Communion at Protestant churches

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg_Dent
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

Greg_Dent

Guest
I have often heard that Protestants should not receive holy Communion at Catholic Mass, and totaly agree that they should not…But is it permissable for us Catholics to participate in Protestant communion services???
 
I have often heard that Protestants should not receive holy Communion at Catholic Mass, and totaly agree that they should not…But is it permissable for us Catholics to participate in Protestant communion services???
No, we are not allowed to receive any Protestant communion for basically the same reasons they are not to receive ours.

The Eucharist is the sign of unity in the Church. Protestants are not in full communion with the Church, and their communion is not valid due to their lack of valid orders (priesthood).

When one receives the Eucharist at Mass one is declaring one’s unity with the teachings and mission of the Church. For a Catholic to receive Protestant communion is to deny that truth. In the same vein, it is hypocritical for a Protestant to receive the Eucharist while not believing/practicing the teachings of the Church, and may be dangerous to his soul.
 
My wife and went to an Assembly of God church many years ago. I never felt comfortable with their monthly communion service. They do not believe that the bread wine are the body and blood of Christ, but that they are following the commandment “do so in memory of me”. that said, before the distribution of bread and grape juice the minister would admonish the congregation not to partake unless their “heart was right with God”. He did that of course because of the scripture “Is not the bread we eat the body of our Lord? etc” But I asked the minister if this is just bread and juice what difference could it make?? I never got a satisfactory answer from him or any other Protestant minister.
Any way…I would have thought that it would be OK to participate in such a ceremony because the minister does not attempt to consecrate the bread and wine. Is this church law?
 
My wife and went to an Assembly of God church many years ago. I never felt comfortable with their monthly communion service. They do not believe that the bread wine are the body and blood of Christ, but that they are following the commandment “do so in memory of me”. that said, before the distribution of bread and grape juice the minister would admonish the congregation not to partake unless their “heart was right with God”. He did that of course because of the scripture “Is not the bread we eat the body of our Lord? etc” But I asked the minister if this is just bread and juice what difference could it make?? I never got a satisfactory answer from him or any other Protestant minister.
Any way…I would have thought that it would be OK to participate in such a ceremony because the minister does not attempt to consecrate the bread and wine. Is this church law?
I was a member of the Assemblies of God for about 20 years, so I know a little something about their beliefs and intentions. 🙂

While an Assemblies of God minister does not have valid orders nor does he claim to, he is still acting as a minister of the sacrament by conducting a communion service in which he is declaring the words of Christ which confected the bread and wine into His body and blood. By reciting those words an Assemblies of God minister does not mean what is meant by the Church.

The Assemblies of God is in open opposition to Church teaching here and makes no bones about it. For a Catholic to partake of such a communion would cause public scandal, as if the teachings of the Church mean nothing to him, when they are vitally important.

We do not receive communion to be sociable or kind or understanding of others but to follow Christ’s teaching that the Eucharist is what unifies us in Him, and is indeed what he said it is–His very body and blood, not merely grape juice and a cracker.
 
I was a member of the Assemblies of God for about 20 years, so I know a little something about their beliefs and intentions. 🙂

While an Assemblies of God minister does not have valid orders nor does he claim to, he is still acting as a minister of the sacrament by conducting a communion service in which he is declaring the words of Christ which confected the bread and wine into His body and blood. By reciting those words an Assemblies of God minister does not mean what is meant by the Church.

The Assemblies of God is in open opposition to Church teaching here and makes no bones about it. For a Catholic to partake of such a communion would cause public scandal, as if the teachings of the Church mean nothing to him, when they are vitally important.

We do not receive communion to be sociable or kind or understanding of others but to follow Christ’s teaching that the Eucharist is what unifies us in Him, and is indeed what he said it is–His very body and blood, not merely grape juice and a cracker.
Question: Is it against church law for a Catholic to participate? (you have demonstrated why it is undesireable quite well, but is it a sin to do so)
And if it is not too personal, why did you leave that church after 20 years?
 
Yes, it is. This article referencing canon law on the matter will help:

ewtn.com/expert/answers/intercommunion.htm
Thanks, so then if I read it the right way the Assemby of God communion is not valid because it falsely represents itself as a sacrament, wether or not the minister indends it so. And for me to partake would be me giving assent to it’s validity as a sacrament wether I recognize it for what it is or not.
 
If protestant communion is only ‘breaking bread and sharing wine’ to remember the last suppper, then it is not pretending to be communion in the same sense. It is somewhat like sharing a meal rather than taking the Body and Blood of Christ. I don’t see where the deception lies? Protestant churches are not claiming to provide a sacrament - it is only sharing food to remember so why is it wrong?
 
