Charismatic Evangelical Church transforming christianity

  • Thread starter Thread starter JesusforMadrid
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m depressed about this, and I’m a Catholic.
I suppose what I am saying is that I am pleased they are Christian as opposed to Islamic extremist (which is also spreading worldwide). Having said that, I have great confidence that the Holy Spirit will eventually lead these protestant Christians to the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.

The Catholic Church! 👍
 
With respect, that isn’t little - and it’s not just dirty. It horrifies me.

I am trying to be charitable.
So you say that it is better that people move to a flawed church which does not have the fullness of truth or Christ in the Flesh there, because it feels good?
I do accept that.

Innovators have a harder time because they like to mess with the formula.
 
I personally have done short term catholic mission work in Bolivia and can tell you that the evangelical mission work I saw going on was appalling. They concentrated on the upper middle and wealthy class in evangelization in the apparent expectation that the peasant class would follow after. They had great success partly because the catholic church was finally preaching about the immorality of exploiting the poor for the concentrated gain of the rich. No wonder the rich folk left in droves for “works-free” evangelicalism.
I wont’ speak for Evangelical missionaries in Bolivia, but your anecdotal evidence is not representative of trends in South America as a whole. Indeed, the enormous irony of the Liberation Theology movement in South America is that while the Roman Catholic church preached liberation, Evangelical Churches have had most success in South America (and here in Spain) with the poorest segments of society (e.g. Chiapas, Mexico, now majority Evangelical; Guatemala, now majority Evangelical or the favellas of Brazil, where the Evangelical Church is growing by over 1 million per year). .

Sources are many but if you are interested, you might try Fire from Heaven by Harvey Cox of Harvard. amazon.com/Fire-Heaven-Pentecostal-Spirituality-Reshaping/dp/0306810492 Another good source is Tongues of Fire by David Martin.amazon.com/Tongues-Fire-Explosion-Protestantism-America/dp/0631189149/sr=1-1/qid=1167846556/ref=sr_1_1/105-1435201-7851618?ie=UTF8&s=books
 
the Evangelical Church
This phrase requires a bit of clarification. What do you mean by the evangelical church? Is there a denomination or association of churches called the Evangelical Church, or do you really mean to say evangelical churches, many of which are free of association with any denomination or other governing body.
 
The Economist magazine had an interesting article on the rise of Pentacostal/charismatic Christianity.

If you haven’t read it, here is the source:
economist.com/world/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=8401206

Forget theology for a minute: one thing that is heartening for Evangelicals, and must be depressing for Roman Catholics, is how the Evangelical Church is growing in Latin America, Africa and China, mostly the charismatic brand of Evangelical Christianity. China is now the second largest nation of practicing Christians (estimated 100 million), the large majority of whom are Evangelicals.
The problem is that one can’t forget theology. I have heard how this is happening in Latin America. Evangelical Christian groups go in and specifically target Catholic christians, oops, they would not call them Christians just Catholics. They teach them the “real” gospel (ie one can’t be Catholic and be a Real Christian) instead of lighting the fire under a Catholic Christian or actually going out and converting those who have never heard of Christ.

Billy Graham never tries to steal sheep. He encourages a Catholic Christian to be the best Catholic Christian they can be. One can help a lukewarm Catholic become an onfire Catholic Christian. These people are just tearing apart families with lies about the Catholic Church instead of spreading the truth of Christ, they spread lies and deciet about Christ’s Church.
 
I am trying to be charitable.
And you are succeeding. I am also being charitable, this is why I did not suggest anything about you - yet the position you adopt is horrific as far as I am concerned.

You just said above that you consider it better that people are in a flawed Church. You just said above that you consider it better people are in a heresy and having fun rather than in the truth and “being bored in a regular Mass.”

That is horrific. You are placing people’s enjoyment over and above the salvation of their eternal souls. You are placing individual pleasures and the avoidance of suffering (namely, being bored) over and above the very words of Christ. He founded ONE Church - NOT 40,000!

Christ Himself said that pain and suffering would come, that to suffer is part and parcel of being Christian. If these people find the Catholic Church less enjoyable than other heretical movements, then I think that is a small price to pay when a significant number of the Catholic Church have been tortured to death for the faith.

You say lukewarmedness is not the answer - I agree. And that is EXACTLY what I am seeing from you. You are saying that you are happy with the state of affairs, that you would rather have these people in a feel-good heresy rather than the truth that they don’t enjoy as much. You tell me that you consider these heresies are their spiritual home.

No, Man’s spiritual home is the Mass. It is what God died for.

Perhaps you don’t mean all this - perhaps there is some explanation for your willingness to place heresies on even vaguely the same level as truth. Perhaps I have misunderstood - if I have, could you explain again?
 
The problem is that one can’t forget theology. I have heard how this is happening in Latin America. Evangelical Christian groups go in and specifically target Catholic christians, oops, they would not call them Christians just Catholics. They teach them the “real” gospel (ie one can’t be Catholic and be a Real Christian) instead of lighting the fire under a Catholic Christian or actually going out and converting those who have never heard of Christ.
MariaG, this is exactly why this concerns me so much. My old evangelical church sent missionaries to, of all places, Sicily. One afternoon, the church asked various groups to set up tables to provide more information about their ministries, and I was the representative for children’s programs. My table was right next to the one for the missionaries to Sicily, and on the table, they had obviously Catholic artifacts, including rosaries, medals and crucifixes. The obvious implication was that these people needed to be ‘saved’ from this supposed ‘idolatry.’

I don’t mind so much when non-Catholics send missionaries, but to do so in obviously Catholic areas, where Catholics are targeted with often dishonest tactics (including the use of Catholic sacred art), with the implication that the Catholic Church isn’t even legitimately Christian, well, then I have a problem.
 
And, for the most part, God 🙂
Which, if you really believe, must be incredibly depressing.

Evangelicals, by contrast, are excited about what God is doing throughout the developing world and the impact this is having on developed countries such as the US and Spain. For example, the Ivy League universities are being re evangelised, the numbers of Christian groups at places like Harvard has burgeoned in recent years, due in large part to Evangelical Christian students from mostly Asian countries.

In Spain, Evangelicals from South America are re Christianising this otherwise mostly secular humanist country.

All very encouraging for Evangelicals.
 
Evangelicals, by contrast, are excited about what God is doing throughout the developing world and the impact this is having on developed countries such as the US and Spain. For example, the Ivy League universities are being re evangelised, the numbers of Christian groups at places like Harvard has burgeoned in recent years, due in large part to Evangelical Christian students from mostly Asian countries.

In Spain, Evangelicals from South America are re Christianising this otherwise mostly secular humanist country.

All very encouraging for Evangelicals.
Fine… very encouraging for evangelicals. But you started off the thread with a comment on how depressing this must be for Catholics. In other words, you set this up as a competition between two theological streams of Christianity, so you could gloat over our supposed misfortune in the face of your chosen stream’s supposed massive gains.

Now, you’ve also shifted your focus from the evangelization and conversion of Catholics to that of secular humanists. Why is that?
 
Fine… very encouraging for evangelicals. But you started off the thread with a comment on how depressing this must be for Catholics. In other words, you set this up as a competition between two theological streams of Christianity, so you could gloat over our supposed misfortune in the face of your chosen stream’s supposed massive gains.

Now, you’ve also shifted your focus from the evangelization and conversion of Catholics to that of secular humanists. Why is that?
I haven’t shifted my focus: the objective of evangelism (or evangelisation in Roman Catholic parlance) is to make disciples of Jesus Christ. Anytime a nominal Catholic, nominal Protestant, or secular humanist becomes a sincere follower of Jesus, it is reason for celebration, both on earth and in heaven. In South America, the growth of Evangelicalism has come at the expense of mostly nominal Catholics; on Ivy League campuses and here in Spain, it is at the expense of mostly secular humanists.

I suppose that some Catholics will view this as positive (as I stated, for example Ralph Martin or Father Cantalamessa).
 
