C
Cathoholic
Guest
LeafByNiggle . . .
Covfefe.
Nobody has “eschew(ed) expert advice and instead seek to figure out the medical truth yourself”.
I asked for scientific data.
You couldn’t provide any. (Because of course there ISN’T ANY.)
By now many of us know, there is none.
There are absolutely no studies that suggest masks are an effective safeguard regarding corona virus in society with respect to randomized prospective studies.
None.
And all the deflection in the world is not going to make these studies appear.
Welcome to your own paradigm Leaf.
None.
I will remember this the next time you are critical of hydroxychloroquine usage ona future thread.The fact that you eschew expert advice and instead seek to figure out the medical truth yourself based on your ability (or my ability, for that matter) to properly assess the field of research involved and interpret said research is the mistake.
Covfefe.
Nobody has “eschew(ed) expert advice and instead seek to figure out the medical truth yourself”.
I asked for scientific data.
You couldn’t provide any. (Because of course there ISN’T ANY.)
By now many of us know, there is none.
There are absolutely no studies that suggest masks are an effective safeguard regarding corona virus in society with respect to randomized prospective studies.
None.
And all the deflection in the world is not going to make these studies appear.
Welcome to your own paradigm Leaf.
None.The chances of an armchair observer realizing some technical truth that is simultaneously missed by the whole team of experts … .
Absolutely none. Decisions based upon NO DATA. Political decisions.Is that clear now?
None.
Last edited: