A
A_Chaoidh said:
I think the last passage in the Beatitudes sums up what we our response should be:gilliam,
The righteous will never persecute the Church, at least not intentionally.
Looks like it will only get worse from here."Blessed are you when men revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account. 12 Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for so men persecuted the prophets who were before you.
Matthew 5:11-12
A_Chaoidh said:
Timidity said:American Christians for Equal Rights believes that God gave all humanity a free will. With that free will is the freedom to fall in love and marry, regardless of your sexual orientation.
Actually, their theology is almost flawless. God did, indeed, give humanity free will. And, indeed, with the free will is the freedom to sin just as they describe!
Of course there’s a consequence to that sin, but they seem to have left that part out.
Are you suggesting that all homosexuals, including women, rape children, knowingly spread AIDS and attempt suicide?All homosexuals need to be held accountable for their behaviour since they do possess free will, yet still commit anti-social acts (child rape, knowingly spread AIDS, attempts at suicide, etc.).
I did not know Rome used the word “gay”? When did they start that? Are heterosexuals “joyless”? The CCC speaks of authentic love, not false compassion that our society throws at them.Many of the posters on this thread must understand the words repect, compassion and sensitivity differently from they way that I do. If you find the behaviour of Gay activists provocative then do not be provoked respond with love and only love. Otherwise you are walking a different path from that of Our Lord who was spat upon
And RespectHomosexual activists are not only wrong, but guilty of scandal and leading others to a false understanding of love and what Christ expects of us. Yes, they should be treated with love, but true love.
Really? Why would someone want to be sensitive and compassionate to a person who is actively committing an agregious sin? Would I be respectful and compassionate to my local reigning Mafioso don? The active abortion provider? The notorious swinger? The open polygamist? The unrepentant imbezzler? The proud and defiant child-rapist?And Respect
And Compassion
And Sensitivity
Excellent retort! :clapping: :bowdown:Really? Why would someone want to be sensitive and compassionate to a person who is actively committing an agregious sin? Would I be respectful and compassionate to my local reigning Mafioso don? The active abortion provider? The notorious swinger? The open polygamist? The unrepentant imbezzler? The proud and defiant child-rapist?
Yes you should. Which bit of the Catechism do you most disagree withReally? Why would someone want to be sensitive and compassionate to a person who is actively committing an agregious sin? Would I be respectful and compassionate to my local reigning Mafioso don? The active abortion provider? The notorious swinger? The open polygamist? The unrepentant imbezzler? The proud and defiant child-rapist?
2357Yes you should. Which bit of the Catechism do you most disagree with
The Catechism says this~
scborromeo.org/ccc/p3s2c2a6.htm
2358 The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. This inclination, which is objectively disordered, constitutes for most of them a trial. **They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. **These persons are called to fulfill God’s will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord’s Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition.