to fight at all?
A1) Depends. It is only allowed to fight if it is attacked, or if another country is persecuting its population based on religion.
Above you said it isn’t even allowed, and here you give exceptions. Who made the exceptions?
And since in general that isn’t happening…
In general?
the answer is
History seems to disagree with you.
Bummer for you, I guess. 🙂
Why would I be bummed out if your claims are true. And since in general your claims are not…

bummer for the non-Miuslim where ever they be found.
 
**[5.59] Say: O followers of the Book! do you find fault with us (for aught) except that we believe in Allah and in what has been revealed to us and what was revealed before, and that most of you are transgressors?

[5.60] Say: Shall I inform you of (him who is) worse than this in retribution from Allah? (Worse is he) whom Allah has cursed and brought His wrath upon, and of whom He made apes and swine,** and he who served the Shaitan; these are worse in place and more erring from the straight path.

i am not sure who is being called apes and swine here. please explain.
You asked me to reply so I will try to do that. Who is being called apes and swine? The people who served Shaytaan, the people who did evil, and their punishment was to become apes and swine. That was a punishment for a single generation. Just like some people were punished by being drowned in a flood, like the people of Noah, or in the sea like Pharaoh and his troops, or a city burned like Sodom and Gomorrah, this is just another example of a punishment mentioned in the Qur’an. It does not apply to people later, and it would not be in anyway appropriate to refer to any group of people on the earth as descendents of apes and swine–they were punished, they did not go on to have children bearing resemblance to apes and pigs or anything like that.
i think most of us are trying really hard to discern if the quran is being misinterpreted for political power or not. i know i have cringed myself hearing some of the things Christian fundamentalists have preached and i get upset at how the message of love gets distorted. the Bible can be hard to understand, but when a Catholic comes to a passage that does not appear to be a message of love, we can go to the Church for guidance as to it’s interpretation.
It’s really important to view any text like the Bible or the Qur’an in its context. The Qur’an is obviously being twisted for political power. There are verses in it which have their place, and their time, which are being pulled and put in improper places. Muslims also, when unsure of the meaning of some verses, refer their questions to scholars and those more able to answer.
please explain the peaceful message to be found in quran here:
**
[9.29] Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.
[9.30] And the Jews say: Uzair is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!**
what do you do if one muslim takes a different meaning out of quran than another muslim? who has final say as to what is the correct meaning?
i also want to say that words can not express how awesome it is that people of varying faiths from all over the world can have this discussion! we should pray for those that live in fear and can not express their questions. God gave us brains to explore ideas and hearts to know to always love the individual no matter how wrong you think they are.
Peace be unto all of us.
Jen
First of all, just like the laypeople among the Catholics may not interpret the Bible on their whim, Muslims are not allowed to interpret the Qur’an for law. That job is reserved for people who have been qualified for it by their teachers, who were qualified by their teachers, and so on. A Muslim who tries to do that is really opening a door to sin if he does that.

Your two quotes here actually hinge on two different issues. It is the end of one passage and beginning of another.

Regarding the first quote, either one of two scenarios will apply.

The first scenario of the non-Muslim is that he is actually at war with the Muslims. The rules of war then apply. (And by the way, it is forbidden in Islam to kill women, children, and the elderly in war.)

The second scenario is that he is not at war, so he has a peace treaty with the Muslims or is living under Muslim rule, in which case his life, honour and wealth are protected, and it is not permissible to transgress against him. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) warned against transgressing against or wronging a kaafir whose rights are protected, as he said: “Whoever does wrong to a mu’aahad (a kaafir who has a peace treaty with the Muslims), or tries to put him down, or burdens him with more than he can bear, or takes something from him without his consent, I will be his opponent on the Day of Resurrection.” Narrated by Abu Dawood, 3052; classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood.
from here

The second verse is talking about what is considered blasphemy in Islam and that the punishment for it is with Allah.
 
You made the suggestion an Islamic state would make the difference. I just asked the question.

Your Quran seems to disagree with you.

Above you said it isn’t even allowed, and here you give exceptions. Who made the exceptions?

In general?

History seems to disagree with you.

Why would I be bummed out if your claims are true. And since in general your claims are not…

bummer for the non-Miuslim where ever they be found.
Code:
                                                                                           Sister Amy is Correct.   The Koran forbids killing, fighting, except in defense of Faith or Country. Which is the SAME teaching we have, from 1700  Years ago.                                                      The  famed big  Muslim-using For  conquest Saladin famously Aploogized  to the World  before his  death, for the wrongs they committed.  The Emperor , who tried to conquer   Europe, was stopped by my forebearers at  Vienna.    He Apologized to the World.
 
