Sometimes I think the Holy Spirit prompts the priest…
He sure does.
Another witness I have had about priests literally acting in persona Christi at Confession and Spiritual Direction is that a few years ago, before my husband decided to convert into the Church, I was getting hopeless and wanting to proceed in my Faith without him, so I started trying to discern a ministry for myself in the parish. Well, when I brought that to my Spiritual director at the time (who was the pastor in the parish), he (again, to my surprise) told me not to get involved in any ministry for the Church yet, either in the parish or anywhere else! He told me my main ministry was at home, that I should be focusing on my husband, have Faith and trust in God. I did what he said, but I confess I felt like he was just overly simplifying the situation.
Well, we ended up going to another parish later for various reasons, and I started Spiritual Direction with an associate pastor in our new parish. After a while, my fleshly brain had the great idea “oh, I should ask him that same question again, he may be more interested than my old director”. Well, sure enough, he gave me the exact same answer, in almost the same exact words.
I went home and prayed that God increase my trust in Him during Spiritual Direction. I felt so bad for doubting, slap in the face.
And thank God, my husband is now coming to the Church at the Easter Vigil. I so look forward to April 11th!!!
Ah, sorry to be unclear with the word “canon”. The Council of Trent has what are called “canons” in it. There are the exposition type sections, and those are often followed by short, numbered statements (canons) with “anathema sit” (Latin) on the end of them. I meant the sixth session of Trent, and the canon number 23 which is in that session, which you can find at the same link I gave you.
Thank you, it’s my fault actually, I should have at least started reading the document. I still have the tab open here. I just read some of the anathema statements before and after canon 23.
What it means here is that one is not allowed to say what the canon says. The Anathema statements are confusing that way.
I see what you mean, they are understandable, but it is a backwards way of thinking, which is actually a pretty good brain exercise. The first ones I read went fine, and then I started getting dizzy and I’m like “woah, I’d better slow down”. It almost makes you want to apply DeMorgan’s law before proceeding. Kind of like brushing your teeth with the other hand, not automatic, but doable.
See, it is about avoiding venial sins and the special privilege that Our Lady had.
And that solved my doubt once and for all. It is possible for God, but does require the very unique special privilege that Our Lady had.
Trent is not the only council that has canons and the word anathema. For example, so does Vatican I. So, not all things called “canons” come from the CIC (Codex Iuris Canonici - canon law). Hope that makes sense for you.
Oh, and just to drive a person nuts, the word “canon” can apply to a certain type of cleric/person as well. :jrbirdman:
It makes total sense. Come to think about it, canon also has a meaning of “essential, unique, basic building block”. Like in set theory, file paths and XML, the “canonical form” is such that it is as small as possible, no repetition or duplication, yet complete and sufficient to uniquely identify what it represents.