T
ThomasMT
Guest
Have a good evening, Captain )
I understand your concern about stability. This however is a far more current matter than in the past; and given the grounds you have laid out, you may well never be married as you may not achieve those goals until your 40’s or 50’s - at which point the possibility and/or likelihood of having children may well be gone.To me financially stable is no debt (credit card, student loans), gainfully employed, and a decent sized nest egg. I should also add I’m pretty old now so I really need catch up on those things.
A credit card properly used is not against Christianity in and of itself. Properly used, you stay within the bounds of objectively prudent spending and pay it off each month. If you cannot pay it off, that either should indicate a charge which was necessary/critical at the moment and will be paid off as rapidly as possible, or spending that is outside objectively prudent spending.refuse to get a credit card as it is compound interest
And he responded…ThomasMT:
Fundamentals like “being attracted to members of the opposite sex?” Don’t see how that’s a bad thing.Absolutely. The fundamentals of human nature are unavoidable otherwise.
You might want to pay attention and orient yourself with the context of a given conversation before commenting.
One I don’t see as admirable in and of itself.undermine the OP’s admirable objective
What ideology? The “ideology” that men and women should have more faith-based spaces to interact with one another?with his/her own ideology.
And whose fault is that - the parish’s?I don’t know anyone at my parish
Am I not allowed to prod and see why those priorities exist?The ideology that dismisses the OP’s priorites in favor of your own.
I cannot be everywhere. More than just I will need to serve the needs of young Catholics in this way.If you feel so strongly about such a void, you could look into starting your own group instead of being discouraging.
If one wishes to avoid any carnal interaction at all, why not invite the angels? Young Catholics don’t need more sex segregation, they need less. The Church can still feel very prude at times when it comes to acknowledging the romantic desires of young people, but also the capacity and great benefit of forming inter-sexual friendships.yes there is a potential for carnal elements of human nature to manifest when members of the opposite sex interact. No, it’s not a bad thing, but it can certainly hinder a range of objectives, including the one that the OP seems to have in mind. Again, it’s just human nature.
Again, your modernistic ideological position is evident and seems, to me, to take us beyond the scope of this thread. Why I was content to just call it good without a never ending back and forth.Young Catholics don’t need more sex segregation, they need less. The Church can still feel very prude at times when it comes to acknowledging the romantic desires of young people, but also the capacity and great benefit of forming inter-sexual friendships.
What is modernist about anything I’m saying?Again, your modernistic ideological position is evident and seems, to me, to take us beyond the scope of this thread.
Or you were afraid to actually address your ideas which may be incorrect.Why I was content to just call it good without a never ending back and forth.
Wow. I don’t know how you read between the lines like that.Right. A depraved sex-obsessed ideology advocating for even more sexual interaction than our perverse modern era celebrates is the correct idea
The saints all advocated that men and women constantly be separate, or only be allowed limited interaction? If that is the case then, quite frankly, I don’t trust their judgement.I guess you even have the saints beat, not a single one of which I am aware of that would endorse your position.