Are these formerly Jewish or Catholic cultures?
The places I hear about it happening most seem to be India, Pakistan, Jordan (uuggghhh) and sometimes Palestine, plus various places throughout Africa. I don’t think it has anything to do with Judaism or Catholicism. I’ve heard one person argue that it was related to the Code of Hammurabi but I haven’t seen that substantiated. It’s certainly forbidden in Islam. It is an ignorant, tribal practice.
or Egypt or Saudi Arabia
Actually, I don’t hear about it too often in Egypt or Saudia… Jordan and Pakistan the most. and the reason I said it has spread is because of immigrants. When immigrants who hold on to this stupid cultural practice, act on it, that’s what I mean by it spreading. I mean if you see an honor killing in Canada, how much you wanna bet it’s an immigrant?
Sister Amy, I don’t think you were telling the whole truth.
I’m sorry you don’t believe me–I’m not sure what you think I wasn’t telling the truth about. It is a practice which predates Islam, is not encouraged or even allowed in Islam but is in fact prohibited, it’s murder plain and simple. Islam has a procedure for dealing with women and men who behave inappropriately but honor killing is NOT that procedure. So it is a clear violation of Shari’ah law.
 
You made the suggestion an Islamic state would make the difference. I just asked the question.

Your Quran seems to disagree with you.
Not if you look at the whole thing instead of what ever pieces you like to pick and choose.
Above you said it isn’t even allowed, and here you give exceptions. Who made the exceptions?
God Almighty made the exceptions. Do you think a country should be able to defend itself if it is attacked?
 
The places I hear about it happening most seem to be India, Pakistan, Jordan (uuggghhh) and sometimes Palestine, plus various places throughout Africa. I don’t think it has anything to do with Judaism or Catholicism. I’ve heard one person argue that it was related to the Code of Hammurabi but I haven’t seen that substantiated. It’s certainly forbidden in Islam. It is an ignorant, tribal practice.

Actually, I don’t hear about it too often in Egypt or Saudia… Jordan and Pakistan the most. and the reason I said it has spread is because of immigrants. When immigrants who hold on to this stupid cultural practice, act on it, that’s what I mean by it spreading. I mean if you see an honor killing in Canada, how much you wanna bet it’s an immigrant?

I’m sorry you don’t believe me–I’m not sure what you think I wasn’t telling the truth about. It is a practice which predates Islam, is not encouraged or even allowed in Islam but is in fact prohibited, it’s murder plain and simple. Islam has a procedure for dealing with women and men who behave inappropriately but honor killing is NOT that procedure. So it is a clear violation of Shari’ah law.
I keep hearing the stock phrase “it is forbidden in Islam” ad nauseam, and those things keep being done by Muslims in the name of Allah and Islam all the time.:rolleyes:

Vickie
 
I keep hearing the stock phrase “it is forbidden in Islam” ad nauseam, and those things keep being done by Muslims in the name of Allah and Islam all the time.:rolleyes:

Vickie
It is forbidden in Islam.

Tell them it is forbidden in Islam, instead of telling me it is allowed. It’s like you want Muslims to be evil people… I don’t. Do you?
 
Code:
                                                                                           Sister Amy is Correct.   The Koran forbids killing, fighting, except in defense of Faith or Country. Which is the SAME teaching we have, from 1700  Years ago.                                                      The  famed big  Muslim-using For  conquest Saladin famously Aploogized  to the World  before his  death, for the wrongs they committed.  The Emperor , who tried to conquer   Europe, was stopped by my forebearers at  Vienna.    He Apologized to the World.
Why does the Quran call for fighting and killing in every other verse to spread the faith? I agree, it has been that way since the begining.
 
It is forbidden in Islam.

Tell them it is forbidden in Islam, instead of telling me it is allowed. It’s like you want Muslims to be evil people… I don’t. Do you?
Shouldn’t the imams and mullahs be the ones to interpret the teachings correctly to them then??:rolleyes:

Vickie
 
Shouldn’t the imams and mullahs be the ones to interpret the teachings correctly to them then??:rolleyes:

Vickie
Yeah, and they do.

But imagine if you are a crazy terrorist trying to convince 1.3 billion people to take up arms for your cause, using religion to bolster your position… what would say about the real religious leaders who refute you?

Naturally, you would call them disbelievers or other silly nonsense.

