M
Michael_Francis
Guest
I was asked by CM to fix his poll and add the two votes for those of you who asked for “the other” option. I hope that helps.
MF
MF
Thanks very much!I was asked by CM to fix his poll and add the two votes for those of you who asked for “the other” option. I hope that helps.
MF
I actually was baptized as a Catholic, practiced until after college, and then fell away. I never understood the Church’s teachings. I was given a Bible by a Baptist at a Christian music festival that a Catholic friend took me to. I actually read the Bible, which I had never done previously. I realized that the Catholic Church teachings are completely supported by the Bible, and there is no contradiction. I confessed to God and to my priest, then came back to the Catholic Church. Since then, I have joined an adult Sunday school class at my parish, which is Bible study. God’s Word is what led me back to His Church! :bible1:I have 2 bibles the NAB and KJV.
I wish one of the options was some where between a “cradle” Catholic and “convert”… Long story whyJust wished it was an option.
![]()
Nope, none of those in the Protestant KJV, or in most other Protestant bibles. I suppose I am going to have to get one of those Catholic ones sooner or later. Back when I was a teen-age whiz-kid in the Lutheran Church, I was able to rattle off all the books in the (Protestant) Bible in order, start to finish. O well, and so it goesDoes your KJV have the deuterocanonical books and apocrypha though Harry?
If not you might want to download the extra books from the online Douay-Rheims version here. This translation dates thirty-odd years before the KJV, so the language is similar. I find the naming and numbering of some of the books confusing, but be assured they’re all there and then some and you’ll soon catch on![]()
Oh well, happens to the best of usNope, none of those in the Protestant KJV, or in most other Protestant bibles. I suppose I am going to have to get one of those Catholic ones sooner or later. Back when I was a teen-age whiz-kid in the Lutheran Church, I was able to rattle off all the books in the (Protestant) Bible in order, start to finish. O well, and so it goes
Thanks CMI was asked by CM to fix his poll and add the two votes for those of you who asked for “the other” option. I hope that helps.
MF
To begin with, your friend is making two different points. We (normally) don’t bring Bibles to Mass because the Mass is not a Bible study. We have missals for Mass for following the readings and the prayers. We have Bibles for Bible studies. Many evangelical and fundamentalists Sunday services are merely glorified and extended Bible studies not, properly speaking, worship involving sacrifice, as does the Mass. Thus the need for them to bring Bibles.Quote:
Go into any RC church today and just see how many people have a bible! As a matter of fact ask the first 100 Rc’s when they last read the Bible themselves.
Ignatius, The Holy Bible, Revised Standard Version, Catholic Edition,This is to offer some statistical response to an a-C who asserts:The Poll is multiple choice and public. Please feel free to post as to your Bible reading and any other responses you might feel are relevent.
I’ll start. I own several (over 10 I’m sure) Bibles in various editions and translations. My personal reading is done mostly from either the Douay-Rheims Version or the new RSV-CE 2nd Edition but I will refer to others if I feel the need, which is rare. Only a few are non-Catholics versions because I consider them incomplete without all 73 books. For personal study, I would not use a non-Catholic Bible.
I read some of the Bible every single day, and I often look up the Mass readings before I go to Mass and (since I don’t own a Missal [yet]) print them to take with me to daily Mass when I can go. I often carry my Bible with me to Mass or Eucharistic Adoration just because…
Pax Domini sit semper Vobiscum,
I have family members that belong to the LCMS. They have the same point of view as the section that is bolded.Not to distract or derail this thread but just to point some things out:
‘Gideons’ is the name of an organization which distributes Bibles. It is not a type of Bible or a translation. Most people who have a Gideons Bible probably have a KJV, a NKJV, or and NIV, in roughly that order–although I have seen a handful of other translations as well–including a couple of Catholic translations, including the Knox and Berkeley. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a Gideons edition of the Douay, though I suspect they distributed those once upon a time.
Several posters have mentioned having Bibles which are actually types of ‘reference’, ‘study’, ‘devotional’, or ‘youth’ Bibles. There are distinctions between these: ‘reference’ Bibles will have some sort of exhaustive index or concordance system; ‘study’ Bibles will have very good indexes, maps, and other material designed to assist in Bible study; ‘devotional’ Bibles will frequently omit indexes or concordances but be designed for use in daily reflecting or praying over Scripture; and ‘youth’ or similar specialty Bibles are devotional or study Bibles aimed at a particular audience.
Many of these are available in multiple translations, so that The Way, Extreme Teen Youth Bible and Catholic Youth Bible, (as examples) might be based on the same translation. Rarely would Protestants list such as ‘types of Bibles’: they would list Bibles by translation first, and then they might mention that they have three different editions of NIV study Bibles, four KJV’s
Finally: I think the OP might want to consider that folks who post to forums such as Catholic Answers are likely to be more serious about their faith than are other Catholics. Folks here are therefore much more likely to own and to use Bibles than run-of-the-mill Roman Catholics. I meet many Catholics who don’t read the Bible regularly outside of Mass. I have known Catholics who mention owning ‘a’ Bible as if they think this is some sort of unique distinction–but many of them will make it clear that they seldom or never read however many Bibles they happen to own. Of course, such people are also usually not regular attendees at Mass . . . .again please understand that I don’t wish to distract from this thread so please don’t feel the need to ‘defend’ your fellow-Catholics’ Bible reading habits here.
Then please don’t. Note the title of the thread:Not to distract or derail this thread but just to point some things out:
Which is the whole point of the thread and poll. Why would I want a survey of inactive or luke-warm Catholics and wish to use them as exemplary of a refutation to the quoted assertion any more than anyone in their right mind would try to use lax or unfaithful n-Cs as exemplary of proof of anything worthwhile concerning those myriad churches?Finally: I think the OP might want to consider that folks who post to forums such as Catholic Answers are likely to be more serious about their faith than are other Catholics.
Folks here are therefore much more likely to own and to use Bibles than run-of-the-mill Roman Catholics.