I
IgnatianPhilo
Guest
I wasn’t aware there was a need to worship anyone other than God, that is attributing something which belongs to God but not entities which are not God (Jesus). Again, don’t pretend to believe Jesus to be God, I know what you really mean on this point. I think the point in comparing Moses not knowing the trinity to John not knowing about manifestations is mistaken in that why would Jesus imply to his apostles that he was unique? He really wasn’t if Bahai religion is true, Jesus is just one of many prophets and manifestations who are needed for the time but they are not ultimately more important than the other. If Moses were as you argue a Son of God in the sense it is applied to Jesus, the Word as it were applied to Jesus, why withhold this information to give the wrong impression that Jesus in this regard was different from them? It would have been a clarification and a benefit to the Christian community to know this. instead all it did was allow them to fall into the gross error you accuse Christians of following today (Ie thinking Jesus is actually God, Yahweh). (I have to repeat myself because I know you will bring up the point, but don’t say Jesus is God when you know exactly what I mean. Bahai make a formal distinction between manifestations and God)Jesus only inspired John to write what was the necessary and prescribed measure for that age. The concept of a need to worship the Manifestation of God for the age (namely Jesus at that time) was divulged to man by Johns’s Gospel. The future Manifestations of God were also hinted at in the Gospel of John. They were the ones that will guide humanity to all Truth, as “another Comforter” into whom the “Spirit of Truth” will descend upon.
This is a bit like saying that if Moses believed in a Trinitarian God, He would have said so.
If Moses had believed that the Law is death, He would never have revealed a Law in the first place.
If Moses had believed in original sin, He would have said so and taught about the fall.
.
The fact that Moses didn’t know the trinity doesn’t mean he didn’t know God and nor was the knowledge given to him misleading as to who God was. God is One and there is one God to whom we must worship. That cannot be said of New Testament if Bahai religion is true. If Bahai religion is true the documents of the New testament and indeed the movement Christ started was misguided from the start. I cannot believe that, though bahai religion requires it.
I also agree the apostles guided humanity into all truth with the Holy Spirit. There was no need of further revelation, especially revelation which calls into question what Jesus and his apostles taught. I think you have to admit that John did not believe Moses and Abraham to be part of the Logos, this is how you seek to explain it looking back on to his text. The problem is as I laid out before, if John did not intend what you meant, why did Jesus not reveal this important truth to him? The Apostles were given the spirit afterall, they should have known the Word has many forms and John in writing the gospel as he did sets us up for a false understanding from the very start.