Communion on the tongue while kneeling

[laudamus_te]

I asked for documentation & not your opinion!

Well, being a member of a forum such as this you are going to get a lot of opinions, whether you want them or not. You should get used to it.

 

[Like]

You should be wary of that site as well, for it puts forth misinformation regarding the SSPX, claiming that it and it’s priests are “schismatic.” Absolutely untrue.

WOW! I can’t believe you stated this. I suggest you search CA for information on Catholic Culture! I’d like to see you run this by Karl, Steve Ray, Jimmy Akin, ect,ect.

 

[Like]

Well, being a member of a forum such as this you are going to get a lot of opinions, whether you want them or not. You should get used to it.

More spill and no true information.

 

[gorman64]

Please, again, is this hearsay or what?
I don’t mean to offend or doubt your sincerity, I just have not seen any of this in my personal life & these claims or statements are beginning to way heavy on my heart & soul.
Thank you & God bless

No, it’s not hearsay…it’s a fact…I am certain of it. You might take comfort in the fact that there is good reason to believe these masses were invalid.

Gorman

 

[BobP123]

No, it’s not hearsay…it’s a fact…I am certain of it. You might take comfort in the fact that there is good reason to believe these masses were invalid.

Gorman

Well, we have to assume they’re valid. Otherwise no sacrilege, no abuses, no worship.

 

[Jerry-Jet]

It seems like there would be less chance of problems if there were more intinction on the tongue.

Can any Catholic Church serve the Eucharist in this fashion?

 

[Walking_Home]

Quote:
Originally Posted by gorman64
Would you say it has resulted in more frequent desecration of the Eucharist (they used to find hosts stuck under the pews in my old NO parish) and a general weakening of the dogma of the real presence?

Please, who is “they”? I keep reading these claims of desecration of the Eucharist, but with little or no back of documents to support them.

Did you also know that heretics have instituted CIH to wreck the belief in the real presence?

Please, again, is this hearsay or what?
I don’t mean to offend or doubt your sincerity, I just have not seen any of this in my personal life & these claims or statements are beginning to way heavy on my heart & soul.
Thank you & God bless

---

There have been more threads like the following .When CA crashed last year a lot of data was lost.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=123749&highlight=pews

Quote=az 4 faith
The EHMC should have stopped the old man as soon as he/she saw that he was walking away with the Host. The old man would have been asked to give the Host to the EMHC, who would have then eaten the Host or given the Host to the priest at the altar to consume. EMHC’s are supposed to be trained to react immediately to those situations.

If the EMHC did not notice what had happened, and you did, then it would have been your responsibility to take note of the situation and ask the old man as soon as you could (discreetly) to surrender the Host or eat the Host. Under no circumstances should the old man have been allowed to leave the Church with the unconsumed Host.

I was never in favor of mandating that Holy Communion be placed on the tongue until I became an EHMC and saw how many times these kinds of situations happen and how they could be altogether avoided by placing the Host on the tongue instead of in the hand.

We have found old, dried up Hosts tucked into the cushions of pews and in the missal holders attached to the pews on more than one occasion in our parish church.

 

[J.J]

To “Daily Mass” - Re: Communion on tongue - “Vatican II” again —
Allow me to offer an alternative - In the Eastern Catholic Church, Eucharist is dispensed by the Priest only - on a golden spoon - both species - bread & wine. No “assistances”, no “Alter Girls” - just the Priest. If there are 1,000 recipients, it will simply take a little longer.

And by -the-way, the “Communion Rail” — it’s not just there to lean on — it’s what’s left of the Icon Screen all Churches at one time had.
And - the Priest will not just say “Bless you”, he will ask your name to personalize your receipt.

 

[gorman64]

Communicatio in sacris, i.e. active participation in non-Catholic religious functions, is on the whole unlawful, but it is not so intrinsically evil that, under given circumstances, it may not be excused. Thus friends and relatives may for good reasons accompany a funeral, be present at a marriage or a baptism, without causing scandal or lending support, to the non-Catholic rites, provided no active part be taken in them: their motive is friendship, or maybe courtesy, but it nowise implies approval of the rites. Non-Catholics are admitted to all Catholic services but not to the sacraments.

