R
rcwitness
Guest
Should we adhere to Canon Law?
Ok. Thanks for sharing.Well, in that case, I will bow out. My ‘opinion’ about canon law carries no weight and offers no clarity for others.
Who is asking for advice? It sounds to me like people want to discuss their opinions, which is done on CAF all the time.You are asking for advice , legal, Canonical advice from the forum. This is against CAF Rules.
This shows that 1153.1 is a formal Church separation (and can even be initiated without ecclesiastical authority), yet with terms, and definitely not referring to civil divorce, which although can be justified, requires “ecclesiastical authority”.Canon 1153.1 A spouse who occasions grave danger of soul or body to the other or to the children, or otherwise makes the common life unduly difficult, provides the other spouse with a reason to leave, either by a decree of the local Ordinary or, if there is danger in delay, even on his or her own authority.
>
> Canon 1153.2 In all cases, when the reason for separation ceases, the common conjugal life is to be restored, unless otherwise provided by ecclesiastical authority.
But this isn’t true. She doesn’t have to do anything of the sort. Please protect yourself and consult an attorney.What she must face, if she does that, is to tell me what priest has given her this permission or option.
If priests ignore this canon, then they might. Which I would take it to the Bishop. In that case.Also, I’ve been reading over your previous posts about your marriage. And I am entirely unconvinced that any priest would advise your wife to not divorce you. I think that you will have to take this on the chin.
That is untrue too. If your wife is not in Mortal Sin, she is entitled to the Eucharist.If she is to receive Holy Eucharist in a state of grace, she must. We are Married in the Lord, which means she is bound to the Church laws, and priests are also.