K
kristenj239
Guest
Pray for your friend/family. I am pretty sure that you already know that it is wrong otherwise you would not be asking. That doesn’t mean that you should stop talking to them though. Everyone sins.
This is not accurate.That is right. You can be what you think, but you are what you do! If you think you are gay, but then you move on and live like a straight person, then you are actually not a gay. However, if you act on your gay impulse, then you become a gay.
This is like asking why some people are born with the genitalia of both male and female, or why some people find themselves having no empathy and interested in violating the rights of others. We live in a fallen world, and we suffer the consequences of original sin. There are a number of disorders in this world, like multiple sclerosis, cancers, etc.If that’s the case, why do so many people find themselves attracted to their own gender, while finding the opposite gender repulsive? How could such an abomination, on the face of the Natural Law, have ever come to be a reality?
I can’t imagine what you mean by this. We are all called to chastity. Unmarried persons are to refrain from sex, as well as divorced persons, priests, religious and others. Married persons are called to refrain from having sex with persons to whom they are not married. None of this is shunning, or forcing them to “do something repulsive”. How is it repulsive to control one’s sexual urges? What if one is attracted to sex with children? Is it repulsive to refrain?Why is a slice of the population doomed to either be shunned, or forced to comply with a Law that forces them to do something repulsive?
That’s precisely what I said. I said that “inclinations … are disordered.” An attraction and an inclination are the same. The Church does not say that the PEOPLE who have the attraction are disordered. That’s the only point I was trying to make.I think this is not accurate. The same sex attraction itself is considered a gravely disordered.
There are cases when a youngster matured, gave up gay inclination and became a straight person with family and kids. I would say to any gay person: it is possible, so do not exclude it from your life plans.This is not accurate.
I don’t understand the connection between “giving up the gay inclination” (if such a thing were possible) and starting a family with kids.There are cases when a youngster matured, gave up gay inclination and became a straight person with family and kids. I would say to any gay person: it is possible, so do not exclude it from your life plans.
Then they weren’t gay to begin with. You can’t “pray away the gay” . This is a very damaging concept that has hurt so many people. Typically what happens is they marry and have kids, then realize they can’t live the dishonest life of staying in the closet. It is traumatic for them, as well as their families they have created. Please stop advocating for this type of thing. In all charity, you sound quite uneducated on the topic and should consider learning about this matter if you feel the need to advise others about it.There are cases when a youngster matured, gave up gay inclination and became a straight person with family and kids. I would say to any gay person: it is possible, so do not exclude it from your life plans.
And as Sheen has said, “a lie is a lie even if everyone believes it, and the truth is the truth even though no one believes it.” But then again, anyone defending the direction of society against the guidance of the RCC and its leaders, isn’t going to listen to common sense, regardless of where it comes from.Sure. And most of the Christians on the planet think the RCC has it wrong.
But that’s not exactly news.
Actually, holy matrimony in the Catholic church is a life commitment. This is how it works.Getting married is an action that people with all sorts of inclinations can take
Is this a dogma?You can’t “pray away the gay”
My point is that they were then not gay to begin with. Sexual experimentation with the same sex does not make someone gay. Either you are gay or you aren’t. There is no, “I am gay today, but tomorrow I will stop being gay”. Activity does not define sexual orientation.Is this a dogma?I know people who lived the gay life as young and became absolutely reliable mothers afterward. You just want to tell people with adventurous life style that they have to feel like a gay forever. Not true. Some of them are not hardwired to be gay. Some of them can break free and be a normal woman.
When did I deny that? I myself am married – for life, praise the Lord! I did not in the course of my vows vow never to involuntarily find a man attractive from that day forward.Actually, holy matrimony in the Catholic church is a life commitment. This is how it works.
Sure, but are there any methods for getting rid of the inclination? Are they reliable?Gay people assume that their inclination is necessarily hard wired. For some, it might be. For others, it is not. It is like running 100 m in 20 seconds. Some people can do it, some others cannot. We are all different.
Haha! Who would know that in advance? Perhaps God Almighty?Either you are gay or you aren’t.
Once you realize that people use this word differently, and your meaning is not the generally used meaning, perhaps we can communicate more effectively.The fact is the gay act that makes someone gay.
You are conflating being gay with gay activity. They aren’t the same thing. If someone suggested to you that if you participated in a homosexual activity, that would mean you were no longer straight, do you think that is a correct statement?You say the person was not even gay. But who are you to judge someone if that person is gay or not? The fact is the gay act that makes someone gay. You cannot say that person was not gay because stopped acting like a gay. Did you know in advance that this person will overcome? No! Of course, you could not! Whatever you say in retrospect is something you cannot say before
No, it is actually a philosophical statement. You are not what you think you are. You are what you do.You are conflating being gay with gay activity.
I’m sure He’s relieved.I don’t judge Jesus.
Sexual orientation is not defined by action. It’s defined by most people with the initial attraction.You are not what you think you are. You are what you do.
If you think of “gay” as a morally blameworthy thing, then yes, you are right that what is blameworthy must involve ACTION. But you cannot change the language simply by saying that another way of using words would be more useful. In reality, “gay” means “attracted to the same sex, and not to the opposite sex”. Words have objective meanings, even if we find the meanings odious.No, it is actually a philosophical statement. You are not what you think you are. You are what you do.