U
upant
Guest
have we all forgotten that the declaration of independence referenced the creator.What if the oath said “so help you Buddha”? or “Allah”? or “Gods”?
have we all forgotten that the declaration of independence referenced the creator.What if the oath said “so help you Buddha”? or “Allah”? or “Gods”?
we are called to show people the error of their ways and to lead them to Jesus and salvation. the policies of the Democrats, same-sex marriage, abortion, contraception, etc, must be pointed out as contrary to God’s law. the tables have to be over-turned so-to-speak. we have an obligation to help people find the narrow path! Jesus called us to go and make believers.How about we behave like Christians and recognize that our religious views should exhibit respect towards all people and their personal right to choose what and what not to believe.
Which is an indication that even in a democracy there can be errors of judgement. Matter of fact, Jefferson warned of what he called “the tyranny of democracy”, not that he was against democracy but that even the masses and politicians may do things wrong, such as in a case of a “lynch-mob mentality”.have we all forgotten that the declaration of independence referenced the creator.
But we are not to use the government to do so. If you prefer to live in a theocracy, you have every right to try to institute one. But we do not live in one now, not in the U.S.we are called to show people the error of their ways and to lead them to Jesus and salvation. the policies of the Democrats, same-sex marriage, abortion, contraception, etc, must be pointed out as contrary to God’s law. the tables have to be over-turned so-to-speak. we have an obligation to help people find the narrow path! Jesus called us to go and make believers.
My objection is to the programs being pushed by the national democratic conference. We as religious people have an obligation to fight to stop any new legislation and overturn any existing legislation that is anti-God. Remember the first amendment also protects the free exercise of religion. We are to use the government to do so. We need to vote so the Democrats never get enough votes to pass these anti-God programs. The latest Democratic program in the news is abortion until the moment just before birth. Is this what people voting Democrat really want?But we are not to use the government to do so. If you prefer to live in a theocracy, you have every right to try to institute one. But we do not live in one now, not in the U.S.
This thread isn’t about legislation. It’s about the wording of an oath that may be taken by people of many religions, and if no religion.My objection is to the programs being pushed by the national democratic conference. We as religious people have an obligation to fight to stop any new legislation and overturn any existing legislation that is anti-God.
Yes, but the declaration is only one document and it states creator.This thread isn’t about legislation. It’s about the wording of an oath that may be taken by people of many religions, and if no religion.
Polls show that most Democrats believe in God, including politicians.We need to vote so the Democrats never get enough votes to pass these anti-God programs.
That’s been exactly my point. Where did I say otherwise?And what about separation of religion and state? That’s an important principle in our country’s history, too.
So no one finds it odd to imply that honestly and/or faithful execution of duties only occur with fear of eternal punishment or supernatural aid?Without God an oath has no meaning.
The person is asking for help. Who do you expect help from in difficult times, Oprah? An oath is what it is. The meaning and historical roots of an oath are what they are. The Latin word for oath is Sacramentum, where we get the word Sacraments.Without God an oath has no meaning.
Are you an atheist?
The last election showed us how good polls are.Polls show that most Democrats believe in God, including politicians