“This man” who is Bishop Robert Lynch confuses NO ONE. He has been very ill and hospitalized while other Board members of CHA made the FLAWED decision to back Obama rather than backing the US Conference of Catholic Bishops. Bishop Lynch has been highly public with his censure of CHA’s actions and there have been numerous articles quoting him re this over the past few days. It is the very radical “nuns” such as Sr. Carol Keehan who are confused.Then why on earth is the CHA standing in support of pro-abortion health care reform when the USCCB clearly has called it unacceptable?
This man confuses the faithful.
I hope he’s a good bishop. Perhaps he should consider separating himself from affiliation with the CHA (though that would have to be carefully weighed against the benefit of having a good bishop on the board who can try to keep them in line…)“This man” who is Bishop Robert Lynch confuses NO ONE. He has been very ill and hospitalized while other Board members of CHA made the FLAWED decision to back Obama rather than backing the US Conference of Catholic Bishops. Bishop Lynch has been highly public with his censure of CHA’s actions and there have been numerous articles quoting him re this over the past few days. It is the very radical “nuns” such as Sr. Carol Keehan who are confused.
Really- Google Bishop Robert Lynch!
His rebuke is everywhere.
It might help to recognize that the news service Catholic Press took a part of an article from LifeSite News about this issue. LifeSite News is a private non-profit that is not a Catholic agency.I hope he’s a good bishop. Perhaps he should consider separating himself from affiliation with the CHA (though that would have to be carefully weighed against the benefit of having a good bishop on the board who can try to keep them in line…)
From the article posted it was not clear that his personal stance was pro-life. It was confusing to ME, and it seems to me it’s likely confusing to other Church faithful. I read the article as Lynch hoping that the USCCB could align itself more closely with the CHA, not the other way around.