R
Rich_Olszewski
Guest
Then take advantage of being a hypocrite. It benefits YOUR children.Nope. I am doing it to point out the hypocrisy of it all.
Then take advantage of being a hypocrite. It benefits YOUR children.Nope. I am doing it to point out the hypocrisy of it all.
And present injustices in the form of ethnically biased standardized testing and the underfunding of inner-city schools, plus a broken educational system where children from high tax sub-burbs have quality schools compared to the abyssmal state on inner-city education.To make up for past injustices to the people of a race denied opportunities because of their color. That’s precisely how I see it. You don’t? Fine.
You know, the “waaaah, boohooo, likfe isn’t fair” schtick is really getting old. Everyone has an excuse nowadays.And present injustices in the form of ethnically biased standardized testing and the underfunding of inner-city schools, plus a broken educational system where children from high tax sub-burbs have quality schools compared to the abyssmal state on inner-city education.
Inequality in American education is the modern Civil Rights issue with minorities on the short end of the stick- as usual.
I certainly don’t oppose it.What is it they don’t understand.? Do you believe that people should be given preference in college admissions because of the color of their skin?
\And present injustices in the form of ethnically biased standardized testing and the underfunding of inner-city schools, plus a broken educational system where children from high tax sub-burbs have quality schools compared to the abyssmal state on inner-city education.
Inequality in American education is the modern Civil Rights issue with minorities on the short end of the stick- as usual.
If that’s your perception. . . . . sorry about that.You know, the “waaaah, boohooo, likfe isn’t fair” schtick is really getting old. Everyone has an excuse nowadays.
Yeah. The points Ringil just made don’t exist any more. They disapeared with Brown vs Bd of Ed.You know, the “waaaah, boohooo, likfe isn’t fair” schtick is really getting old. Everyone has an excuse nowadays.
Nope, in 2008 when we elected a brown skinned man to president. Everything’s fixed now.Yeah. The points Ringil just made don’t exist any more. They disapeared with Brown vs Bd of Ed.
So, I’m not opposed to taking the unequalness of the playing field into account. Frankly, I think people who object so strongly to it are either operating out of a misguided desire for “fairness” that overlooks inequities that exist in the system currently or just have had their pwecious widdle feewings hurt that they got wait-listed for that prestitious school.
Tough on them. They ought to grow up and join the real world.
It is total hypocrisy and most people know it. They just don’t care or accept it or think its justified.Is there no hypocrisy in “leveling the playing field” so to speak, by “un-leveling the playing field”?
Just becuase you dont mind being discriminated against doesnt mean it should be legal. Either discrinination based on the color of ones skin is legal or it is not.If that’s your perception. . . . . sorry about that.
Bottom line is that the playing field isn’t level. Independent research tells us this and affirmative action policies have done the US a great deal of good- even assisting towering minority Conservative firgures by their own telling.
I am “white” (whatever white is) as are my children. Why aren’t I conserned about a minority being hired over me? Why am I not conserned that my daughter won’t be treated fairly in this nation due to her skin color?
The playing field itself is busted.Is there no hypocrisy in “leveling the playing field” so to speak, by “un-leveling the playing field”?
So, keep beating that dead horse until it wins the race?The playing field itself is busted.
Affirmative action is equally dumb.Clearly, they don’t know how affirmative action works. There was a time when doing so in the name of civil rights made sense because of the great inequality. Of course, it is less needed today because of the acceptance of diversity. However, there aren’t many women in executive roles, so there still may be a need for affirmative action
With that said, this bake sale is dumb
One thing is certain. You no more find my position convincing than I do yours.So, keep beating that dead horse until it wins the race?
Ringil didn’t say that, and sure as heck doesn’t think that.Nope, in 2008 when we elected a brown skinned man to president. Everything’s fixed now.
I think you’re missing the point. There are inequities in the system. There is social policy in place that takes those inequalities into consideration for purposes of college admission.Is there no hypocrisy in “leveling the playing field” so to speak, by “un-leveling the playing field”?
What a normative statement. Care to back it up?Affirmative action is equally dumb.