C
ChiRho
Guest
SurelyWould you pray for me then?
SurelyWould you pray for me then?
Can you point me to any infallible teachings of the church in regards to speaking in tongues and the the way they are suppose to be received? I feel , John Salza is a reputable source as far as biblical scholarship, would you disagree? I could have brought forth a large array of other scholars and theologians of the more traditional verity, but I thought Mr. Salza was a good compromise.No, it contradicts most of what the church teaches on the gift of tongues and he even takes scripture out of context such as 1 corinthians 13:8.
Can you provide authentic magisterial teaching concerning the bolded?Now there is truth in some of what he said if put in the right context. The gift of tongues is perhaps the primary gift that can be used for personal edification. It can be your own personal prayer language to God, a language you have never sinned in.
You must understand what was happening in the corinthian church. A lot of what he said was accurate about what was going on. There were a lot of prideful people, and what he was trying to say is that if tongues is spoken in a prophetic way at a meeting(in the corinthian church what was happening is everyone was speaking in tongues at the same time and it was just a great clashing that helped nobody). [Then only one person should speak at a time and either that person or another person must be able to interpret the tongue. I know of one person that has this gift of interpreting tongues.**
So does the bolded happen at CCR event? Unquestionably? You say you know of one person whom can translate, does this one person translate all whom speak in tongues that cannot translate their speech themselves at all events in your parish, or is there possibly someone else?
rugger4christ;8321263:
Could you cite scripturally or magisterially your understanding of “prayer tongue “ versus a “prophetic tongue“? I have seen videos of numerous people speaking in tongue, without an obvious translator, and surely not speaking in turn. Is this supported by authentic magisterial teachings. I need undeniable proof that scripture and tradition have taught that, praising God in gibberish is accepted by our Church, since historically it is not supported well.Now at a lot of meetings you will see many people all praising God in tongues, this is not what St. Paul is talking about. It is fine for people to praise God in tongues and in their own language, but it is not edifying if someone speaks a message in tongues for the group and nobody can interpret.
Again, there is an apparent difference in this type of prayer, then what St. Paul spoke of. Could you please elaborate? Where does authentic Church teachings expand on this use of the HS? I would think that that after the first few times of “yielding” to the spirit it would become normalized and less-yielding. This seem like a psychological barrier more then a spiritual barrier.When I have been prayed over in tongues without an interpretation it has always been a very powerful thing for me and I can feel the presence of God powerfully. Speaking in tongues allows a person to be more greatly used by the holy spirit because it takes a great deal of humility for a person to babble in public. You really have to yield to God for this gift to operate.
I have always felt that St. Paul was speaking of greatest gift which is love, which you touched on in an odd way, St. Paul spoke of the gift of love never ending, although prophecy, tongues and even intellect “passing away”. Love the basis for all these gifts - as you implied - has never, and will never “pass away”. St. Chrysostom coined it well:1 Corinthians 12:31 “31 But earnestly desire the greater gifts.
And I show you a still more excellent way” St. Paul told us we not only must seek the greatest gifts but we must do so eagerly or earnestly. Why? The gifts are in general not for our personal benefit but for the benefit of God’s people for us to use in service through love. Did Jesus’s gift of healing benefit himself or others more? What about his gift of miracles?
[2.] Now then after that in every way he had shown her to be very exceedingly great, again he doth so from another most important head, by a fresh comparison exalting her dignity, and saying thus; “but whether there be prophecies, they shall be done away; whether there be tongues, they shall cease.” For if both these were brought in in order to the faith; when that is every where sown abroad, the use of these is henceforth superfluous. But the loving one another shall not cease, rather it shall even advance further, both here and hereafter, and then more than now. For here there are many things that Weaken our love; wealth, business, passions of the body, disorders of the soul; but there none of these. (Chrysostom on 1Cor 3401)
Love has never been “lost” or has it “diminished” within our Mother Church, lest the deceiver has prevailed and the promise of Christ was for naught. The greatest of gifts - love - has been preserved and protected by our mighty God, as Sacred Scripture has taught us.
