R
Robbinson
Guest
Craig - I disagree with you - the commandments and statutes that Abraham followed did not include the Decalogue - because it was not given yet. the word used for law there in Hebrew is “Torah”. That word is used to refer to the laws of God, without distinction between the Decalogue and other laws. Once the mosaic law was established, this actually included 613 commandments (of which the Decalogue was a part) - but I don’t see you suggesting the Abrahm followed the 613 commandments (and he couldn’t - for the same reason, they were not given until Mt. Sinai). Before the mosaic covenant - these were whatever laws/commandments God gave to Abraham. There is nothing in scripture, or other history, to suggest that Abraham or others observed the “Sabbath commandment” prior to Sinai.By blessing and sanctifying the 7th day Sabbath/Saturday before sin entered this earth, it could not be a "shadow ", as all “shadow” came after sin entered this earth.
Abraham kept the 10 commandments including the Sabbath day…(Gen 26:5) BecauseH6118 thatH834 AbrahamH85 obeyedH8085 my voice,H6963 and keptH8104 my charge,H4931 my commandments,H4687 my statutes,H2708 and my laws.H8451
- Strongs concordance indicates that " my laws-H8451" is the Decalogue/10 commandments.
Since I don’t believe the Sabbath commandment even applied in Adam and Eve’s day, I’m not sure what you were getting at in your first point - but when the “commandment” to observe the Sabbath was given to Israel at Mt. Sinai - I do believe that was in fact a shadow of the day when we would rest in Yeshua.
The moral law was written in our hearts and still is and these are the moral principles embedded within the Decalogue - loving God will all our hearts and loving our neighbor as ourself. I honor the sabbath, like every day, now that I am in Christ - its not that the Sabbath ceased to be holy - its they “every day” is now our day of rest with Christ.The Catholic Encyclopedia states that the “laws” in the above verse is “Divine Law is that which is enacted by God and made known to man through revelation.”
Craig - and you have liberty to hold that belief. Personally, my faith does not turn on whether the earth is thousands (literal 24 hour day creation) or millions (long periods) of years old and, candidly, both are “literal” readings turning on the interpretation of days. I actually believe it “more likely” that each day is a long period of time. Science and Faith are not enemies - that co-exist and Genesis was not written as a “science book”. But reiterating - I think either interpretation is possible. As to evolution - similarly, I personally believe only in “micro” evolution (evolution with species) rather than Darwinian macro evolution - but if found out some day definitively that macro evolution occurred, again, my faith would not be affected because I would know that God choose that design to lead to the creation of the first man with a soul (Adam).Brian, I think we need to be very careful and know for sure if a day in Genesis is a 24 hour period, or a longer period of time. If it were a longer period of time, this could bring into questions that the earth could be billions of years old, thus bringing into question the evolution theory( of stupidity ). I strongly believe that evening and morning were/still are 24 hour periods of time. We see in Gen 1:4-5 that the Night was darkness and Day was light combining to make the first day.
I respect your “strong” belief in 24 hour periods of time - but you actually have no scriptural basis at all to support that strong belief (reiterating that you might be correct, or not, in any event) as scripture doesn’t tell us what the “day” meant in those verses and, as I pointed out, we have not “sun” until day 4 (I believe - without double checking the actual day).
Actually - Jesus told us expressly he came to “fulfill” the law (Matt 5:17) and he did - and while he said not one jot of the law would change until “all is fulfilled” - he sacrificial work was fulfilled at his death and resurrection. If you read Matt 5:17 as suggesting the law continues forever, then you should be following all of the “Torah” (all 613 commandments) (yet scripture, Galatians and Hebrew) makes it expressly clear this is not so. How do you reconcile that thinking (scripturally)?I agree with your statement. Israel was so legalistic and the Sabbath day was a burden to them. That is why Jesus came to correct Israel and exemplify the true meaning of the Sabbath day. That is why Jesus preached on the Sabbath. Also in (Joh 15:10) If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father’s commandments, and abide in his love.
I don’t believe Jesus would come to defend the Sabbath day of worship and then upon His death, without telling any of His disciples, that the Sabbath day was to be abolished, that a commandment was to be abolished/ or the meaning of the day was to be changed.
I believe the Sabbath day/Saturday is to not be changed to Sunday to honor the resurrection of Jesus, but as it was meant from the beginning of creation-Adam , to honor the God who created the earth and the skies and all that is in them. For if you remove the original meaning ( Exo. 20:8-11) , of the Sabbath day we do not know who our God is. The fourth commandment is the commandment that gives to us both the name and the title of the lawgiver. It is the only one of the commandments that shows whose authority the law is given.
Blessings,
Brian