J
josie_L
Guest
It’s sacrilegious, and Protestants re-baptize too!Just speaking for myself, and no other posters, I have no interest in calling the practice of Orthodox Churches “sacrilegious”.
It’s sacrilegious, and Protestants re-baptize too!Just speaking for myself, and no other posters, I have no interest in calling the practice of Orthodox Churches “sacrilegious”.
Thought you still must be Fairly sure you’ve at least one of our emails to reply to whenever you have a spare while. In the mean time, have you any Coptic Catholic contacts in Australia? They don’t seem to reply when contacted via their webpage.I am particularly busy right now
And here we were thinking you were Marduk!To be frank,
Amen! The education of the people in the pews, and the shared experience of loving one another, are the keys to unity.I am as likely to defend Coptic Orthodoxy (and Oriental Orthodoxy) as I am to defend Catholicism. My goal is always to inculcate understanding, for it is only through the spiritual fruit of understanding that true unity can be accomplished.
Just speaking for myself, and no other posters, I have no interest in calling the practice of Orthodox Churches “sacrilegious”.
I’m going to assume that you already read my earlier post (quoted above), so I guess there’s no need for me to say anything to that statement.It’s sacrilegious,
I’ll let protestants speak for themselves (assuming there are any on this thread).and Protestants re-baptize too!
I agree with this observation.Forgive me for saying this, my Catholic brethren, but I have to get this off my chest.
When someone comes to Catholicism from Orthodoxy, the statement “welcome home” can come off as patronizing. I know that is not your intent, however.
Blessings,
Marduk
Although I said earlier that “Welcome home” (as opposed to simply “Welcome” I mean – “Welcome back” would of course be worse) could be a bit triumphalistic, at the same time I think there’s a danger of getting too picky about wording.What would you suggest saying instead? “Welcome”? Or, “Welcome back”?
Good post, but I feel it’s important to chime in that we Catholics are very capable of sympathizing with the feelings of the Oriental Orthodox on this matter, since we feel just the same way whenever the reverse situation occurs.Maybe I can offer my two cents worth on this issue…
I admire the OP desire for unity amongst the Oriental Orthodox (OO) and the CC (Catholic Church), it is something I hope for in the future. However, the OP must realise that Unity must begin with the self, the family, the community and the Church. Rejecting his Coptic Orthodox community of which he became an adopted child can be interpreted as an uncharitable act and infact an act of disunity of the self. The Unity of the Church Visible is important, but the Unity of the Church Invisible is important as well!. The Coptic Church is still very much part of the Universal Catholic Church!
If the OP feels that the Catholic Church is right about certain things like contraception, then he should just not use contraception! this would not be an issue in the COC. Or if the OP feels that Rome has primacy, this would not be an issue in the COC. Please correct me if i’m wrong!
In the East, we do not have the individualistic attitude that is prevalent in the West. We believe that Unity can only be achieved with legitimacy of the whole community (this does not necessarily mean a simple majority). An example of this is how Patriarch Jarweh took a Catholic Oath of office before being consecrated as Patriarch of Antioch by other bishops in the Synod. By doing this he gained legitimacy, taking with him a large portion of believers to be in union with Rome.
The illegimate actions of the Bishop of Mosul hiring Kurds to ransack the Patriarchate created disunity in the Syriac Church.
It is the devil that creates disunity!
Just some food for thought!.
What shall we say then?Although I said earlier that “Welcome home” (as opposed to simply “Welcome” I mean – “Welcome back” would of course be worse) could be a bit triumphalistic, at the same time I think there’s a danger of getting too picky about wording.
I was thinking exactly this! It is incredible that so many of the Eastern Catholic were hesitant to enter into such celebration for what the OP is considering. OP all I can say is I will pray for you.Forgive me for saying this, my Catholic brethren, but I have to get this off my chest.
When someone comes to Catholicism from Orthodoxy, the statement “welcome home” can come off as patronizing. I know that is not your intent, however.
Blessings,
Marduk
Thankyou. I greately need it.I was thinking exactly this! It is incredible that so many of the Eastern Catholic were hesitant to enter into such celebration for what the OP is considering. OP all I can say is I will pray for you.