The above is from the CE…Communicatio in sacris was always a mortal sin because it expresses a communion with those outside the Church…which is not possible…and if a Catholic does in fact participate in the worship of these sects…they are suspect of heresy.

 

[laudamus_te]

It seems like there would be less chance of problems if there were more intinction on the tongue.

Can any Catholic Church serve the Eucharist in this fashion?

There is already a practice which would prevent most problems, it is Communion on the tongue. Intinction is not necessary.

 

[Like]

The above is from the CE…Communicatio in sacris was always a mortal sin because it expresses a communion with those outside the Church…which is not possible…and if a Catholic does in fact participate in the worship of these sects…they are suspect of heresy.

Amen! We see this asked almost daily in all these forums & a lot of them are not happy when they get the relies that they can’t.

 

[labernadette]

WOW! I can’t believe you stated this. I suggest you search CA for information on Catholic Culture! I’d like to see you run this by Karl, Steve Ray, Jimmy Akin, ect,ect.

Please, please tell me you are not referring to Karl Rahner. Don’t know of Steve Ray, but have heard nothing but negatives of Jimmy Akin…not a traditional Catholic to my knowledge. And of course, if you read and run with modernists you can’t be traditional.

 

[Cat]

Isn’t Jimmy Akin one of the apologists who runs this forum and is a founder of Catholic Answers?

Yes, he is. I just looked him up:

Catholic Answers’ Director of Apologetics and Evangelization, Jimmy Akin

labernadette, maybe I’m not getting some inside joke or something, but I don’t think it’s very polite to come onto this man’s forum and speak badly of your host. It’s kind of like–biting the hand that makes this Forum possible.

 

[labernadette]

Oops, I had no idea. An honest mistake to say what I did on my part. It was not intentional. Perhaps I don’t belong here.

 

[Like]

Please, please tell me you are not referring to Karl Rahner. Don’t know of Steve Ray, but have heard nothing but negatives of Jimmy Akin…not a traditional Catholic to my knowledge. And of course, if you read and run with modernists you can’t be traditional.

Well, you really **shot yourself in foot **with this one! Karl Keating is the president & founder of “this” Catholic Answers. Jimmy Akins is the lead Apologist on Catholic Answers and Steve Ray is another great Apologist associated with this company.
You should visit the home page, look around & lean something.

 

[Walking_Home]

Oops, I had no idea. An honest mistake to say what I did on my part. It was not intentional. Perhaps I don’t belong here.

---

Don’t fret over it. You made un-intentional mistake. You belong here --just as everyone else.

 

[Like]

Isn’t Jimmy Akin one of the apologists who runs this forum and is a founder of Catholic Answers?

Yes, he is. I just looked him up:

Catholic Answers’ Director of Apologetics and Evangelization, Jimmy Akin

** labernadette, maybe I’m not getting some inside joke or something, but I don’t think it’s very polite to come onto this man’s forum and speak badly of your host. It’s kind of like–biting the hand that makes this Forum possible.**

lol! Sorry, I shouldn’t gloat, but this is a good one! Thanks Cat!
(don it! now I got to go to confession)

Oops, I had no idea. An honest mistake to say what I did on my part. It was not intentional. Perhaps I don’t belong here.

Labernadette, you belong here, just do a little research.

 

[labernadette]

Labernadette, you belong here, just do a little research.

Well, thank you for that Like.

 

[labernadette]

---

Don’t fret over it. You made un-intentional mistake. You belong here --just as everyone else.

Thank you for your kindness…I have been travelling in very traditional circles!

 

[Cat]

labernadette, I certainly understand “oops.” I do it all the time, especially online.

Not sure what to say to your query about “not belonging here.”

We’re all guests of this wonderful Forum sponsored for free by Catholic Answers. I don’t think it’s polite to criticize our hosts. Of course, that’s just my opinion and my “manners.”

If you truly think that Jimmy Akin is someone quite objectionable, maybe you shouldn’t be hanging around his house.

Of course, I don’t think he has any objections to having critics, so hopefully you’ll feel comfortable sticking around the Forums and sharing your opinions.

I’m not posting this to be mean or unfriendly. I’m just suggesting that you remain true to your convictions to avoid inner turmoil. I’ve left several Protestant forums because I didn’t agree with those who sponsored them.