So who would you take your religion from… the scholar… or the terrorist? Who do you think I should take my religion from?
 
I keep hearing the stock phrase “it is forbidden in Islam” ad nauseam, and those things keep being done by Muslims in the name of Allah and Islam all the time.:rolleyes:

Vickie
Code:
                                                                                           You have fallen by very much false hype. those who  use the name of God or Allah, or the  Bible  or the  Koran, do so FALSELLY,  or been brainwashed to, to fight an  'evil'  they have  been programmed with.  Violence is never justified, except self defense.  Hatred is  Never   ever justified, as the Koran and Bible both teach.                                                                               
                                                                                           Be aware of  too many  false hype hate spinners, 'selling their agenda', using religion Falselly .                                                 Vivat Jesus   Tony
Islam and And Catholic Church have been massivelly defamed, ‘spun’ falselly for many centuries, as are being done now by a few with special interests of hate on both sides. Sister Amy is very honest, no spin expert on true islam. Am very knowledgeable No spin expert on both. Please see my Above Very detailed overviews at #61 and #77. Very mind opening, and explains, refutes much false hype.
 
The places I hear about it happening most seem to be India, Pakistan, Jordan (uuggghhh) and sometimes Palestine, plus various places throughout Africa. I don’t think it has anything to do with Judaism or Catholicism. I’ve heard one person argue that it was related to the Code of Hammurabi but I haven’t seen that substantiated. It’s certainly forbidden in Islam. It is an ignorant, tribal practice

Actually, I don’t hear about it too often in Egypt or Saudia… Jordan and Pakistan the most. and the reason I said it has spread is because of immigrants. When immigrants who hold on to this stupid cultural practice, act on it, that’s what I mean by it spreading. I mean if you see an honor killing in Canada, how much you wanna bet it’s an immigrant?

I’m sorry you don’t believe me–I’m not sure what you think I wasn’t telling the truth about. It is a practice which predates Islam, is not encouraged or even allowed in Islam but is in fact prohibited, it’s murder plain and simple. Islam has a procedure for dealing with women and men who behave inappropriately but honor killing is NOT that procedure. So it is a clear violation of Shari’ah law.
Sister Amy,

I’m going to accept your answer. Obviously you know your beliefs.

But how many dishonor killing sympathizers (even if they never act) are there for every “Sister Amy” out there?

The problem to me seems to be that every Muslim leader is his own authority and can teach whatever he wants. Which really doesn’t fit into this thread.

See ya.
 
Why does the Quran call for fighting and killing in every other verse to spread the faith? I agree, it has been that way since the begining.
Every other verse?

Killing and fighting in every other verse to spread the faith? Islam isn’t allowed to be spread by fighting–there is no compulsion in religion, remember?

But if you really think that every other verse is talking about killing and fighting, my friend, you need to pick up a Qur’an. Try reading Surat Ar-Rahman (55). Seriously. 🙂 Every other verse… lol
 
Yeah, and they do.

But imagine if you are a crazy terrorist trying to convince 1.3 billion people to take up arms for your cause, using religion to bolster your position… what would say about the real religious leaders who refute you?

Naturally, you would call them disbelievers or other silly nonsense.

So who would you take your religion from… the scholar… or the terrorist? Who do you think I should take my religion from?
Neither one! One calls for violence and the others commit it!

Vickie
 
Sister Amy, honour killing is related to sexual impurity…if a woman is married, she must be stoned right? who will stone her? is her father or brother ok?

on what basis is honour killing rejected if killing adulterers is ok? is it about the way it is done of is there somethin else?
 
Sister Amy, honour killing is related to sexual impurity…if a woman is married, she must be stoned right? who will stone her? is her father or brother ok?

on what basis is honour killing rejected if killing adulterers is ok? is it about the way it is done of is there somethin else?
One Muslim father killed his 17 year old daughter simply for falling in love with a British soldier.

Vickie
 
One Muslim father killed his 17 year old daughter simply for falling in love with a British soldier.

Vickie
am trying to understand…a woman with questionable behavior, is she a threat to the ummah? threat to other women? should she be stoned? confined? men can beat such a woman, but should she be killed? by who? and who decides and based on what? Amy do you know about such cases?
 
One Muslim father killed his 17 year old daughter simply for falling in love with a British soldier.

Vickie
Code:
                                                                                                                                                                                          Honor killing is  forbidden by islamic and  civil law,   as Amy explained above.      'honor  killing'  is insane  Radical  attitude by a few.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top