R
rev_kevin
Guest
The idea of drinking any blood, let alone human blood, was repugnant to the religious leaders because the law forbade it (Leviticus 17:10-11). Jesus was not talking about literal blood. He was saying that his life had to become their own, but they could not accept this concept. The apostel Paul later used the body and blood inagery in talking about Communion. (Corinthians 11:23-26)In John 6, there is no reason to assume that Jesus is speaking figuratively. Even when some of his followers question this teaching, what is His response? He did not say “This is what I really mean” He said “My flesh is true food and my blood is true drink” Even when He says we are to eat His flesh, the Greek indicates a very visceral image. What does He say to Peter? He does not explain to Peter, James and John the imagery of his metaphor? NO! He says “Will you also leave me?” If this was a metaphor, Jesus would have explained it clearly, as the Lord’s Supper is CENTRAL to the Christian Faith.
Why did Jesus’ words cause many of his followers to desert him? 1) They may have realized that he wasn’t going to be the conquering Messiah-King they expected. 2) He refused to give in to their self-centered requests. 3) He emphasized faith, not deeds. 4) His teachings were difficult to understand, and some of his words were offensive.