J
Jump4Joy
Guest
Guilt is good. I don’t know how I feel about shame though. I think it can be debilitating
Say what? Are you equating blindness with different types of sexual orientation???No, not at all. I don’t think blind people should have all the same opportunities as seeing people (e.g. driving), but I’m not a hater of blind people.
Sounds like they are not interested in listening and understanding. I encourage listening and understanding, but I oppose gay marriage. Sorry, but I do. And I’m bisexual, by the way.We have several people at my work who oppose “liberal ideas”; they actively believe one of my colleagues shouldn’t be allowed to marry her partner, believe another is an abomination because she was assigned a different sex at birth, and believe most of us are deviants. They’ve never been called haters. Our group largely just seem disappointed that they’re so caught up in wanting other folks not to have the same rights as them. They don’t seem like happy people.
Ever hear of listening with a sympathetic ear? I recommend it.Say what? Are you equating blindness with different types of sexual orientation???
They were, and abusing drugs to try to numb the pain. It was a bad situation. But now they’ve worked through it and part of that was through the LGBT community. It’s not been a bandage, it’s been the removal of the shame that was killing them.I understand that but sometimes shame is good. Shame drove me out of that life. Were your friends suicidal? If so then, yes, I see how identifying with others who struggle with this may have been temporary bandage solution.
I think it can and does. It is a secular term with secular pressures. I do agree that the person doing the stereotyping has a problem, but so does the target!But whatever the answer to the question, merely calling oneself “gay” does not put anyone in a box
Clearly.I would have thought that a person who calls a bisexual person “homosexual” just doesn’t understand the meaning of the words.![]()
That is probably not likely to happen…Perhaps the ones with conflicting views can create a different thread if they wish to sort out their disagreements.
I agree, but Christians need to find our “pride” in our relationship with Christ, not what the world gives.For many “pride” in this sense is more about acceptance, a lack of shame. The LGBT+ movement has helped friends of mine who were close to destroying themselves.
No, but this is one of the ways we are pressured by the world to be squeezed into a mold. You see, “opportunity” or what Catholics call “license”, is, in this case, taking the freedom God has given us and twisted it into selfish outcomes. For us, marriage is a sacrament that can only occur with proper matter. It is not an “opportunity”.Well, if they feel that someone who is LGBTQ shouldn’t have the same opportunities as straight people, then that does kind of make them a bigot and hater, doesn’t it?
You and the other poster took my post out of context. We were discussing opportunities in the workplace. That was all.No, but this is one of the ways we are pressured by the world to be squeezed into a mold. You see, “opportunity” or what Catholics call “license”, is, in this case, taking the freedom God has given us and twisted it into selfish outcomes. For us, marriage is a sacrament that can only occur with proper matter. It is not an “opportunity”.
They may be. But the time someone questioned their view they got upset and claimed they were being called bigots.Alex337:![]()
Sounds like they are not interested in listening and understanding. I encourage listening and understanding, but I oppose gay marriage. Sorry, but I do. And I’m bisexual, by the way.We have several people at my work who oppose “liberal ideas”; they actively believe one of my colleagues shouldn’t be allowed to marry her partner, believe another is an abomination because she was assigned a different sex at birth, and believe most of us are deviants. They’ve never been called haters. Our group largely just seem disappointed that they’re so caught up in wanting other folks not to have the same rights as them. They don’t seem like happy people.
To be clear, given the pathetic reality that is marriage in America these days, I’m not altogether politically opposed to gay marriage. I just think that there is a natural norm of matrimony that is not something I could have with another guy – and trust me, I have often wished such a thing were possible!I see no reason to deny marriage to this loving couple. They’ve been together longer than my husband and I.
I’m from rural AustraliaAlex337:![]()
To be clear, given the pathetic reality that is marriage in America these days, I’m not altogether politically opposed to gay marriage. I just think that there is a natural norm of matrimony that is not something I could have with another guy – and trust me, I have often wished such a thing were possible!I see no reason to deny marriage to this loving couple. They’ve been together longer than my husband and I.
When matrimony is naturally ordered toward child raising, I think it’s worth caring about and preserving. The secular notion of marriage, on the other hand, is a vast social experiment with unknown consequences.Matrimony being a marriage within our Church, while marriage could be within other churches or secular. This distinction is important.
Now I admit to being in a really weird place with this; both of my parents were adopted. (In that both sets of grandparents I have are not my biological grandparents) So I’ve grown up knowing that it’s the people who raise you who are your parents. With this in mind I view homosexual marriage as perfectly fine for making a family.Alex337:![]()
When matrimony is naturally ordered toward child raising, I think it’s worth caring about and preserving. The secular notion of marriage, on the other hand, is a vast social experiment with unknown consequences.Matrimony being a marriage within our Church, while marriage could be within other churches or secular. This distinction is important.
I haven’t commented on gay couples adopting, and I’m relatively open to it. But it is far from ideal. Biologically, the best proven context for raising children is with two parents biologically related to the child. Adoption is a beautiful thing, but it is a second-best thing.Now I admit to being in a really weird place with this; both of my parents were adopted. (In that both sets of grandparents I have are not my biological grandparents) So I’ve grown up knowing that it’s the people who raise you who are your parents. With this in mind I view homosexual marriage as perfectly fine for making a family.