If we’re forbidden to be able to defend ourselves, we’ve been denied the right to defend ourselves.That’s quite true. We don’t know the hour of our death either. Yet from your observation does not flow the right you claim.
You made that up. I’ve not made that case at all, but others may have.your entire argument against me doing it is based on just in case I do something stupid or careless.
I apologise. Perhaps you didn’t, but several here have and many elsewhere do.You made that up. I’ve not made that case at all, but others may have.
Actually, a plain reading of the Catechism in no way proves you have a fundamental right to a particular weapon. In fact, you’ve not provided a single documented Church teaching to support your position.Your repeating that over and over doesn’t make it true. A plain reading of the Catechism proves you wrong.
Church teaching addresses this.How come?
Those watching aren’t missing the Mass. Which btw isn’t in the Upper Room anymore, either.
Thought for the month: He becomes guilty of rash judgment who, even tacitly, assumes as true, without sufficient foundation, the moral fault of a neighbor. - Catechism of the Catholic Church.Finally, with regard to the value of taking part in Mass via the communications media, those who hear or view these broadcasts should be aware that, under normal circumstances, they do not fulfil the obligation of attending Mass. Visual images can represent reality, but they do not actually reproduce it.(177) While it is most praiseworthy that the elderly and the sick participate in Sunday Mass through radio and television, the same cannot be said of those who think that such broadcasts dispense them from going to church and sharing in the eucharistic assembly in the living Church.
Millions of people carry guns, you are not being singled out. All gun owners want the right to carry.your entire argument against me exercising my right to be prepared against a violent criminal is based on just in case I do something stupid or careless.