You ignore the photos and decide they are of something else, you ignore the facts, although to be fair I know it is because you know NOTHING of this subject and have never viewed the evidence for yourself, and you misrepresent my position as stating that everyone who went to the camp remained healthy. Do you ever read anything before answering?because there was no written policy of killing pregnant women (not children) you think it didn’t happen? children could work. Pregnant women and infants were a liability. So they were murdered first. I’ve never actually spoken with someone who took the position that the victims of Aushwitz – that survived – were healthy. That’s a new one.
I didn’t ignore the photos. I discussed them. My reasoning for deciding they were “somthing else” is not complicated. Each photo on the website YOU asked me to view, has a caption. And each caption says “…on the way too…” It is not rocket science. Stop attacking me. As for asking me if I ever read anything, try reading the cites that you post before you continue to make ridiculous “observations.”You ignore the photos and decide they are of something else, you ignore the facts, although to be fair I know it is because you know NOTHING of this subject and have never viewed the evidence for yourself, and you misrepresent my position as stating that everyone who went to the camp remained healthy. Do you ever read anything before answering?
You confusion and lack of understanding become even more clear. You are not even trying. In the “Liberation” section I referenced there is no caption containing anything about being “on the way to” anything. There are however 2 photos in the “During the War” section that contain this phrase. Not “each photo” but only 2 and in the wrong section. You are right, it is not rocket science, which is why I am perplexed at the trouble you are having. I am not attacking you, I am exposing your attacks on me as completely unfounded. I am not the one making “ridiculous observations”. If you decide to look again, MORE CAREFULLY, please acknowledge your mistakes by PM as we have been OT long enough.I didn’t ignore the photos. I discussed them. My reasoning for deciding they were “somthing else” is not complicated. Each photo on the website YOU asked me to view, has a caption. And each caption says “…on the way too…” It is not rocket science. Stop attacking me. As for asking me if I ever read anything, try reading the cites that you post before you continue to make ridiculous “observations.”
I have heard this as well but I don’t have hard facts. It wouldn’t surprise me. I believe strongly that we need more money to help these young women actually have thier babies.The fact is that there are less abortions in the United States when democrats are in power then when republicans are in power. This is attributed to the fact that there is generally more funding made available for health care for women when the demo’s control things.
So if abortion is a hot button issue for you, it seems that Catholics should be voting democratic. Results over rhetoric.
Throwing money at a moral evil is NOT the answer.I have heard this as well but I don’t have hard facts. It wouldn’t surprise me. I believe strongly that we need more money to help these young women actually have thier babies.
I vote democrat.
So you vote for the party that not only does not provide any more money to help people than the Republicans do no matter how much they talk about it, but are the ones who created the apparatus that exists solely to murder babies and keeps maintaining it as their primary goal? And that makes sense to you how?I have heard this as well but I don’t have hard facts. It wouldn’t surprise me. I believe strongly that we need more money to help these young women actually have thier babies.
I vote democrat.
Exactly. I have always wondered how the liberals convince so many people that doing more of what has never worked will eventually work.Throwing money at a moral evil is NOT the answer.
Getting them to see that killing their baby is evil and wrong IS the answer.
how is it a moral evil to counsel and help young women see that the miracle of life is Gods gift? What is wrong with helping to have thier babies? How is that evil? They need help so they won’t have abortions.Throwing money at a moral evil is NOT the answer.
Getting them to see that killing their baby is evil and wrong IS the answer.
I vote more in line with what Jesus taught us in the Beatitudes…it’s not a perfect system but the democrates in my mind come closer to more of those then republicans.So you vote for the party that not only does not provide any more money to help people than the Republicans do no matter how much they talk about it, but are the ones who created the apparatus that exists solely to murder babies and keeps maintaining it as their primary goal? And that makes sense to you how?
Oh no, it doesn’t offend me. It is just hard to understand. Infinitely more so when you say “I vote more in line with what Jesus taught us…”. The current Democratic party and their beliefs and policies are about as far from the teachings of Jesus as any political party you could name. Sure, a lot of Republicans are no better but with the Democrats you are talking about a party whose most valued belief is in the right to murder your child. Some other things that come to mind:I vote more in line with what Jesus taught us in the Beatitudes…it’s not a perfect system but the democrates in my mind come closer to more of those then republicans.
I’m sorry if this offends you.
you are confusing liberals with democrats.Exactly. I have always wondered how the liberals convince so many people that doing more of what has never worked will eventually work.
that makes no sense whatsoever. You make some nonsense analogy about prison and imply that I’m the one dumbing things down?So following your line of thought…
There are less murders inside a prison, so that is a safer place to live?
Seriously, this is a black and white issue on against life or for life.
This argument crops up every once in a while on here for the die hard Democrats who dumb things down to ease their guilt for justifying voting pro death.
We CANNOT stop abortion until people’s hearts change - not their financial picture. Rich people have abortions about as much as poor people.how is it a moral evil to counsel and help young women see that the miracle of life is Gods gift? What is wrong with helping to have thier babies? How is that evil? They need help so they won’t have abortions.
No, getting them to see and understand how beautiful conception and the miracle of birth is will change hearts. I don’t believe in hard cord tactics. I don’t believe we will ever have conversation of the heart with that approach.
Figures lie and liars figure! The Democrat Party is pro-choice in both rhetoric and action. The Democrat’s have fought, obstructed or blocked virtually all efforts to provide women and girls alternatives to abortion in the way of information, education and assistance. Read up on the debacle that’s going on in Kansas right now. Who’s supporting ‘Tiller the Killer’…democrats! Who vetoed the ban on partial birth abortions 3 times, Clinton.The fact is that there are less abortions in the United States when democrats are in power then when republicans are in power. This is attributed to the fact that there is generally more funding made available for health care for women when the demo’s control things.
So if abortion is a hot button issue for you, it seems that Catholics should be voting democratic. Results over rhetoric.
Very good question. I love Bob’s signature line “If it ain’t broke, fix it til’ it is.” I think that we are doing the same, in reverse, with education. It is broke and we keep doing the same thing, or more of the same to fix it. Where is the logic in that?Exactly. I have always wondered how the liberals convince so many people that doing more of what has never worked will eventually work.