G
gt8952b
Guest
What a fantastic sentiment! Amen Brother.Even with no progress, we must always start anew, in obedience to Christ’s call for unity. I frankly don’t see how complacency in schism answers that call.
Jon
What a fantastic sentiment! Amen Brother.Even with no progress, we must always start anew, in obedience to Christ’s call for unity. I frankly don’t see how complacency in schism answers that call.
Jon
I am weary of approved private revelations. They are required for the faithful to believe. Church teaches does say they are worthy of belief. You got some Catholics here devote to the message of Fatima while some are more devoted to St. Faustina’s Divine Mercy Message that she received from Jesus Christ in the 1930s.Sorry I missed this yesterday. I’m talking about Church approved private revelations, along with prophecies from Saints, Blesseds, and Venerables. If you, or anybody is interested, you can read one book, “Trial, Tribulation, and Triumph” by Desmond Birch, which gives you all of the best info. And remember…
“Do not put out the Spirit’s fire; do not treat prophecies with contempt.” (1 Thessalonians 5:19-20)
We all should prepare for God’s Judgment that could be on the Last Judgement Day or on the moment of our death.“Now, brothers, about times and dates we do not need to write to you, for you know very well that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night. While people are saying, “Peace and safety,” destruction will come on them suddenly, as labor pains on a pregnant woman, and they will not escape. But you, brothers, are not in darkness so that this day should surprise you like a thief.” (1 Thessalonians 5:1-4)
The source of authority in the Catholic Church is God. He has revealed himself to us through his Divine Revelation in the person of Jesus Christ. I do not believe this is a flawed thinking. Before the Reformation, the doctrines of Sola Scriptura and Sola Fide is completely alien to the Early Church Fathers. Just read their memoirs.Here is the flaw in the thinking. The Catholics believe in everything being intrusted in the leadership of their church. The leaders say it, they believe it. Protestants (those who take the Bible seriously) make their decisions about faith from the Bible. The Bible is their authority, not the Pope. So, if the “leaders” of many (no all) of the protestant groups make nice with Rome, it doesn’t follow that they will have much company.
Catholics and some mainline protestant denominations look for unification, for conservative/fundamental/evangelicals it is the furthest thing from their minds.
If this were true, then Rome would not be in dialogue with various traditions since Vatican II. With all respect, yours is an artifical limit, not based on what is actually happening, or could happen.The Eastern Orthodox Churches will likely unite with their regional Churches, before considering re-uniting with the Holy See. Likewise, Protestant leaders will have reconcile with their fellow Protestant leaders before reuniting with either EO or the CC.
It’s speculation and the unification for Christian unity is a process. For example, I believe it was around the 19th Century or 18th Century that a small portion of the Eastern Orthodox reunited with Rome. These are uniate Churches.If this were true, then Rome would not be in dialogue with various traditions since Vatican II. With all respect, yours is an artifical limit, not based on what is actually happening, or could happen.
I would like clearly somethings in this thread. I have stated unification with Protestantism and Catholicism is unlikely and that Eastern Orthodox is likely to happen. However, by relying on ourselves, unity will not be possible. All Christians should pray for unity and God will answer the call.The likelihood of Lutherans coming into communion with Protestants that are not sacramental is far, far smaller than with Rome. The notion that all Protestants come from the same reformational roots is faulty. IOW, Lutherans were never joined with calvinists or Baptists, and the like in the first place, and our differences with some of them are greater than those we have with you. That said, there is movement between Lutherans and Anglicans - Porvoo and Call to Common Mission, etc.
I don’t get it.The Eastern Orthodox Churches will likely unite with their regional Churches, before considering re-uniting with the Holy See…
I think brother Manny could possibly be referring to the Eastern Catholic Churches? I personally see it happening the other way around.I don’t get it.
What regional churches?
I think brother Manny could possibly be referring to the Eastern Catholic Churches? I personally see it happening the other way around.
In Christ,
Andrew
Never.One thing that definitely needs to go is the invocation of Photius as a “saint”.
One thing that definitely needs to go is the invocation of Photius as a “saint”.
Our friend Material does not realize that Saint Photios is a pre-schism saint. In other words he belongs to the Roman Catholic church as much as to the Eastern Orthodox church.Never.
Unity at the expense of orthodox belief is a perverse unity.sigh. More past… what about the now? What about God? You folks were not alive when these people committed these acts. What about being the Church? What about forgiveness?
![]()
I’m not talking about giving up doctrine. I’m talking about forgiving past wrongs and atrocities and focusing on what can be expended besides doctrine for the sake of unity.Unity at the expense of orthodox belief is a perverse unity.
Hey, I forgive!sigh. More past… what about the now? What about God? You folks were not alive when these people committed these acts. What about being the Church? What about forgiveness?
![]()
This always seems to be the concern when it comes to dialogue: “we can’t give up doctrine”. I really don’t think any of our respective leaders intend to sell the farm for unity.I’m not talking about giving up doctrine. I’m talking about forgiving past wrongs and atrocities and focusing on what can be expended besides doctrine for the sake of unity.
Aye. :aok:This always seems to be the concern when it comes to dialogue: “we can’t give up doctrine”. I really don’t think any of our respective leaders intend to sell the farm for unity.
But I do think doctrine can be explained in new ways, through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, that permits convergence on doctrine.
Jon
Huh? Never heard of him. I’ll have to look into it to make sure you’ve not been told a one-sided story. Photius, however, was illegally elevated through caesaro-papism, unfortunately, and at one time was a heretic, if I remember correctly.Never.On your side, Josaphat Kuntsevych needs the title “Saint” removed from his name and replaced with his proper title, “The butcher of the Orthodox”…
What you will learn depends upon your sources, and I don’t think it is wise to restrict oneself entirely to Catholic or Orthodox sources.Huh? It appears that St. Jpsephat K. was butchered by Eastern Orthodox who took and axe to him and shot him… he was on the recieving end of the persecution.
Contrary to anything you may remember reading, Saint Photios was never a heretic. His theology was perfectly Orthodox, the same as that proclaimed by Saint John of Damascus (a Doctor of your church and completely Orthodox) and as that proclaimed by modern Holy Orthodoxy over one thousand years later.Huh? Never heard of him. I’ll have to look into it to make sure you’ve not been told a one-sided story. Photius, however, was illegally elevated through caesaro-papism, unfortunately, and at one time was a heretic, if I remember correctly.