Thanks, so then if I read it the right way the Assemby of God communion is not valid because it falsely represents itself as a sacrament, wether or not the minister indends it so. And for me to partake would be me giving assent to it’s validity as a sacrament wether I recognize it for what it is or not.
Right, Greg; also, a Catholic’s participation would be a tacit example of indifferentism. And, of course, the falsity on the AofG’s part is not intended to be such since this is what they believe. They are in error, but out of ignorance, not malice.
 
I went to a Methodist/Episopical wedding last summer and we took part in their version of communion, which is open to all. That was on a Saturday afternoon. We are both Catholic, we took part because they were friends of my girlfriend. We still went to mass on Sunday morning (next day) ourselves. I view it as a sign of unity, does not hurt to go do it, but it is not a replacement.
 
If protestant communion is only ‘breaking bread and sharing wine’ to remember the last suppper, then it is not pretending to be communion in the same sense. It is somewhat like sharing a meal rather than taking the Body and Blood of Christ. I don’t see where the deception lies? Protestant churches are not claiming to provide a sacrament - it is only sharing food to remember so why is it wrong?
I would have thought that too, but the minister would admonish
the congregation not to partake unworthily. If it is just sharing bread and wine and remembering our Lord why put that condition on it?
 
If protestant communion is only ‘breaking bread and sharing wine’ to remember the last suppper, then it is not pretending to be communion in the same sense. It is somewhat like sharing a meal rather than taking the Body and Blood of Christ. I don’t see where the deception lies? Protestant churches are not claiming to provide a sacrament - it is only sharing food to remember so why is it wrong?
There is no pretense involved, but there is error in what they believe and present as communion. Therefore a Catholic may not participate in a deficient communion both because it would signify assent to this error (whether one realizes this signification or not) and, as I just said to Greg, to receive - especially knowing the Church’s teaching in this regard - would be the sin of indifferentism.
 
I went to a Methodist/Episopical wedding last summer and we took part in their version of communion, which is open to all. That was on a Saturday afternoon. We are both Catholic, we took part because they were friends of my girlfriend. We still went to mass on Sunday morning (next day) ourselves. I view it as a sign of unity, does not hurt to go do it, but it is not a replacement.
Whether one sees it is a replacement or not, the Church is quite clear that Catholics are not to participate in non-Catholic communions.
 
I used to be a non-catholic and went to various non-catholic churches and in all of the ones I went to it was considered like sharing a meal. Nothing about not taking it unworthily and it was definately not considered a sacrament in the churches I went to. In fact, in a couple of them it wasn’t even known as communion. The pastor would just say ‘Let’s break bread together’. The pastor would then read from th Bible the bit form the last supper so it was clear what they were remembering. But they did not believe that it was anything more than sharing a meal.
I would have thought that too, but the minister would admonish
the congregation not to partake unworthily. If it is just sharing bread and wine and remembering our Lord why put that condition on it?
 
Whether one sees it is a replacement or not, the Church is quite clear that Catholics are not to participate in non-Catholic communions.
The position has been well stated here. And, as a protestant pastor, I want to say that though I may disagree with your conclusions, I can actually respect it and do not wish to argue against it. (At least not at this time.😛 ) Yet I do remain curious about a few events in my person life with respect to communion in the Catholic church.

Given the teachings of the Catholic church, why would it be that on more than one occassion I have been invited to participate in the sharing of communion with Catholic priests? Why, when I was not even yet ordained, but merely a college student, did the bishop of the diocese actually issue a letter to the catholic student body at our university saying that it was permissible for them to participate in our campus-wide Christmas communion service, with the only caveat that we offer the elements in the name of the Holy Trinity, “Father, Son, and Holy Ghost”? Why, at my first church, was I approached by the local Catholic congregation to see if I was willing to continue the tradition of a joint Christmas Even communion service between the two congregations? (Which, btw, we did.)
 
Question: Is it against church law for a Catholic to participate? (you have demonstrated why it is undesireable quite well, but is it a sin to do so)
Yes, it is against Church law to participate in Protestant communion.
And if it is not too personal, why did you leave that church after 20 years?
So I won’t hijack this thread, here I my conversion story from This Rock Magazine: Up From Pentecostalism. It was published in 1995.

As for the issue of receiving at weddings and other family functions that others have raised, it sends the wrong message to others attending–that Catholics see Protestant communion as just as valid as that in the Church. People will take it that way even if we do not intend to give that message, therefore it is a cause for scandal, whether we know it or not, or intend it or not.

To let indifferentism win the day tells people that there is nothing special about the Eucharist, that it is only a “meal” like many Protestants say it is, instead of the main source of God’s grace given to us by Christ himself. Is that really what we want to leave our separated Protestant believing?

Do we really want to discourage any steps they may be taking towards reconciliation with the Church by giving them a false sense of security or let them go on believing it doesn’t matter?

