LOL
Yeah, that’s exactly what I do…I didn’t know it myself, but that’s what I do. Because some stranger on an internet forum who have absolutely no clue on the degree of knowledge I have of history, knows better than I do what I ignore and what I take into account
I know this. Your point please…

How on Earth does THAT follow from my argument???
If I am wrong, then I am wrong. But please use genuine arguments to try to convince me of it.
So who defines what usage of a word is “true”?
- Should the second person singular and plural in English “you” be substituted for its older equivalent “thou?”, because “you” used to refer be used the way “thou” is today, while “thou” was used the way “you” is today?
(did ya follow?)
- Should all English-speaking people everywhere start learning Old English, and how should this be accomplished, with virtually all source material “contaminated” by foreign influce, particularly from Scandinavia and Normandy.
Indeed. That only shows that the meaning of this word has evolved through time to mean something it did not originally mean. I fail to see how this supports your position, though?
That would probably be best, yes.
And you.