Collapse of ‘Secular West’ good for the Church?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TevereNauta
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

TevereNauta

Guest
Let me throw out a few caveats before I start this thread. Firstly, it is a hypothetical question, not a ‘conspiracy theorists’ prophecy. Secondly, I have no solid research or statistics which as a whole support the initial question’s premise as imminent truth. Thirdly, all that said, given the current geo-political state of our world, I think this is a conversation worth having among practicing Catholics.

I am sure most all folks hereabouts have been following the recent political headlines, economic crises, and cultural decline of the Western World, but here’s a brief recap to set the meter of the initial question. In the West we have: cultural degeneracy to levels which perhaps exceed those of Sodom and Gomorrah, an economic system in the throws of a serious crisis to which governments’ solutions seem to find no fiscal remedy, an anti-Catholic media which disseminates its bias through channels political (Secularists) and religious (rise of ‘Evangelicals’), and arguably as a result of the formers negative birth rates in Europe and birth rates is serious decline in America.

All this considered, I ask: would the total collapse of the ‘Secular West’ be good for the Church. Emphatically, I say yes, it would. My point of reference for that assumption (having studied history extensively during my undergrad years) is the decline and fall of the Roman Empire.

During the latter years of the Roman Empire it was transitioning from an empire is the guise of a republic to an oppressive totalitarian state. Wars on the borders were frequent, and civil wars would become more frequent as the collapse continued and different imperial factions vied for control. Devaluation of the currency led to inflation, unsuccessful price fixing, greater hyperinflation, and finally deurbanization as people chose to flee to the woods when they could no longer pay the extreme taxes. Decadence and moral perversion among the rich were, to say the least, widespread. The poor were crushed by the state’s taxes (the seeds of Serfdom were sown) and, a markedly important fact, a great imbalance of trade existed between Rome and the East (China) as silver was exchanged by the former for finished products (silks and spices) from the latter.

Am I the only one who sees similarities here?

Importantly, during the maelstrom of Rome’s collapse, although the Catholic Church, the Church of Rome, was very much established and no longer persecuted, however it was competing with any number of rival churches and heresies, the Gnostics and Arians to name just a few, as well as a number of so-called mystery religions (e.g. Mithraism) and the leftovers of paganism. It is also worth mentioning that even after the reign of Constantine the Great there remained a sort of ‘cult of the emperor’ (one must see similarities here between them and modern politicians).

We speak of the 4th Century A.D… Fast forward five hundred years past Rome’s collapse and…

Europe is Catholic (Catholic in name in the West, Orthodox in the East but both still valid Churches). A firm Christian moral order has been imposed of a previously debauched society. The competing heresies and churches have been shelved or have destroyed themselves or been suppressed by the Church. Imperial authority has been replaced by Catholic authority: the Pope speaks and the secular governments listen (some it is true better than others)…and I know about the Byzantines and all that too, but for clarity’s sake we’ll speak of the West here. Christian knighthood is idealized, governments are local by necessity, and the Gospel is held to be the height of existence, as it should be. And yes, I know, living conditions were not ideal—those in the Medieval Ages did not bathe in creature comforts as we do—but spiritually speaking (in the main, of course there were scandals, there will always be scandals) Europe, the West, was healthy and Catholic.

My contention is that, should the overburdened—in every sense—Secular West fall, should the central authorities that are inextricably linked to hostility against the Church collapse, then the Church is in the perfect position, guided by God, to pick up the pieces and restore a Christian society. The competing so-called ‘churches’ of our ages, lacking a hierarchical structure and physical force to support it (Evangelicals et al) will fade away, their flocks to be reabsorbed into the one, true Flock of Christ.

It may not be a rich society as we know it, or pretty as we know it, but it will be Christian.

Thoughts?
 
You make some valid points. On a more micro level. If it makes people place their securities in God rather than money then it will be good for the church. All that being said it is a trial for which I am inadequately prepared. So let’s bombard heavens for the graces necessary to stay trustful in God’s providence amidst the choppy waters.
 
Good post.
I have pondered such ideas myself. It can be a tad frightening to think about. I also pray for the grace to trust and remain faithful to our Lord.
 
Indeed–I don’t believe this will be an enjoyable process at all to live through, and let us do bombard heaven with petitions for graces, by all means! And let us also pray for the grace to remain Faithful to our Lord…as we all know, before the collpase of Rome, there were great persecutions (are we living through them now, I wonder, or their beginning?) of Catholics. I must brush up on my Polybius!

