E
EmperorNapoleon
Guest
There is an entire website dedicated to this. I suggest you google it.Give me one example of Fox deliberately altering tapes and news. (Dan Rather anyone)?
There is an entire website dedicated to this. I suggest you google it.Give me one example of Fox deliberately altering tapes and news. (Dan Rather anyone)?
Would that be Huffington?There is an entire website dedicated to this. I suggest you google it.
Nope, and the site provides videoWould that be Huffington?![]()
I don’t get your point.True. All you have to do is read the comments section of the newspaper any time black crime is reported.
It depends on how folks want to discuss the issue if their comments are called racist. I, for example, am white and have been on coalitions of white folks, black folks and everything in-between and spoken extensively of crime in the minority community.
No prejudiced comments or racist stereotypes are made. We would actually talk about the real reasons and practical solutions.
It depends on how the subject is discussed. Some folks, not implying you, can’t discuss the issues facing minorities without making biting, thinly veiled racist, overt racist, or steriotypical commentary.
True. All you have to do is read the comments section of the newspaper any time black crime is reported.
I meant I agreed with you on the racism of some folks. All you have to do is look at the comments section in newspapers.I don’t get your point.
My post related to individuals and experts in the fields of Psychology, Counseling, Public Policy and Social Work who are concerned about the violence in some inner-city minority communities.
I was talking about media.
Ah, I got you.I meant I agreed with you on the racism of some folks. All you have to do is look at the comments section in newspapers.![]()
Who brought up Fox News? Please stay on topic.Not like FOX news which is “fair and balanced.”![]()
Journalism is supposed to report the facts. Facts=truth. When a purported journalism puts out slander that is not facts and has no place in journalism.I hope it gets thrown out.
Not because MSNBC burnished the report, but because a lawsuit against a news station, whether you like them or not, will have an impact on freedom of speech.
Everyone who doesn’t like was is reported will sue, regardless of whether they think they can win or not, but just for the sake of harassing the news agency.
Jim
Someone brought up MSNBC so I brought up FOX.Who brought up Fox News? Please stay on topic.
Perhaps you should examine why you feel the need to do that.Someone brought up MSNBC so I brought up FOX.![]()
For every action there is an equal and oposite reaction.Perhaps you should examine why you feel the need to do that.
So there can be no unity and nothing gets done because we are all opposed to each other.For every action there is an equal and oposite reaction.
Yeah it is and if not for freedom of speech for everyone, the deception would not have been discovered and those responsible dealt with.How about for altering the tape? Is that freedom of speech?
No it isn’t good that a person was slandered and suffered as a consequence.And what about slandering a person? Is that alright with you? And you don’t think Zimmerman has been harassed since that? I don’t know what really happened and neither does anyone else on this forum. I think it is unwise to state one’s opinion as if it were fact until the facts are known. And how long do we let the MSM, whichever side it supports, misreport the facts in order to gain ground for their particular point of view.
Where is it? I want to see where FOX has altered a video or voice-over.Nope, and the site provides video![]()
Would this be an oxymoron?Just look it up on the internet. Don’t read propaganda, read facts.
No one worships free speech as otherwise pranksters could go to movie theatres and yell fire or go to the airport and in panic stricken voice yell that there is a bomb for obvious reasons.No it isn’t good that a person was slandered and suffered as a consequence.
But it’s the price we pay for having freedom of speech on issues like this.
Remember, it doesn’t take just the government to stifle free speech, but lawyers, political organizations and can do just as well and in some cases it’s even worse.
Look how well political correctness has been working.
Jim
I don’t get it. How was he behaving oddly? The boy was simply talking on the phone while heading home.No, not simply because the boy was black, but because he was behaving oddly, which is why Zimmerman called the police in the first place. This was a racially mixed neighborhood; he wouldn’t have called for every young black man he saw or he’d have been on the phone all the time!*
There had been several burglaries in the neighborhood over the previous year. One occurred while the occupant was in her home with her small child, and Zimmerman helped her out afterwards. He told her to go to his wife if she felt nervous.
And a couple of years before, Zimmerman had spent hours informing people and working for an investigation of a case in which the white son of a police officer was not arrested after beating a black homeless man.
What do you mean?In the future you might be wise to say something factual rather than sinful rash judgment.
Of course, we can discuss the issue openly. Right, so if in certain areas or in a certain area, some people belonging to a particular racial group are notorious of doing something wrong, then what? I mean, what’s the conclusion then?Zimmerman and his wife tutored disadvanted children, some of whom were black. It is an unfortunate fact that a disproportionate number of crimes are commited by black youths. Black on black crime is appalling. Until we can openly address this issue without being called racist, the problem will continue.
NopesHave you ever heard of the “no snitch” rule in black communities?