Honestly, I have no subscription to Charisma Magazine - although, I did search for it via their web-site. I got it from this link though: unitypublishing.com/NewReligiousMovements/WhatSpirit1.htmlI would like a link to the article please. If this quote is legit and in the context it appears here than he is simply wrong. At the charismatic conferences I have gone to devotion to Mary is usually the third thing spoken of, 1st being giving your life to Christ and 2nd being filled with the holy spirit. We usually say a hail mary at the beginning of every prayer meeting we have.
Yes, I agree. PLUS, I do need all the intercession I can get, I am in DIRE need of everyone’s prayers, I assure you.I dropped out of the conversation because I could see that sometimes it comes to a point where there are 2 viewpoints and neither one is going to convince the other. But if we say, “I’ll pray for you” it doesn’t necessarily mean I’ll pray for you to see it MY way or I’m holier than you, I think sometimes in frustration we come to the point of knowing we need to give it all to the Lord in prayer and thinking of the other person that differs from you and remembering them as a brother and sister in Christ and praying for them.
I can only share what I know to be true for me. The Charismatic Renewal has change my life for the better, in fact I’ve grown so much closer to the Lord because of it and now closer to His Church. That can’t be a bad thing and I’m grateful to our wonderful Lord for this. This is my testimony. I know other have theirs too, I can only speak for me.
Blessings to all my brothers and sisters in Christ,
mlz
My comments were based on your statement “shouldn’t we be worried about the quality of the converts” coming from the Charismatic Renewal".No judgmental at all really. It’s not wrong to ask what type of converts certain movements bring in. Do these people become Cathoilcs faithful to the Church or do they become wolfs in sheeps clothing.
This is an interesting statement. Your saying I shouldn’t pay attention to what goes on in the Church or be cautious because to do so would be to have very little faith in Church leadership. You do realize that the leaders of the Church rely on the faithful to help them don’t you? When there is a liturgical abuse going on in a parish does God just beam the knowledge into the Bishops head?![]()
Do you feel that your spirituality or faith would have suffered if you had never been exposed to the CCR? Or, do you think that you might not have ever found your faith due to the Church having “lost” this form of spirituality?I am a Catholic Charismatic, since high school. Most of what I learned about the Catholic faith was nurtured around a Parish base Charismatic community. Deeper relationship with God, understanding the Holy Scriptures, being enthusiastic in worship, lively praises to God, inviting the Holy Spirit to touch us are some of the few things that I value the most.
If the CCR somehow gets reigned in, or if Rome orders a cease and desist, where would you be then? These are both possibilities with this movement, however unlikely.I cannot impose these wonderful things to people, but through countless experiences and miraculous events, I would not settle for less.
Should have been more clear. By Church I was referring more specifically to the people in general. The majority of Christians in the Church lost this understanding. It was not a loss of doctrine - indeed the teaching of the Magisterium on the Holy Spirit and the charismatic dimension of the faith has always been consistent. This teaching was less commonly understood, however. Even if it was lived out.So you would disagree with the dogmatic teaching of our Mother Church, with regards to her indefectibility, essential holiness, uniqueness as the “one only Church” and her full and unfailing possession of the means of sanctification?
How could your statement of:
…not contradict the infallible dogmatic teachings of her being indefectibe and unfailing? I do not see the errors promulgated by her that you are seeing. I do not see her having lost anything.
It’s not an either/or sort of thing at all. I pray the Rosary every day, and I pray in tongues everyday. I find great power in both. And this is a more traditional approach to the faith - as traditional as it gets. You know the first thing the Catholic Church ever did, if you want to be technical, was speak in tongues (see Acts 2). These things are not in opposition whatsoever.I think I like the bit more traditional approach to the faith. And my spirituality is not lacking much. I find great power in the Rosary.
