R
RobHom
Guest
Hmmmm, would that have been an attempt at an “obfuscatory non sequitur”?AH - tradition v. scripture. So if I pray to you right now, you will know what I am saying?
Hmmmm, would that have been an attempt at an “obfuscatory non sequitur”?AH - tradition v. scripture. So if I pray to you right now, you will know what I am saying?
This would make a lot more sense to me it Protestannts didnt turn around and ask the living to pray for them. Why? If Jesus gives you acess to him why use even the living as intermediaries?. I still don’t think I would ever pray to or through Mary, though. Jesus gives me access to Himself, and that seems enough.
OK…Nah - just rattlin’ your cage.
Ahhh, but that’s one to tread likely with, lest you be drawn in to having to explain why, if the at all possible, how it is that there are so, so, so many “different Christian denominations” outside the Catholic Church, and how is it that they all differ theologically as to what the Bible tells them…all the while the majority of them appear to embrace “sola scriptura” and or the other solas.But we could venture off on a sola scriptura debate, which I guess is what it comes down to. Do we believe in only what the Bible tells us, or do we follow tradition as well? (Just because the early Christians did it, doesn’t mean they were right.)
Stick around and ask your questions. If you truly seek to understand, you will receive the information that will give you the understanding. I can accept fully that you may not agree, but I can also accept that you can “understand”. There are probably tenets of your faith that I may not agree with, but I can understand them…Code:And there are lots of Catholic "traditions" that I could ask about. You know, I just want to try to understand some of the Catholic practices and doctrines better. I am thinking about the body of Christ comments, and will pray for understanding on this. I still don't think I would ever pray to or through Mary, though. Jesus gives me access to Himself, and that seems enough.
This is an inscription in the catacomb of St. Priscilla on the Via Balaria. In the inscription there is a figure of a dove of a fish figure of man kneeling in prayer.Prayer is communication with anybody . . .only in ‘recent times’ have a few people tried to narrow it down to ‘communication with God alone’. . .
The fact (and it is a fact) that the earliest Christians, being persecuted and living in the catacombs, scratched out prayers to their friends who had been martyred, reveals that the earliest Christians believed that prayer to the saints in Heaven was authentic Christian teaching. . .
Sadly, there are many churches out there that call themselves “Christian” but that have distorted or corruptedOK…
Ahhh, but that’s one to tread likely with, lest you be drawn in to having to explain why, if the at all possible, how it is that there are so, so, so many “different Christian denominations” outside the Catholic Church, and how is it that they all differ theologically as to what the Bible tells them…all the while the majority of them appear to embrace “sola scriptura” and or the other solas.
On that we can certainly agree.Sadly, there are many churches out there that call themselves “Christian” but that have distorted or corrupted God’s Truth.
Semantics… Convictions are based on theology. Otherwise the only possibility would be “ego”. I am aware of some of that, but I think for the most part …it is theology differentiation, or at a minimum “quasi-theological”.There are also many differences among mainstream Protestant churches, but they are not theological, more along the lines of “convictions” (like whether it’s ok to drink) or “preferences” (do you allow a praise band or only organ music in church). These differences don’t amount to theological differences,
Ahh, but at some point they do. Many declare one form of baptism or the other is the only way, and others claim its unnecessary, while others embrace OSAS, and other things. Its the how, why and wherefore arguments that tend to distort the central message.however, and they don’t change the central message of the Church that is salvaton through Jesus Christ crucified and risen.
Yes, as it has always been, though there is and always has been just a little more to it theologically…This is the same central message of the Catholic Church, isn’t it?
Its not a requirement. So, OK.Look, I don’t think my NOT praying to Mary is going to offend God.
That may well be, and frankly none of us will know until we die, but the fact remains…we Catholics believe in “intercessory prayer” which is Biblical, and is well documented in the writings of the ECF’s, an scrolls have been found…one of the better known is the Sub Tuum… You might find it interesting:I’m just not convinced the opposite is true.
OSAS? I don’t know what that is, but the form of baptism doesn’t matter. Baptism is an outward sign of an inward change. The thief on the cross had no opportunity for baptism at all (or confession or penance) and yet he was assured that day to be with Jesus in Paradise, just because he believed. Preferences to sprinkle or immerse, adults v. babies still don’t change the salvation message. God made it so simple, but we just seem to want to complicate it all the time. Just like Paul told the Galatians - why do you want to go backwards and imprison yourselves in the law? (My paraphrase.)Ahh, but at some point they do. Many declare one form of baptism or the other is the only way, and others claim its unnecessary, while others embrace OSAS, and other things. Its the how, why and wherefore arguments that tend to distort the central message.
OKNot to hijack the thread. We should go back to Mary.![]()
Hopefully, this will put to rest the belief that prayer is worship or adoration:I’d have to work to find a citation for you, but one reason is “wherever 2 or 3 are gathered in my name, I am there.” And the other reason has to do with praying in accord, and that’s the one I’d have to work on. Also, Jesus modeled praying for one another for us when he prayed for his disciples and for all believers in the garden.
