H
Holly3278
Guest
Maybe they could buy the property, tear down the existing building, and build a new but traditional looking church there! 
I had the same thought myself. There are some modern churches or chapels that use traditional architecture.Maybe they could buy the property, tear down the existing building, and build a new but traditional looking church there!![]()
http://pipedreams.publicradio.org/g...arden-grove_crystal-cathedral_interior_lg.jpgVery true, but it would take a lot of work to make this look like a church, and more importantly, do we even know what a church is supposed to look like anymore?
That pool? It could become the new baptismal font!http://pipedreams.publicradio.org/g...arden-grove_crystal-cathedral_interior_lg.jpg
Actually, if you look at the interior, it looks like it wouldnāt take a whole lot of redesign to bring the interior into line for a Catholic Mass. The pews are oriented very similarly to a standard Catholic church (although the pool down the center aisle has to go). The organ placement isnāt really a problem. In fact, itās supposed to be a superb organ, so thatās actually a plus. The choir location up front could be moved to the rear balcony, and everything in front of that could be removed and replaced with a standard altar and lectern setup. Large Stations of the Cross could be placed on the wall areas just underneath the balconies. The large floor-to-ceiling windows on either side of the front of the church could be replaced with stained glass. A beautiful crucifix could be hung in the gap just above the front organ pipes.
Actually, I thought thatās what it was, since many Protestants practice Baptism by immersionā¦That pool? It could become the new baptismal font!![]()
As to CatholicGuy22 seminarian on the Crystal Cathedral not being a suitable place to have the Holy Mass. Just to remind him, the mass is said around the world in small churches, large cathedrals, on ships, battlefields, homes, etc. It is not the venue or place that makes the Holy Mass holy. I personally have an enormous respect for the Diocese of Orange to even consider this move. It speaks volumes of their flexibility, vision, ecumenicalism, and business sense to envision this Protestant national and international landmark as their new home. It has the potential to put the Roman Catholic Church of Orange on a national stage at a stunningly beautiful landmark cathedral for all to see, worship at and enjoy; a strategic marketing move of immeasurable value at a time when the Church has seen declining membership year after year. It would be a bold move by the diocese but, nevertheless, a move true to the words of Jesus Christ by letting our ālight shine before othersā.
Hmmmā¦Thereās also something to be said for the possibility of evangelism here. The Crystal Cathedral, whatever you might think of it, IS a landmark and up until now, one of the most famous Protestant churches in America. A large number of Protestant tourists would likely continue to come visit the cathedral, and I would imagine that this would put a good number of people inside a Catholic Church (where they could inquire about the faith) for the very first time. It would also be difficult to overlook the symbolism of Catholicism taking control of an important Protestant landmark.
The very term āGothicā was originally derogatory, From Wikipedia:Gothic cathedrals were once new. No doubt someone protested them as a waste of resources, or far too elaborate, or even garish. But they are some of the very valuable gems on the diadem of Christendom. Why not this and ones like it?
āGothic architectureā does not imply the architecture of the historical Goths. It has a much wider application. The term originated as a pejorative description. It came to be used as early as the 1530s by Giorgio Vasari to describe culture that was considered rude and barbaric. At the time in which Vasari was writing, Italy had experienced a century of building in the Classical architectural vocabulary revived in the Renaissance and seen as the finite evidence of a new Golden Age of learning and refinement.
The Renaissance had then overtaken Europe, overturning a system of culture that, prior to the advent of printing, was almost entirely focused on the Church and was perceived, in retrospect, as a period of ignorance and superstition. Hence, FranƧois Rabelais, also of the 16th century, imagines an inscription over the door of his Utopian Abbey of ThĆ©lĆØme, āHere enter no hypocrites, bigotsā¦ā slipping in a slighting reference to āGotzā and āOstrogotz.ā
In English 17th-century usage, āGothā was an equivalent of āvandalā, a savage despoiler with a Germanic heritage, and so came to be applied to the architectural styles of northern Europe from before the revival of classical types of architecture.
According to a 19th-century correspondent in the London Journal Notes and Queries:
On 21 July 1710, the AcadĆ©mie dāArchitecture met in Paris, and among the subjects they discussed, the assembled company noted the new fashions of bowed and cusped arches on chimneypieces being employed āto finish the top of their openings. The Company disapproved of several of these new manners, which are defective and which belong for the most part to the Gothic.āThere can be no doubt that the term āGothicā as applied to pointed styles of ecclesiastical architecture was used at first contemptuously, and in derision, by those who were ambitious to imitate and revive the Grecian orders of architecture, after the revival of classical literature. Authorities such as Christopher Wren lent their aid in deprecating the old mediƦval style, which they termed Gothic, as synonymous with everything that was barbarous and rude.
Nope. Garden Grove is just a few miles from the ocean (never gets too hot outside in the first place), the glass is mostly reflective and several windows automatically open on a thermostat to let the breeze through whenever it does start to warm up inside.Iām pretty sure its centrally air conditioned othewise itād be like an inferno inside.
Yebbut theyād have to remove rows of seats to make room for the kneelers in the pew in front of your own pew.Maybe⦠but itās likely that kneelers could be retrofitted onto the existing pews.
Hereās something I wrote when I came home from such a Mass ā a Saturday night Vigil Mass - where Iād been struck with a line from Fatherās homily that night. He was talking about ādying to self.āOn the āplus sideā ā while sitting listening to that Massās reading or Fatherās homily, Iāll look at the clear glass window ā 2 feet high and 16 feet wide ā above and just to the side of the ambo. There ā the tree limbs (which may or not be moving in the breeze ā which may or may not have any leaves ā with if having leaves they may be green OR turning color) and sky (with or without clouds moving across the sky) ā
well, Iāve found that scene to be inspirational. God speaking in the Word being read or the Word as proclaimed in Fatherās homily. God just being THERE. Me focusing much better on whatās going on with me⦠with the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.
Iām still not entirely sure thatās true⦠are Catholic pews really further apart than Protestant ones? I mean, most kneelers are retractable. As long as your legs can fit under the pew, I doubt the pew distance would have to be changed.Yebbut theyād have to remove rows of seats to make room for the kneelers in the pew in front of your own pew.
I doubt it. Iāve had difficulty navigating plenty of Catholic pews even before the kneelers are put down.Iām still not entirely sure thatās true⦠are Catholic pews really further apart than Protestant ones? I mean, most kneelers are retractable. As long as your legs can fit under the pew, I doubt the pew distance would have to be changed.
I suppose thatās an interesting question to investigate further though!