In any case though I truly believe that just as the Lord raised a mighty Church from the ruins of Rome, and gave the Universal Church a whole epoch of history, in His Mercy He shall do the same for us.
 
It seems, and I will have to go back and study, that there are many Saint’s prophecies that tell of apostacy, war, destruction, etc. And then there will be a period of peace with a great Catholic Monarch, unity of Faith and the end of heresy. All before Antichrist comes.
 
Maybe.

The only problem is that the collapse of the Roman Empire was followed by a huge vacuum - the Germanic tribes had no strongman to consolidate control, and the Empire broke into smaller kingdoms. Additionally, the Germanic tribes were primarily pagan, and may were Christianized.

However now the issue is different. In Europe especially, an utter collapse in the West would lead to total chaos. I suspect that this collapse in the West would occur when Islam has sufficient numbers in Europe to make a grab for power. At that point,the fall could lead to catastrophic civil wars.
 
I do not think it will be good for the Church. History shows us that whenever a political/social system goes into decline and/or fails, there is another, waiting in the wings, ready to fill the vacuum.
With the collapse of international communism and the international decline of socialism, that leaves radical Islam. When you consider that 30 years ago Moslems were a very small minority in both Europe, Canada, and the US, and now they are a significant portion of the population, Beware!
Remember that they are more than just a religion. They are a social force, in which religious law over rides secular law; and, one of their basic teachings is that their religion is absolutely right and all unbelievers have no civil or religious rights.
 
I do not think it will be good for the Church. History shows us that whenever a political/social system goes into decline and/or fails, there is another, waiting in the wings, ready to fill the vacuum.
With the collapse of international communism and the international decline of socialism, that leaves radical Islam. When you consider that 30 years ago Moslems were a very small minority in both Europe, Canada, and the US, and now they are a significant portion of the population, Beware!
Remember that they are more than just a religion. They are a social force, in which religious law over rides secular law; and, one of their basic teachings is that their religion is absolutely right and all unbelievers have no civil or religious rights.
Beware indeed

youtube.com/watch?v=M27spDwM7zY
 
Those are excellent points re Islam, and I did fail to take that into account during my initial OP. However, I would assert that Islam does fit in to the larger portrait, as it were.

Islamic expansion in the Middle East circa 700 A.D. played a very significant role in denigrating remaining ‘imperial power’ vis-à-vis the Byzantines, which allowed in turn for a exponentially stronger Papacy and, indeed, for a cohesive Catholicism in the West. We ought not to forget Charles ‘the Hammer’ Martel, after all, one of the great heroes of the Medieval Church.

And Islam, and wars against it, were fairly integral in the formation of Spain, which (as we all know) later became one of the largest proselytizers in the history of the Church itself. Indeed, even the Crusades themselves were integral to forming the notion of Christendom, IMHO.

To wit, I believe that large numbers of Islamic migrants in Europe would not really negate my hypothetical hypothesis. I would argue that they would, in fact, be a cause of growth of the Church. But that is my $.02.
 
I do not think it will be good for the Church. History shows us that whenever a political/social system goes into decline and/or fails, there is another, waiting in the wings, ready to fill the vacuum.
With the collapse of international communism and the international decline of socialism, that leaves radical Islam. When you consider that 30 years ago Moslems were a very small minority in both Europe, Canada, and the US, and now they are a significant portion of the population, Beware!
Remember that they are more than just a religion. They are a social force, in which religious law over rides secular law; and, one of their basic teachings is that their religion is absolutely right and all unbelievers have no civil or religious rights.
Yeah I would have to agree that it would not be good for the church. While there are similarities in the world today with ancient Rome (all the world economies tied together, if the U.S. collapses it will have an affect on the entire world), there are some differences that will result in a different outcome that I think will not be good for the Church.
 
Interesting idea. Better crack open Warren Carroll’s History of Christendom. Personally I would prefer a Christianization of politics here in America with Europe, struggling to remain in existence with a below replacement birth rate, following our lead over the course of a generation or two…
 
In the meantime, perhaps we should work towards a more reasonable goal of legions of Catholic homeschooled young adults marching on the capitol, launching a coup d’etat and imposing a Catholic monarchy…
 
That ignores that the current crop of Westerners would not be as willing to fight in crusades as their great(*10)-grandfathers were.

The church, and the general society, have no eternal perspective anymore. I’d expect a large number to become Muslim to keep their heads on their bodies. In some cases, entire countries might go over.

Also, in the 1600s, Protestant and Catholic nations played each other off versus the Muslims for political advantage. There’s no reason that would not happen again.

It would not be good for the Church.

ICXC NIKA
 
Hah! I’m with you, but I suspect the current system of government might stringently object; probably with machine guns. And I dare say America was, until fairly recently, a ‘Christian’ society, though in the Protestant sense of the word, and a Protestant-Light sense at that. I believe the crux of the matter is that mixed-market capitalism with a nearly omnipresent (and carnally corrupt) media—such as we have—is fundamentally incompatible with what you and I would term a Christian Society, James.

As to the current crop of Westerners, I would agree, but I would disagree with your overall premise GEddie. You would be hard-pressed to find a more decadent, effete crop of men and ladies (especially in the upper-strata) than in Late Antique Rome…except, of course, presently. My initial assumption is that following the collapse—part and parcel—of the ‘Secular West’ and its axiology it would be the Church that, by the Grace of God, would rise into the vacuum and, sublimely, fill it as it did once before. Indeed, I’d argue that all that is good and noble in our society (what’s left of it) stands on the giant’s shoulders of Holy Mother Church.

If history is any indicator, what will occur is the formation of a new, vigorous class of Catholic statesmen, knights if you will, a new feudalism I suppose, that will congeal around the Church to defend the Faithful against forces just like the Muslims, and both they and the danger they represent have been accurately described. However, just as El Cid and Charles Martel were, though their faith, able to overcome their Islamic opposition I have not the slightest doubt that the Lord will raise people in our generation to do the same.

My point is really that we, the West, have been in a situation eerily similar to the one we finds ourselves in now: the end of Rome. Furthermore, that just as, almost impossibly, the Church rose like a phoenix from Rome’s ashes—indeed, sanctifying the former pagan city by means of St. Peter—so too will the Church outlast present institutions to create a new Age of Faith. And as I said it may not be rich, accessorized, pretty, or even safe, however it will be authentically Christian. And that, in the long run of eternity and salvation, is a good thing. Hence, it is good for the Church.
 
My point is really that we, the West, have been in a situation eerily similar to the one we finds ourselves in now: the end of Rome. Furthermore, that just as, almost impossibly, the Church rose like a phoenix from Rome’s ashes—indeed, sanctifying the former pagan city by means of St. Peter—so too will the Church outlast present institutions to create a new Age of Faith. And as I said it may not be rich, accessorized, pretty, or even safe, however it will be authentically Christian. And that, in the long run of eternity and salvation, is a good thing. Hence, it is good for the Church.
I do agree that, should the West survive (Lord have mercy!), it will require a revitalization of the Church. But the getting there will employ much blood, much chaos, and getting to the brink.

I’m not sure we’ll suffer the kind of complete and total anarchic collapse that the Roman Empire faced - unless that’s what you consider the inevitable civil wars between indigenous Europeans and Islamic minorities. But for the Church to assume its mantle of leadership again, it needs to reject this buonismo - this self-hatred and express desire to placate to Islam. It needs to regain confidence in itself.
 
Except if the Muslims had been there at the fall of Rome, the world would be Muslim today . The Muslims are here now.

ICXC NIKA.
 
Great points gentlemen!

Fabius, amen! I’d even argue there is a precedence, of sorts, for the abandonment vis-à-vis buonismo in the rejection of the early Popes to be ‘rubber-stampers’ of the Byzantine emperor. Instead of just bowing before imperial edicts from Constantinople the Popes slowly but surely had to go a bit martial. Indeed, during the so-called Dark Ages, more than one Pope had to take up the sword to defend the Cross, on one occasion at least from the Saracens—Muslims. My take on it would be when the Church needs another Gregory VII and/or Urban II not to worry…the Lord will give us this in good time. I digress. My point is precisely that a revitalization, of the type you did describe, did take place in the Church, but over centuries. It was not a straight road from Leo to Great to Gregory the Great to Gregory VII and Urban II…but it was a highway, nonetheless.

GEddie—not to split hairs, but, more or less, the Muslims were around at the tail end of Rome’s collapse (between the 6th and 8th centuries). Indeed they conquered all of North Africa, Sicily, the Middle East, and much of Spain too. It was in the Church’s struggle against Islam, in great part, that it became the efficient, international organization which undertook the Crusades. The main reason the West has been so craven towards Islam (as well as antagonistic toward the Church) is because of the secular governments awash in political correctness and hedonism. When they fall, and a revitalized Church rises (banking here on the mercy of God) I suspect Islam’s days in Europe and the West shall be numbered. But, again, we are speaking in terms of centuries.

Nota bene: If it hadn’t been for the Muslims, too, the Byzantine Empire would never have weakened, and the Papacy would not have had an opportunity to really assert itself.
 
