T
ThinkingSapien
Guest
Or diversion. Dismissal may come after diversion though.I’m no expert at this, but this sounds like a “dismissal” to me, not a “deferral”.
https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-22000-pretrial-diversion-program
Or diversion. Dismissal may come after diversion though.I’m no expert at this, but this sounds like a “dismissal” to me, not a “deferral”.
Yeah, right? At least let’s see some investigative reporting on this.These Nigerian brothers who keep insisting Jussie paid them . . . need to be arrested. Pronto!
We can’t have them going aroung making “false” charges against Jussie like that.
And if they DID beat Jussie, then assault and battery along with hate crimes would be a good start for jailing them. And WHO could have HIRED them to carry out this beating?
We KNOW it couldn’t be Jussie (because he maintains his innocence and the Government attorney just ignored, er, I mean dismissed a multitude of felonies against Jussie so we KNOW Jussie is “all good”).
See the Nigerian brothers at 26 seconds into the video here . . . .
I’d like to see that happen too.At least let’s see some investigative reporting on this.
Is it a crime to pay someone to strike you?then assault and battery along with hate crimes
Didn’t you read? He maintains his story.Is it a crime to pay someone to strike you?
Doesn’t answer my question.Didn’t you read? He maintains his story.
.Is it a crime to pay someone to strike you?
That’s because your “question” is irrelevant.Doesn’t answer my question.
Except Trump wasn’t formally charged with anything, nor is there any substantial evidence of wrongdoing. Therefore, there is nothing for Trump to be exonerated from.Replace Smollett with Trump. It is still a true statement.
And Mueller threatening and pressuring all kinds of witnesses with process crimes is far more obstructing and tampering with judicial proceedings than anything Trump could even dream of.If you threaten or bribe or otherwise tamper with a juror hearing your case, you are clearly guilty of obstruction whether or not you were guilty of the crime for which you are being tried.
What about innocent until evidence of guilt, rather than the presumption of guilt so that no Stone (pun intended) is left unturned or unpunished until the “evidence” is produced, composed or manufactured?Theo520:![]()
Given the open question on obstruction in the Mueller report - as we know it so far - the came could be same appears to be true on this case. Moreover, at the level of “wrong doing” this idea probably also applies to collusion.evidence was clearly available of wrong doing but didn’t feel it should be pursued as a prosecution.
As George Conway put it:
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
That’s part of a rule for some legal processes. When it comes to public opinion though the speculation that someone may have done something is itself condemning. That’s not an endorsement of such condemnation, but recognition of it.What about innocent until evidence of guilt
His story wasn’t evaluated as true by law enforcement. If they are operating under the belief that there request to receive a beating it doesn’t look like there is any crime to be charged against the brothers. There would need to be a crime before elevating the charges to a hate crime as you suggested earlier.He maintains his story.
(He says he DIDN’T pay someone to beat him.)
Muller’s “threats” are against people who lie to investigators. That is justice, not obstruction.And Mueller threatening and pressuring all kinds of witnesses with process crimes is far more obstructing and tampering with judicial proceedings than anything Trump could even dream of.
TS has this right. He is innocent of q crime until proven guilty fo one. That is hardly the same as being :Innocent".What about innocent until evidence of guilt,
Draw your own conclusions on how ThinkingSapien is thinking here.His story wasn’t evaluated as true by law enforcement. If they are operating under the belief that there request to receive a beating it doesn’t look like there is any crime to be charged against the brothers. There would need to be a crime before elevating the charges to a hate crime as you suggested earlier.
Or ask. Asking may also work.Draw your own conclusions on how ThinkingSapien is thinking here.