D
Della
Guest
Yes. If the government had merely led the way of non-discrimination, such as outlawing discrimination in government run institutions, that would have been fine, I agree. But by passing laws concerning who private businesses may serve, it became overly intrusive and set the stage for every perverse group in the country to be granted protected status.The problem with the Civil Rights movement was that it didn’t stop at ending government discrimination whether that be discriminatory rules by the state or forced segregation. It allowed the government to abrogate a most intimate right, freedom of association. The government asserted the authority to delve into every human interaction. The same principles of this movement will now be used to force Christians to promote SSM. If the principle was right in the early Civil Rights movement it is right now. It was however a huge and costly mistake.