M
MarysRoses
Guest
If there were no clergy involved, it could not have been the Eucharist and would not have been Holy Communion in the Catholic sense. It also could not have been a Sacrament in the Catholic sense. I also noticed the line about offering the elements in the name of the Trinity; as it reads, thats not part of the usual Eucharistic prayer, another reason I think this was something different. Its possible there is some misunderstanding there. I have witnessed interfaith ‘meals’ which were not Eucharist when I was in college. I didn’t really like them, because of the potential confusion for some. They would however, be a completely different matter than giving a general invitation for non-catholics to present themselves for Holy Communion.Greg, I didn’t think you were saying that protestants and catholics can’t celebrate our common faith (though I suppose some would object to my use of that term even). I understood you were talking specifically about the sacrament of Holy Communion, the Eucharist, as was I in the examples I related. There are many, many more times, that I join with my Catholic brothers and sisters in ecumenical services. We have several every year. But those that I mentioned were in fact Communion services, and as I said, one with the written permission of the bishop – one who was usually very strict about such things, but for some reason agreed with us. Maybe the fact that it did NOT involve clergy, so that it really wasn’t a communion service from the Protestant point of view either, but was more of a “love feast” made the difference.
MarysRoses