Jesus established the Eucharist for good reason. It is not for us to dismiss that reason, knowingly or unknowingly, just to be sociable or more “ecumenical.” Truth cannot be compromised just to make people feel good, but we must explain in all charity why the Eucharist and their “meal” are not the same thing and why we cannot participate (if asked).
 
The position has been well stated here. And, as a protestant pastor, I want to say that though I may disagree with your conclusions, I can actually respect it and do not wish to argue against it. (At least not at this time.😛 ) Yet I do remain curious about a few events in my person life with respect to communion in the Catholic church.

Given the teachings of the Catholic church, why would it be that on more than one occassion I have been invited to participate in the sharing of communion with Catholic priests? Why, when I was not even yet ordained, but merely a college student, did the bishop of the diocese actually issue a letter to the catholic student body at our university saying that it was permissible for them to participate in our campus-wide Christmas communion service, with the only caveat that we offer the elements in the name of the Holy Trinity, “Father, Son, and Holy Ghost”? Why, at my first church, was I approached by the local Catholic congregation to see if I was willing to continue the tradition of a joint Christmas Even communion service between the two congregations? (Which, btw, we did.)
None of those things ought to have happened–they were abuses, especially that of the bishop! :eek:

By throwing the Eucharist open to non-Catholics, instead of being a source of enrichment for those souls, it was actually a potentially damaging thing to do. How many who received were in a state of grace to receive (without mortal sin)? How many came away, like you did, with the impression that the Eucharist is nothing more than a means to an ends instead of the very heart of Catholicism?

No. This principle cannot be compromised without serious scandal and real damage to souls and to true ecumenism, which does not ask a person to compromise his faith in order to “get along.” I say this in all charity–these events were totally wrong and should never have been permitted.
 
The position has been well stated here. And, as a protestant pastor, I want to say that though I may disagree with your conclusions, I can actually respect it and do not wish to argue against it. (At least not at this time.😛 ) Yet I do remain curious about a few events in my person life with respect to communion in the Catholic church.

Given the teachings of the Catholic church, why would it be that on more than one occassion I have been invited to participate in the sharing of communion with Catholic priests? Why, when I was not even yet ordained, but merely a college student, did the bishop of the diocese actually issue a letter to the catholic student body at our university saying that it was permissible for them to participate in our campus-wide Christmas communion service, with the only caveat that we offer the elements in the name of the Holy Trinity, “Father, Son, and Holy Ghost”? Why, at my first church, was I approached by the local Catholic congregation to see if I was willing to continue the tradition of a joint Christmas Even communion service between the two congregations? (Which, btw, we did.)
I have seen priests break the “rules” on more than one occasion. That is not to say it is wrong or unlawfull to participate in inter-faith celebrations. I was speaking specifically about the sacrament of Holy Communion, and the issues associated with the Protestant practices. It is good to worship with our Protestant brothers, we all can unite under the banner of Christ. A friend told me once “If you believe Jesus died for your sins and rose again from the dead you are my brother.” And so I call him my brother, and we can disagree on the particulars and still stand together under the banner of Christ. Yet I would not receive Communion I think at a Protestent church. I agree that it would be wrong, and sinful to do so.
 
Greg, I didn’t think you were saying that protestants and catholics can’t celebrate our common faith (though I suppose some would object to my use of that term even). I understood you were talking specifically about the sacrament of Holy Communion, the Eucharist, as was I in the examples I related. There are many, many more times, that I join with my Catholic brothers and sisters in ecumenical services. We have several every year. But those that I mentioned were in fact Communion services, and as I said, one with the written permission of the bishop – one who was usually very strict about such things, but for some reason agreed with us. Maybe the fact that it did NOT involve clergy, so that it really wasn’t a communion service from the Protestant point of view either, but was more of a “love feast” made the difference.
 
Greg, I didn’t think you were saying that protestants and catholics can’t celebrate our common faith (though I suppose some would object to my use of that term even). I understood you were talking specifically about the sacrament of Holy Communion, the Eucharist, as was I in the examples I related. There are many, many more times, that I join with my Catholic brothers and sisters in ecumenical services. We have several every year. But those that I mentioned were in fact Communion services, and as I said, one with the written permission of the bishop – one who was usually very strict about such things, but for some reason agreed with us. Maybe the fact that it did NOT involve clergy, so that it really wasn’t a communion service from the Protestant point of view either, but was more of a “love feast” made the difference.
My last comment was directed more toward our Protestant brother who was speaking about what some Bishops and Priests had done concerning sharing Communion. There is a priest in the town not far from here who does whatever he wishes concerning mass, and the Sacraments, and it is that kind of casual neglect of our laws and traditions that gives us a bad name among outsiders. I agree with you, and am in the process of reading about your conversion in the Rock…Mother Mary has a very special sweet spirit. Once you feel her persence you never forget it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top