I was asked to be re-baptized by an evangelical (not over the internet or some such, but face to face). Suffice it to say, I was taken aback by this comment because it suggests that he didn’t view me as a Christian.I’ll let protestants speak for themselves (assuming there are any on this thread).
Most evangelicals view us as non-christian pagans, and the ones that view us as christians only view us as barely christian. They believe we are semi-pagan with perverted teachings against the scriptures.I was asked to be re-baptized by an evangelical (not over the internet or some such, but face to face). Suffice it to say, I was taken aback by this comment because it suggests that he didn’t view me as a Christian.
When you have a new topic to discuss, please look for existing threads on the same topic and post to them. If there is not an existing thread on the topic, please start a new one in the appropriate forum instead of inserting an off-topic post into another thread. You may post a link to the new discussion in the original thread.I was wondering whether I am the first to make this journey, or whether others here have done also. Please remember me at divine liturgy, and in your intercessions to the All-Holy Theotokos.
I am an Antiochian Orthodox Christian who chose to enter into full Communion with Rome. If you would like to, you can read some of the reasons why I chose to do so here: forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=11547551&postcount=2Hello all,
Im a coptic orthodox christian who is very passionate about reunification. Due to recent stands by the coptic synod it has, with great sorrow, pushed me into the confirmation of a need to come into reunification without my beloved Church. The coptic church has started the practise of rebaptising catholics who convert. This goes against everything I believe in.
As well, I believe the nicene creed, where we say and in one holy catholic church. This had made me realiaw the true need of the see of st peter, as around him church unity resides. Otherwise it turns into factional war.
I was wondering whether I am the first to make this journey, or whether others here have done also. Please remember me at divine liturgy, and in your intercessions to the All-Holy Theotokos.
In Christ Jesus,
Coptsoldier
Just to be clear: Is the Coptic Orthodox Church re-baptizing Roman Catholics who convert because they believe the Catholic baptism (“In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit”) to be invalid?The coptic church has started the practise of rebaptising catholics who convert.
The Catholic Church does not “rebaptize” those who have “been validly baptized but chose to do this as a public declaration of their acceptance of and into the Roman Catholic faith.” If this was actually done, it was a grave error.Just to be clear: Is the Coptic Orthodox Church re-baptizing Roman Catholics who convert because they believe the Catholic baptism (“In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit”) to be invalid?
The parish I used to attend frequently had converts from a variety of faiths. At Easter, the only ones who were baptized were the people who had never been baptized with the Trinitarian formula; those who, while baptized in their former churches, could not provide proof that they were baptized in the Trinitarian formula (aka “conditional baptism”); and those who had been validly baptized but chose to do this as a public declaration of their acceptance of and into the Roman Catholic faith.
BTW, I was shocked to learn of the number of purportedly Christian, Bible-believing congregations out there who do not use the Trinitarian formula (i.e., baptizing only in the name of Jesus), even though Scripture EXPLICITLY says what formula to use.
That would be Gregory I, in his letter to his Greek Alexandrian counterpart Eulogius, where he writes:The Patriarchate was called one of the sees of St. Peter, along with Rome and Antioch, by a Roman Pope no less if memory serves correct. By that admission, you would already be in communion with St. Peter.
Your most sweet Holiness has spoken much in your letter to me about the chair of Saint Peter, Prince of the apostles, saying that he himself now sits on it in the persons of his successors…Wherefore though there are many apostles, yet with regard to the principality itself the See of the Prince of the apostles alone has grown strong in authority, which in three places is the See of one…He himself established the See in which, though he was to leave it, he sat for seven years. Since then it is the See of one, and one See, over which by Divine authority three bishops now preside, whatever good I hear of you, this I impute to myself.
The Coptic Orthodox Church has always followed the practice of re-baptising anyone who was baptised by a group which did not have a correct view of the Godhead, even if the formula of the baptism was valid. Unfortunately, Coptic view of the filioque clause is that it changes who God is, thus giving the impression that Catholics worship a different deity. (Note: I realise that this is a mistake on the part of the Copts due to their misunderstanding of the filioque.)Just to be clear: Is the Coptic Orthodox Church re-baptizing Roman Catholics who convert because they believe the Catholic baptism (“In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit”) to be invalid?