I guess praying with living people doesn’t seem the same to me as praying to deceased people. Is praying to Mary or a saint different from praying to say, your dead uncle? Is that also effective prayer? I just think that it takes the focus off of God, and for some people, the difference between praying to and worshipping may be a fine line. For me, it’s better left alone.
Hopefully, this will put to rest the belief that prayer is worship or adoration:
Merriam-Webster’s 11th Collegiate Dictionary:
2 : to address God or a god with adoration, confession, supplication, or thanksgiving.
I believe wholeheartedly in the resurrection and in life eternal. I’m just not convinced that anyone but God can hear my prayers. And I still say that praying to anyone but God takes the focus off of Him, the only One worthy of our worship. In prayer, I seek communion with God and my prayers include praise, confession and thankgiving as well as intercession. Why would I address this to anyone but God?
Sorry, Elvis, still doesn’t convince me. Plus your definition contradicts your purpose in citing it:
Merriam-Webster’s 11th Collegiate Dictionary:elvisman;4659124 said:Hopefully, this will put to rest the belief that prayer is worship or adoration:
2 : to address God or a god with adoration, confession, supplication, or thanksgiving.
I believe wholeheartedly in the resurrection and in life eternal. I’m just not convinced that anyone but God can hear my prayers. And I still say that praying to anyone but God takes the focus off of Him, the only One worthy of our worship. In prayer, I seek communion with God and my prayers include praise, confession and thankgiving as well as intercession. Why would I address this to anyone but God?
Contradicts? I think not.
willingheart -
I believe that this is (as well as some of your other posts) a clear-cut case of, "There is truly none so blind as they who refuse to see."
In citing the one definition that you did - you ignored the other 3:
- ENTREAT, IMPLORE — often used as a function word in introducing a question, request, or plea <pray be careful>
- to get or bring by praying
***intransitive verb ***
- to make a request in a humble manner
I could have left out the last definition, but chose to keep it in so you could see that your definition of prayer is not even considered to be the 1st listed - or the 2nd.
If you have ever asked anybody to pray for you - or if you have prayed for anybody - you have done what you claim is wrong.
That, my friend is hypocrisy.
elvisman;4659434 said:If you have ever asked anybody to pray for you - or if you have prayed for anybody - you have done what you claim is wrong.
Now you’re back-peddling. Here is what you said:What? I never said it was wrong to pray for someone or to ask someone to pray for you. I only question the practice of praying to dead people.
And I never disagreed with any of your definitions of prayer, either. Only point out that one of them specifically mentions prayer as a means of giving adoration and worhip to God. I agree with that also, which is why I direct my prayers only to Him.
elvisman;4659679**This means that Jesus is a liar because he said many times in Scripture that those who believed in him and did the will of his Father would have eternal life. [/quote said:Matt. 25:46, John 3:14-16, John 6:40, 44, 47, 54 58, to name a few verses.
OK so you caught me being semantically careless. Of course Jesus is not a liar. And of course believers have eternal life with Jesus. What I meant was I’m not convinced I should or can pray to those who have crossed over from this life to the next, other than to Jesus himself. By “dead” I meant those who are no longer alive on earth.
SO WE ARE NOT TO PRAY TO PEOPLE IN HEAVEN Intercessory Prayer of SaintsOK so you caught me being semantically careless. Of course Jesus is not a liar. And of course believers have eternal life with Jesus. What I meant was I’m not convinced I should or can pray to those who have crossed over from this life to the next, other than to Jesus himself. By “dead” I meant those who are no longer alive on earth.
P.S. Here’s another point to ponder - I once heard a man speak about his love for Mary and devotion to her. He was sharing about another’s way of explaining to his Protestant friend about our ways of honoring her. His friend said that he’d had such a deep** fear of God **that it was easier for him to open his heart to God’s Mother than it was to open it to God for fear of offending God, so all his little loves he gave to her instead. He talked to her, prayed to her, did all sorts of stuff to honor her. Once when he was lying ill and at death’s door, he had a “vision” while in delirium from fever. In it he saw all his little loves for Mary gathered up like flowers by the angels and carried to Mary herself and given to God at His throne where they were even more magnified. God spoke to Him and said something like this “what you did for her, you did for Me. Love her always.” He never doubted his devotion to her again.
Peace,
Gail
So, does that mean it is wrong for me to make a statue of someone else, say george Washington, for example, and have that in my house too? Would I then be worshipng George Washington?** If any one praises Mary and respects her, we do not mind. But if any one will bow down to Mary or her statue or make any statue and keep it in any house, that will become idol worship.**
We do not worship Mary. We honor her and pray to her to interceed for us to her Son. The only person worthy of worship is the Holy Trinity (the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit)I have been a Catholic all of my life and I have never heard the Church tell its people that we must worship Mary. For that charge to be true, then please provide the genuine Catholic Church document which states that Catholics are to worship Mary? Did you ever think to go to the source for the answer to this one?