I don’t know, depends on the event. At a prayer meeting, no, and I wouldn’t expect that to be the case. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t have a Marian element. The prayer meetings I’ve gone to all have hymns to the Blessed Mother.Is it the norm for individuals to pray the Rosary at the events? If not why?
Well, there’s certainly no dogma about it. There’s what’s said in the Catechism, and some church documents. But what’s really infallible would be what’s mentioned in the Scripture. There’s no official thing I’ve seen about “how to receive it”, and I don’t see any need for one. I can point you to good orthodox theologians (especially Ralph Martin) that speak about receiving it. There’s no specific “how to receive it” sort of deal. It differs depending on the person.Can you point me to any infallible teachings of the church in regards to speaking in tongues and the the way they are suppose to be received?
Can’t speak for him, but in my own life… my spiritual life would definitely have suffered. I was exposed to it over a year ago, and it dramatically changed by spiritual life and drastically helped me along. It was very necessary in my spiritual life.Do you feel that your spirituality or faith would have suffered if you had never been exposed to the CCR? Or, do you think that you might not have ever found your faith due to the Church having “lost” this form of spirituality? .
Then I would stick with Rome and trust in God’s will. But Rome will never do that, because they would be absolutely contradicting themselves. And they would also be attacking Church teaching. I don’t think you understand at all what the CCR actually is and what it’s saying.If the CCR somehow gets reigned in, or if Rome orders a cease and desist, where would you be then? These are both possibilities with this movement, however unlikely.
I shall go over this chapter tonight, and do my best to give it all I have.@ Irish_Polock: read 1 Corinthians 14.
Most definitely, going to mass on Sunday is one thing but that just it, a routine. It never goes deep. I have seen people who have the sincerest intentions to go to mass but practice different set of values after the Sunday service and to be honest I am one of them.Do you feel that your spirituality or faith would have suffered if you had never been exposed to the CCR? Or, do you think that you might not have ever found your faith due to the Church having “lost” this form of spirituality?
I am Cradle Catholic, and my learning of the Catholic faith would have suffered greatly without the CCR. My exposure to people who openly attacked the Catholic Church and the numerous scandals that barrage the Priesthood today would have damaged my spiritual beliefs and my staying within the church walls. Yes, I might end up being agnostic.If the CCR somehow gets reigned in, or if Rome orders a cease and desist, where would you be then? These are both possibilities with this movement, however unlikely.
To be fair though, the Apostles spoke in tongues as in different languages, in which all the Jewish Pilgrims in Jerusalem at the time could understand. All I know, is that which is similar to what thous “pentacostals” do is speak gibberish.It’s not an either/or sort of thing at all. I pray the Rosary every day, and I pray in tongues everyday. I find great power in both. And this is a more traditional approach to the faith - as traditional as it gets. You know the first thing the Catholic Church ever did, if you want to be technical, was speak in tongues (see Acts 2). These things are not in opposition whatsoever.
My own personal experience is that when there is a group speaking in tongues it is accompanied by a powerful movement of the Holy Spirit that I can sense/feel. I’m naturally a bit of a skeptic(in the sense that I think some people are too easily convinced of things like this) but I can’t really explain my experience away. Usually what I experience is very powerful internal prayer that takes on a life of its own as if directed by God, accompanied by overwhelming emotion. So I think the charism is real. If there is some psychological explanation I would like to know about it.I don’t mean to be rude, but I am very…suspicious, maybe?
Thats the word I was looking for “skeptic”.My own personal experience is that when there is a group speaking in tongues it is accompanied by a powerful movement of the Holy Spirit that I can sense/feel. I’m naturally a bit of a skeptic(in the sense that I think some people are too easily convinced of things like this) but I can’t really explain my experience away. Usually what I experience is very powerful internal prayer that takes on a life of its own as if directed by God, accompanied by overwhelming emotion. So I think the charism is real. If there is some psychological explanation I would like to know about it.