F
Fidelis
Guest
La Chiara:
This is undisputed, but it is not, in itself, a good excuse for Catholics not reading the Bible.Catholics obviously do not have a tradition of reading the Bible, while Protestants have the tradition.
This is also undisputed but again, that was then, this is now. And the fact that there are illiterate Catholics now does not prevent those of us who are literate from reading the Bible.The reasons individual Catholics don’t read the Bible (at home) is very much tied to our traditions as pointed out earlier. 1. Catholicism descended from Judaism–which didn’t and probably still doesn’t have a tradition of reading its Scriptures at home. 2. Many Catholics were not literate-- a fact that continues today in many parts of the world. 3. Bibles were hand written until the printing press. So for nearly 1500 of the last 2000 years, Bibles were not available to the faithful.
Again, that was then, this is now. As I pointed out above, the Church has always encouraged Scripture reading by the faithful, and we have the example of many great saints. In our own time there is no good excuse not to.It is very difficult to change tradition–especially when that entails ADDING something. Traditions are more likely to be dropped, but adding traditions require something of people. So as the factors that caused Catholics not to read their Bibles early on changed, Catholics did not adopt a tradition to reading the Bible.
Nobody said it was, and in fact I pointed out it was not objectively necessary for salvation. Let me reiterate, since you must have missed it:It is not like it is a sin (that must be confessed) if we don’t read the Bible. It is encouraged–but then so are a lot of things that people don’t do (like get exercise, eat well, brush and floss, etc.)
, but Scripture reading by Catholics accomplishes two important things:Is Bible reading objectively necessary for salvation, like baptism and the obedience of faith? No
- Scripture reading actually provides many graces to enable one to to live a holy life. Apart from the lessons it provides, holy reading --like prayer and good works— builds one up in sanctification and strengthens one against temptation and a weakening of faith. This is why the Church has gone so far to attaching a partial indulgence to a half hours pious bible reading a day.
- Reading sacred Scripture builds one up in the knowledge of Christ and the Faith, especially as when it is read with the mind of the Church. When one is familiar enough with the Scriptures to defend his own faith and the bolster the faith of others (like our children), one can be instrumental in preventing the losing of souls to secularism or non-Catholic religions which are always on the hunt for the lukewarm and ignorant in their faith.
Excoriate? Can you show me where anyone has excoriated Catholics for not reading the Bible? (unless by *excoriation * you include the pointing out of the simple fact that it is so, which you seem to agree with).And while we are on the subject, many adult Protestants I know have a Wednesday Bible study and often an adult Bible study on Sunday too. Shall we excorciate Catholics for not doing that as well?
Then I stand corrected. It actually was your intent to accuse those (including the Vatican commission in the original post) who point out the fact that Catholics don’t read their Bibles, of being insincere and calculating. Thanks for the clarification.fidelis: Au contraire, I am not (and have not been) “unclear” on the meaning of disingenuous. I did not need to go to the dictionary (or have you look up the word) to know that it was precisely the term I intended! Thanks the same.:tiphat: