U
utunumsint
Guest
Interesting answers Sanduski and Linkowski. I need to study up more on this subject.
Thanks again,
Ut
Thanks again,
Ut
There is a mystery in this that I do not think we can understand - God’s sovereignty and man’s will/responsibility. Consider how these line up with eachother…
I agree that this is a profound mystery, and that it cannot be solved in a satisfactory way. Paul really doesn’t give an answer to the problem either. He just says, “who are you to question God?” which in my opinion, is not a copout. It is just a fact. We are not God. We are not omniscient and omnipotent.God’s grace in the calling of the elect to salvation cannot be resisted; both courses are predetermined.
Someone who had a kind of outward righteousness but has not yet submitted to the righteousness of God in salvation, yes. Especially if they know a great deal about the gospel…have been to church for years…and they fall away. Those people usually turn into a sinful wreck…“go and sin no more lest a worse thing come to you”. The more involved they get, the worse they are after they fall away. The ones who never do anything…they usually stay in church, do nothing, and become more and more numb to the gospel call to the point of becoming indifferent. They all did not hear properly…I’m not sure of the answer, but let me ask you (and I honestly don’t know the answer to this either):
Does God ever harden the heart of someone who was righteous before that time, or does God harden the hearts of those with previously hardened hearts only?
Isaiah 55:8-9 “For My thoughts are not your thoughts, Nor are your ways My ways,” declares the LORD. 9 "For as the heavens are higher than the earth, So are My ways higher than your ways And My thoughts than your thoughts.I agree that this is a profound mystery, and that it cannot be solved in a satisfactory way. Paul really doesn’t give an answer to the problem either. He just says, “who are you to question God?” which in my opinion, is not a copout. It is just a fact. We are not God. We are not omniscient and omnipotent.
But that word…predetermined or predestined really applies to God’s knowledge and power only. Since God is outside of time, all time, past, present, and future are one to him. When he created the world, he created it all at once. We are living in it in time. So in a sense, every free action we do, is known and caused by God, without diminishing the freedom of our actions. So Pharaoh cannot really say, God made me do it, because God’s causality is really on a level we cannot approach or fathom.
However, we who live in time and space, must relate to God in time and space. We cannot relate to the wold in the way God does to us. So predestination, for human beings, is irrelevant, unless you can know ahead of time that you are one of the elect.
So the question is, how can you know, infallibly, that you are one of the elect?
Ut
We have passages like this…Gensis. 4: 6-7, Yahweh asked Cain, ’ Why are you angry and downcast ? If you are doing right surley you ought hold your head high, but if you are not doing right, sin is crouching at the door hungry to get you. Yet you can still master him.
Comment: Who knows what Cain did to offend God, but offend God he did ! It was within Cains power to turn around from sin. Just as it does today. Anyway Jesus did not become man, to suffer and die to save the elect,it just doesen’t make sense.
Peace, OneNow1
I think Sandy and I were talking about this in the context of Scripture.Someone who had a kind of outward righteousness but has not yet submitted to the righteousness of God in salvation, yes. Especially if they know a great deal about the gospel…have been to church for years…and they fall away. Those people usually turn into a sinful wreck…“go and sin no more lest a worse thing come to you”. The more involved they get, the worse they are after they fall away. The ones who never do anything…they usually stay in church, do nothing, and become more and more numb to the gospel call to the point of becoming indifferent. They all did not hear properly…
Luke 8:18 “So take care how you listen; for whoever has, to him more shall be given; and whoever does not have, even what he thinks he has shall be taken away from him.”
They merely “tasted” the gifts and were enlightened and had intellectual knowledge.
Quote=OneNow1 In my comment I meant to say just the elect .We have passages like this…
1 John 2:2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.
Hebrews 2:9 But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honour; that he by the grace of God should taste death for every man.
1 Timothy 2:6 KJV 6 Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.
But then we have…
John 10:11 KJV 11 I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep.
John 10:15 KJV 15 As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep.
His death was sufficient for all…efficient for some (the sheep).
There aren’t any listed in the scripture. In the NT, some references to hardening are quoted from the OT; some are statements about people having hard hearts; some questions, “is your heart hard,” and some admonitions “do not harden your heart.”I’m not sure of the answer, but let me ask you (and I honestly don’t know the answer to this either):
Does God ever harden the heart of someone who was righteous before that time, or does God harden the hearts of those with previously hardened hearts only?
I don’t think we’re reading more into than there is. God specifically states the reasons for hardening:Exodus 9:16My opinion, and it is only an opinion, is that we may be reading into “God hardened his heart” a little more than there is.
It’s sort of like when Paul quotes, “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated”. It doesn’t carry over very well into today’s language.
Couldn’t it be argued that Paul is not talking about individuals here, but the hardening of Israel, and the softening of the gentile hearts? So Romans 9 is about Israel as a whole and the gentiles as a whole, but not about individuals? I mean, there were still many Jews who did convert, and many Gentiles who did not…In this Romans 9 passage, we see as well, and we see again, the order of things concerning God’s dealings with history, and men—the Potter, and the clay.
Romans 13:12-14 And do this because you know the time; it is the hour now for you to awake from sleep. For our salvation is nearer now than when we first believed; the night is advanced, the day is at hand. Let us then throw off the works of darkness (and) put on the armor of light; let us conduct ourselves properly as in the day, 4 not in orgies and drunkenness, not in promiscuity and licentiousness, not in rivalry and jealousy. But put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the desires of the flesh.
Aren’t these believers he is talking to? Don’t these quotes presume an effective free will? Don’t they also presume that something can be lost (e.g. election, or salvation, or justification)?1 Corinthians 9:24-27 Do you not know that the runners in the stadium all run in the race, but only one wins the prize? Run so as to win. Every athlete exercises discipline in every way. They do it to win a perishable crown, but we an imperishable one. Thus I do not run aimlessly; I do not fight as if I were shadowboxing. No, I drive my body and train it, for fear that, after having preached to others, I myself should be disqualified./
Yes, it is about conversion, repentance, justification, regeneration.In the “No one shall come to me except through the Father who draws him” phrase, it may help to see Jesus talking about conversion .
For no one converts unless God urges him, or…man left to his own will would not come toward God’s light; but it is man following God’s will that does this, and as God eternally wills that we come to Him, it is still up to the free will of the man to take God’s will as his own.
Can you give scriptural support this?God may “elect” some in that he confronts them more based on their disposition, their history, their psychology, etc.
Where does this assumption that election is a “free ride” come from?But this does not mean that he does not offer salavation to the others, nor that these “elect” have a free ride.
The work of conformity to the will of God, and to the image of the Son, is the work of the Spirit:2 Corinthians 3:18For those “elect” have to conform to the will of God
Absolelutely, no one seems to be concerned with the full context of chapters 9-11, I think you are absolelutely right:thumbsup:Couldn’t it be argued that Paul is not talking about individuals here, but the hardening of Israel, and the softening of the gentile hearts? So Romans 9 is about Israel as a whole and the gentiles as a whole, but not about individuals? I mean, there were still many Jews who did convert, and many Gentiles who did not…
My question is, are we over emphasizing Romans 9 by not keeping it in context? This question of the Jews versus the Gentiles would have been a important one for the Christians in Rome where there were many Jews. You don’t find Paul talking about these things in Corinth where they were mainly Gentiles.
Ut
Michael Howard:Couldn’t it be argued that Paul is not talking about individuals here, but the hardening of Israel, and the softening of the gentile hearts? So Romans 9 is about Israel as a whole and the gentiles as a whole, but not about individuals? I mean, there were still many Jews who did convert, and many Gentiles who did not…
Yes, re-read what I said:Absolelutely, no one seems to be concerned with the full context of chapters 9-11, I think you are absolelutely right
This is what God did with Pharaoh—a vessel of wrath prepared for destruction—He demonstrated His wrath; made His power known; endured him with much patience. He did this to make known the riches of His glory upon the vessels of mercy prepared beforehand—Israel.
Paul says God is now doing to Israel, what He did to Pharaoh, to make known the riches of His glory upon the vessels of mercy prepared beforehand—the gentile Church (vv24-26).
As he continues, he assures Israel, and the Gentiles, that Israel is not completely forsaken, but that when the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled (Lk 21:24; Rom 11:25), Israel will be “grafted back in” (Rom 11).
I continually point this out to Catholics who attempt to say that Romans 11 says an individual can lose his salvation when the context of Romans 11 is the Jews, and the Gentiles church. Paul begins in Chapter one speaking of “the Jew first, and then the Gentile,” and chapter two, “the Jew first, and then the Gentile,” and so on, and so on.In this Romans 9 passage, we see as well, and we see again, the order of things concerning God’s dealings with history, and men—the Potter, and the clay.
I think there are many passages, especially in Paul, where he talks about the corporate fate of his nation. This would be an intensely important and personal issue for Paul. I don’t debate that salvation is a personal matter, but it can also be seen on a corporate level. I mean, God talks to the nations and individual nations all the time in the prophets.There are other verses, but these suffice to make the point that NT salvation is exclusively individual, and intensely personal.
I don’t know… I think it could be said that Jacob (wasn’t he called Israel by God?) and Pharaoh are prophetic models for the corporate fate of Israel and the Gentiles?That said, in Rom 9, individual salvation is in view, with the election of Jacob over Esau (v13), and the use of the singular verb for running in v16, and the use of masculine, singular pronouns—whom—in vv15, 18, and the hardening, and destruction of the singular Pharaoh, and then moving into the national mercy extended to Israel, and into the national hardening of Israel, and the mercy extended to Gentiles
**Yes, Indeed.Originally Posted by utunumsint
So Romans 9 is about Israel as a whole and the gentiles as a whole, but not about individuals
**Originally Posted by sandusky
There are other verses, . . . point that NT salvation is exclusively individual, and intensely personal.
Why the difficulty with individual salvation?I think there are many passages, especially in Paul, where he talks about the corporate fate of his nation. This would be an intensely important and personal issue for Paul. I don’t debate that salvation is a personal matter, but it can also be seen on a corporate level. I mean, God talks to the nations and individual nations all the time in the prophets.
I don’t know… I think it could be said that Jacob (wasn’t he called Israel by God?) and Pharaoh are prophetic models for the corporate fate of Israel and the Gentiles?
I have to go…I have a two year old who wants my attention.
Happy fathers day to all fathers!
Ut
I am talking about the context for Romans 9. That’s all. It doesn’t mention baptism at all. I have no difficulty with individual salvation.Why the difficulty with individual salvation?
You have a two-year-old child; I assume your child is baptized; when the priest baptized your child, did he baptize your child as a nation, or did he baptize your child as an individual?
Yes, Indeed.
The ‘all’ does not mean every man, woman, child that ever lived.
Thanks for this Tabcom. I like this metaphor.I remember when I first tried to get a hold of this concept I used a pizza as a metephor. All of the pizza is cut into individual slices. The slices have jewish and gentile toppings on top of the crust (bread). Within the gentile slices, there are red, yellow, white, black toppings. The jewish slices have different topping representing the 12 tribes of Israel. God has not finished adding the toppings to the pizza. He has an exact number of toppings to add, until it is complete.
:tiphat:Thanks for this Tabcom. I like this metaphor
**Predestined is associated with the believer. Not with the vessels of wrath.What I have a problem with is predestination to damnation.
What does vessels of wrath mean anyway?
** Does it necessarily mean individual hell and damnation,**Read the parable of ‘The Rich Man and Lazarus in Luke’ 16:19-34.
22 . . . the rich man also died and was buried. 23 In Hell, he lifted up his eyes, being in torment, . . .