Peterdiago,

I dont think its wise for anyone to leave the Bride of Christ. I never said it would be wise for anyone to do so. I am saying we cant chain them down by force to stay. I am saying that if they cant be satisfyed in the CCM and need another place that meets THEIR needs (not Jesus Christ’s - THEIRS) then, they really should leave. The movement is designed to edify the Church not be a stepping stone to some heretical non Catholic church.
I think you are misunderstanding me. Its not just them, its ANYONE who wants to leave. I dont like that they want to, but we know that to leave they never accepted the true authority of the Mother Church to begin with.
One would never leave if they understood the authority of the Catholic Church. If they cant understand that, then maybe they need to hit rock bottom to get back on track. Wheat and Chaff. Lets not forget that. We cant worry if we did what we could. Shake your sandals off and move on.
What I see as ultimately dangerous about all this is if one gets into this CCM without a firm foundation in the basics first, then they will not see why they are loosing something if they shop for a more “spirit filled” evangelical version of Charasmatic expression. And the CCM is very popular with the youth, who may or more likely does not have a firm foundation in the faith to start out with.
Do you still think I am wrong? I dont see it, but help me out here.
CCM= Catholic Charasmatic Movement
 
I haven’t shifted my focus: the objective of evangelism (or evangelisation in Roman Catholic parlance) is to make disciples of Jesus Christ. Anytime a nominal Catholic, nominal Protestant, or secular humanist becomes a sincere follower of Jesus, it is reason for celebration, both on earth and in heaven. In South America, the growth of Evangelicalism has come at the expense of mostly nominal Catholics; on Ivy League campuses and here in Spain, it is at the expense of mostly secular humanists.

I suppose that some Catholics will view this as positive (as I stated, for example Ralph Martin or Father Cantalamessa).
This is my entire point! This is what is dangerous about the CCM also.
They dabble in it in the “safe” CCM and then poof- they go off to Heretical groups that claim to be “sincere followers of Jesus”
Because there is more “Spirit” in those groups.
How sincere is it to be in Heresy?
 
Anytime a nominal Catholic, nominal Protestant, or secular humanist becomes a sincere follower of Jesus, it is reason for celebration, both on earth and in heaven.
But herein lies the problem: such evangelism efforts often target more than just nominal Catholics, considering even the serious ones to either not be Christian, or to be Christian in spite of their membership in the Catholic Church. That’s fundamentally dishonest.
 
This is my entire point! This is what is dangerous about the CCM also.
They dabble in it in the “safe” CCM and then poof- they go off to Heretical groups that claim to be “sincere followers of Jesus”
Because there is more “Spirit” in those groups.
How sincere is it to be in Heresy?
If you read Raymond Arroyo’s book, that’s why Mother Angelica left the movement.
 
He founded ONE Church - NOT 40,000!
There is only one Church, Christ’s. That it is manifested in different ways doesn’t take away from the unity of the Holy Spirit.

The fact is, competition is good. In Europe, where there are “monopoly” churches–i.e. Roman Catholic dominated countries such as Portugal, Italy and Spain; Anglican dominated countries such as England and Wales; Lutheran dominated countries such as the Scandinavian countries and Finland–there is also less spiritual life. In the US, where there probably are 40,000 denominations or more (if you consider every independent Evangelical church a denonomination), there is far greater church attendance. Indeed, in Protestant America, the Roman Church is much stronger (in terms of % of practicing Roman Catholics as a share of the total Roman Catholic population) than in Catholic Spain, Italy and Portugal.

The reason: more competition is good for Christianity, just as it is good for the marketplace. Churches who know that they have to serve their parishoners or they will go elsewhere generally do a better job of that service.

I wish we had 40,000 denominations in Spain. The Evangelical Church would be stronger and so would the Roman Catholic church.

Regardless, there is only one Christian Church and it is Christ’s, not the Pope’s.
 
There is only one Church, Christ’s. That it is manifested in different ways doesn’t take away from the unity of the Holy Spirit.
Regardless, there is only one Christian Church and it is Christ’s, not the Pope’s.
Does truth not matter? All of these different churches hold to widely divergent theologies on the most fundamental issues, including the issue of soteriology. Therefore, it is hard to say that all of these people formally belong to the same church, and that all of them believe the same truth. Either that, or holding to true doctrine doesn’t matter. Which is it?

Can truth manifest itself in contradictory ways?

We also believe that there is one Church, and that it belongs to Christ, not the Pope. Please consider reading up on what we believe about the papacy.
 
There is only one Church, Christ’s. That it is manifested in different ways doesn’t take away from the unity of the Holy Spirit.
Well, I dont wish for heretical groups tocontinue to multiply like a pandemic, as they already have since the Reformation but it is sadly the reality of life.
The bad fruit is rotting and it stinks to high heaven.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top