And where does the unborn stand in this? Where is their choice in the matter? Why should they be at the mercy of their mothers’ legal choice to kill them? Who is going to turn a blind eye to their cries?
Please state your hierarchy of good and evil. Thanks.
And what matter involved with “turning the country around” is of such high value that justifies the cost of either supporting, putting up with, or turning a blind eye to the million unborn killed each year? The economy? Would such motivation be ones personal comfort and pocketbook? Obama’s agenda is to increase the availability of abortion and even to expand it to include children who are already born. Is the promise of getting free money from those who have more, or some other form of socialist redistribution worth the blood of the innocent? (Don’t hold your breath waiting for any free money though). Is there any issue or issues that Obama supports that justify ignoring his demonic support for the intrinsic evil of the slaughter of the innocent?
And his support of the blood of the innocent is an example of those good morals?
Which is it the economy? (Let’s see, we are now blessed with a man of perverted morals bent on passing the FOCA bill and appointed pro-abortion justices and approved overseas spending on abortion in addition to a failing economy). Was that worth it? Is it the war? More innocent are killed in a week than during the duration of all of the Iraq and Afganistan situation. In addition, the war is not motivated by the desire to murder to innocent, nor is the war an intrinsic evil in which no Catholic may support under pain of mortal sin. Abortion is however, and the Church has made this crystal clear. Further, is whatever his vague plan concerning the war is, justification for allowing the deaths of the unborn to continue? Did you know that “the big picture” is right in front of your nose?
Hierarchy means a ranking of values, beliefs, or morals from top to bottom, or bottom to top. For instance, in the area of absolutes, death would be at the bottom and life at the top. What would yours be? For instance where would protection of the innocent lie in your hierarchy of values, or morals?
So by not being a “one-issue voter”, you cast aside the most perverted abomination taking place in our country resulting in the deaths of millions of innocents (the missing arm) and instead focus on the multitude of personal comfort issues which have nothing to do with innocent people being deliberately killed with the government’s blessing (the bandage on the knee)?
If someone intentionally kills an innocent person that is a grave evil no matter how culpable one is before God or not.
Does “good morals” include support for legalized homicide?
Thank you fix. It is a grave evil, regardless of the person’s intentions. Things that are evil don’t become not evil just because someone (or the majority of people) don’t think they are evil. We do not live in a relativistic world, much to the surprise of most of modern society. Judgment is saying, “You, so-and-so, are going to Hell for the things you have done” not “This action is a grave evil.”
**What makes them the “most precious of God’s children”? Does God play favorites?