As juvenile as Wonkette can sound, it can and does make some solid points (or links to other sites that do) concerning Benghazi and the hearings of two days ago.
wonkette.com/514824/fox-news-expert-outlines-benghazi-rescue-plan-that-would-have-worked-great-except-for-the-time-travel-part
There is also this:
wonkette.com/515676/gop-benghazi-hearings-dont-support-conspiracy-claims-as-if-that-matters
Also, there is
thinkprogress.org/security/2013/05/08/1982151/witnesses-debunk-benghazi/?mobile=nc
Perhaps the most pertinent passage from it is this:
“Ranking Member Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) questioned that statement, asking Hicks whether he disagreed with Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff Gen Martin Dempsey’s assessment that no air assets were in range the night of the attack. Hicks didn’t disagree, saying he was “speaking from [his] perspective” and what “veteran Libyan revolutionaries” told him, rather than Pentagon assessments.”
The timeline provided at
armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=286253c3-3345-46a3-a120-496a75a448da
is quite instructional, as well.
I realize most of the people on the other side of this debate will remain unphased by all this. But I also predict that, because all this information is out there, the inevitable call to impeach Obama will go exactly nowhere. And if it does go somewhere, even if it succeeds, a vote to put him on trial won’t go any further than a similar motion went during Bill Clinton’s presidency.