I never cease to be surprised by what I see on CAF. I never thought that a thread on the Dark Night of the Soul would be a place for too much argument or differences of opinion, as this has already been defined by the spiritual masters. We need to leave well enough alone. If something is not broken, let’s not attempt to fix it. Just try to understand it.
The term the Dark Night of the Soul is actually a Shakespearean term. It’s found in many of his sonnets to describe the feeling that comes when one perceives that he has lost a great love or hungers for a great love that feels unattainable.
Mystics cannot always put their experiences into words that do them justice. They have to borrow from what’s around them. They may be mystics, but their language abilities are still their own. Those with good language skills can explain things much more clearly than those who don’t hav those skills.
Writers like Julian of Norwich, Augustine, Francisco de Osuna, Catherine of Siena, Bonaventure. Aquinas, Teresa of Avila, John of the Cross and Catherine of Genoa spoke of these exeriences long before the term Dark Night of the Soul was coined by the Carmelite mystics. John and Teresa had discussed these events in spiritual direction, letters and confession for many years before their works appeared on the market.
Other mystics experienced the Dark Night of the Soul, but were unable to explain it as fluently for lack of language skills, such as Anthony of the Desert, Bl. Giles of Assisi, Rita of Cassia, Joseph Cupertino, John of God, and Mother Teresa of Calcutta. Their writings are simple, but very profound.
One look at the private writings of Mother Teresa and one can identify the elements of the Dark Night of the Soul. In fact she calls it by name. She writes in her letters about being in darkness and yet being sure that God is there, even when she can’t feel him or speak about him as she would like.
She often spoke of becoming the Patron Saint of Darkness when she got to Heaven, because she was so familiar with it. There is the remarkable dimension of the Dark Night of the Soul. The person is keenly aware of the darkness. They experience the pain and the anguish of trying to experience consolation and not finding it. However, the person never loses sight of God’s activity in their lives. Mother always felt that God had done this to her, because this is what he wanted and what she deserved. She didn’t deserve spiritual consolations. She was willing to live without them, even thoug it caused her sorrow. She was willing to live according to his will.
What she didn’t realize was the joy and peace that she radiated to others. It’s like the story of the emperor who was naked. Everyone could see his nakedness except him. In the case of the mystics who go through the Dark Night of the Soul others can see Christ in them and through them, but themselves. Because of the absence of consolations they perceive themselves to be the smallest creatures in God’s mind. Nonetheless, they know that are in God’s mind. There is no spiritual despair, even if there is an emotional sense of frustration.
A good mystical work that exemplifies this juxtaposition between darkness and light is the Cloud of Unknowing, whose author is unknown. It was written long before the Carmelite Doctors wrote their theology on the Dark Night and much of what is in this work is found in the writings of the Carmelite Doctors, but with more more linguistic refinement through the use of allegories, metaphors, symbols and personal reflection.
I would encourage anyone who wants to read about the Dark Night in its raw form to read the Cloud of Unknowing. A word of warning, it can be very frightening if you begin to project yourself into it. It was meant to be read to attain knowledge and wisdom, not to analyze oneselve.
Fraternally,
JR