Let me throw out a few caveats before I start this thread. Firstly, it is a hypothetical question, not a ‘conspiracy theorists’ prophecy. Secondly, I have no solid research or statistics which as a whole support the initial question’s premise as imminent truth. Thirdly, all that said, given the current geo-political state of our world, I think this is a conversation worth having among practicing Catholics.

I am sure most all folks hereabouts have been following the recent political headlines, economic crises, and cultural decline of the Western World, but here’s a brief recap to set the meter of the initial question. In the West we have: cultural degeneracy to levels which perhaps exceed those of Sodom and Gomorrah, an economic system in the throws of a serious crisis to which governments’ solutions seem to find no fiscal remedy, an anti-Catholic media which disseminates its bias through channels political (Secularists) and religious (rise of ‘Evangelicals’), and arguably as a result of the formers negative birth rates in Europe and birth rates is serious decline in America.

All this considered, I ask: would the total collapse of the ‘Secular West’ be good for the Church. Emphatically, I say yes, it would. My point of reference for that assumption (having studied history extensively during my undergrad years) is the decline and fall of the Roman Empire.

During the latter years of the Roman Empire it was transitioning from an empire is the guise of a republic to an oppressive totalitarian state. Wars on the borders were frequent, and civil wars would become more frequent as the collapse continued and different imperial factions vied for control. Devaluation of the currency led to inflation, unsuccessful price fixing, greater hyperinflation, and finally deurbanization as people chose to flee to the woods when they could no longer pay the extreme taxes. Decadence and moral perversion among the rich were, to say the least, widespread. The poor were crushed by the state’s taxes (the seeds of Serfdom were sown) and, a markedly important fact, a great imbalance of trade existed between Rome and the East (China) as silver was exchanged by the former for finished products (silks and spices) from the latter.

Am I the only one who sees similarities here?

Importantly, during the maelstrom of Rome’s collapse, although the Catholic Church, the Church of Rome, was very much established and no longer persecuted, however it was competing with any number of rival churches and heresies, the Gnostics and Arians to name just a few, as well as a number of so-called mystery religions (e.g. Mithraism) and the leftovers of paganism. It is also worth mentioning that even after the reign of Constantine the Great there remained a sort of ‘cult of the emperor’ (one must see similarities here between them and modern politicians).

We speak of the 4th Century A.D… Fast forward five hundred years past Rome’s collapse and…

Europe is Catholic (Catholic in name in the West, Orthodox in the East but both still valid Churches). A firm Christian moral order has been imposed of a previously debauched society. The competing heresies and churches have been shelved or have destroyed themselves or been suppressed by the Church. Imperial authority has been replaced by Catholic authority: the Pope speaks and the secular governments listen (some it is true better than others)…and I know about the Byzantines and all that too, but for clarity’s sake we’ll speak of the West here. Christian knighthood is idealized, governments are local by necessity, and the Gospel is held to be the height of existence, as it should be. And yes, I know, living conditions were not ideal—those in the Medieval Ages did not bathe in creature comforts as we do—but spiritually speaking (in the main, of course there were scandals, there will always be scandals) Europe, the West, was healthy and Catholic.

My contention is that, should the overburdened—in every sense—Secular West fall, should the central authorities that are inextricably linked to hostility against the Church collapse, then the Church is in the perfect position, guided by God, to pick up the pieces and restore a Christian society. The competing so-called ‘churches’ of our ages, lacking a hierarchical structure and physical force to support it (Evangelicals et al) will fade away, their flocks to be reabsorbed into the one, true Flock of Christ.

It may not be a rich society as we know it, or pretty as we know it, but it will be Christian.

Thoughts?
Just thought I’d say that Fr Z has a rather interesting piece on this subject on his blog today, you can read it here
 
My point is really that we, the West, have been in a situation eerily similar to the one we finds ourselves in now: the end of Rome. Furthermore, that just as, almost impossibly, the Church rose like a phoenix from Rome’s ashes—indeed, sanctifying the former pagan city by means of St. Peter—so too will the Church outlast present institutions to create a new Age of Faith. And as I said it may not be rich, accessorized, pretty, or even safe, however it will be authentically Christian. And that, in the long run of eternity and salvation, is a good thing. Hence, it is good for the Church.
I am convinced that the church will not only survive, but get stronger. However, I don’t think that will happen in the western world. Africa and parts of Asia will become the centres of Christendom, while the West will sink into conflict and paganism. I think we are there already, the way things are going.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top